Crusher.dev

Crusher | No-code e2e testing that allows you create and run test in <5 mins. Better alternative to selenium, cypress, browserstack, lambdatest, puepetter for testing.

Crusher is open-source no-code e2e web testing/monitoring. E2E testing is grueling and frustrating. We're reimagining the whole workflow to make it blazingly simple and fast.

We're no-code alternative to selenium, cypress, browserstack, lambdatest, puepetter for UI/User flow for cross browser testing .

🔮 Features

Create test without no code/low code.
Test UI and compare pixel perfect change with the last build.
Replay tests recording to debug faster.
Run test on chromium (Open source) and all browsers supported (EE).
Primitive user actions detection.
Production monitoring (EE feature)
Integrate with Github/Other services as Build check (EE feature)
Get alerts when build fails.
Report accessible by everyone in the team.

2 mentions

Post a review

Add video

Pricing:

Open Source
Freemium
Free Trial
$50.0 / Monthly (5 testing hours)
Official Pricing

Platforms:

Web
Browser
Mac OSX
Windows
Linux

Visit website Status Page

Verify Crusher.dev Edit

Crusher.dev Reviews and details

Badges

Promote Crusher.dev. You can add any of these badges on your website.

<a href='https://www.saashub.com/crusher-dev?utm_source=badge&utm_campaign=badge&utm_content=crusher-dev&badge_variant=color&badge_kind=approved' target='_blank'><img src="https://cdn-b.saashub.com/img/badges/approved-color.png?v=1" alt="Crusher.dev badge" style="max-width: 150px;"/></a>

Show embed code

Videos

Crusher- demo

Social recommendations and mentions

We have tracked the following product recommendations or mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you see what people think about Crusher.dev and what they use it for.

Crusher - All in on testing
Install with just one command npx crusher.dev. Source: over 1 year ago
Ask HN: Do you have a dedicated QA team?
Problem I faced in past with a dedicated QA team is, the development process is often faster than QA. Which puts QA in the backseat with each new release. Also, human coordination becomes a problem as there will be a small configuration of which QAs team might not be aware of e.g. A/B configurations, hotfixes, etc. On the other hand, with devs writing tests is there is learning curve and most devs have not written... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

Do you know an article comparing Crusher.dev to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.

Suggest an article

Crusher.dev discussion

This is an informative page about Crusher.dev. You can review and discuss the product here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.