Table of contents
Interactive Workflow
Darcs allows users to interactively choose which patches to apply, amend, or record, enabling a more fine-grained control over changes. This feature is beneficial for developers who prefer to review patches as they manage them.
Patch-based System
Darcs is based on a powerful patch theory which offers a flexible way to handle changes, making it easier to manage complex merge scenarios and re-organize change history.
Simple and Intuitive Interface
The command interface of Darcs is straightforward, providing simplicity for users in common version control tasks.
Peer-to-peer Capabilities
With Darcs, each repository is complete with its own history, which allows for efficient peer-to-peer collaboration without the need for a central server.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if darcs is good.
Check the traffic stats of darcs on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of darcs on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of darcs's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of darcs on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about darcs on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
Darcs [0] patch theory was a predecessor to OTs/CRDTs (and a predecessor to git as well; in some ways it is the "smart" to which git was named "dumb"). When it works and performs well it is still sometimes version control magic. Pijul [1] is an interesting experiment to watch, trying to keep the patch theory flag flying and also trying to bring in updates from OTs and CRDTs as it can. [0] https://darcs.net [1]... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Perforce. As for DVCS, the best one I've used is Darcs: https://darcs.net/ There are some sticky wickets (specifically, exponential-time conflict resolution) that hindered its adoption. Thankfully, there's Pijul, which is like Darcs but a) solves that problem; and b) is written in Rust! The perfect DVCS, probably! https://pijul.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Well technically one alternative I am going to bring up predates Git by several years, and that's DARCS. Fans of DARCS have written plenty of material on Git's perceived weaknesses. While DARCS' Haskell codebase apparently had some issues, its underlying "change" semantics have remained influential. For example, Pijul is a Rust-based contender currently in beta. It embraces a huge number of the paradigms,... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
We already have the "haskell of version control", darcs, i.e. Nobody uses it. Source: over 3 years ago
Do you know an article comparing darcs to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is darcs good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss darcs here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
