Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Zuul VS Pull Panda

Compare Zuul VS Pull Panda and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Zuul logo Zuul

Zuul is a program that drives continuous integration, delivery, and deployment systems with a focus...

Pull Panda logo Pull Panda

Dev teams at 1,000+ companies like Pivotal, Instacart, and WeWork use Pull Panda to ship faster on GitHub.
  • Zuul Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-16
  • Pull Panda Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-16

Zuul features and specs

  • Integration with Gerrit
    Zuul is tightly integrated with Gerrit, making it an excellent choice for projects that rely on this code review system. This integration allows for effective gated check-ins, ensuring that changes are tested before merging.
  • Parallel Execution
    Zuul supports parallel execution of jobs, which can significantly reduce the time it takes to run test suites and other CI tasks. This feature helps in speeding up the CI/CD pipeline and improving developer productivity.
  • Dependency Management
    Zuul allows for complex dependency management between jobs, which means it can handle multi-repository projects and ensure that changes are thoroughly tested in context with related codebases.
  • Ansible-Based Jobs
    Job definitions in Zuul can leverage Ansible for configuration, making it flexible and powerful for automating complex workflows and existing investments in Ansible.

Possible disadvantages of Zuul

  • Complex Setup
    The setup and configuration of Zuul can be complex, especially for new users or small teams. It may require considerable effort and understanding of its architecture and components.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Zuul has a steep learning curve for teams not familiar with its concepts or with Gerrit. It may take time for new users to become productive with the system.
  • Limited Non-GoSupervisedGit Integration
    Though Zuul has improved its integration with other version control systems over time, it is still primarily optimized for Gerrit. Projects using different systems might not fully leverage its capabilities.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running a Zuul infrastructure may require significant resources, which could be a concern for small teams or projects with limited budgets.

Pull Panda features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Zuul videos

Fortin ZUUL Pedal Review -The New King of Noise Gates

More videos:

  • Demo - WORST DEMO EVER? - Fortin Zuul
  • Demo - Best Noise Gate: Fortin Mini ZUUL - Unboxing, Demo vs. TC Electronic Sentry
  • Tutorial - Zuul Gatway

Pull Panda videos

Pull Panda joins GitHub!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Zuul and Pull Panda)
API Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Software Development Tools
APIs
100 100%
0% 0
Git Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Zuul and Pull Panda. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Zuul seems to be a lot more popular than Pull Panda. While we know about 13 links to Zuul, we've tracked only 1 mention of Pull Panda. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Zuul mentions (13)

  • 6 Lessons From Implementing a Feature on OpenStack Horizon
    In the event that you push code with lint errors, Zuul will highlight them too, making sure that only properly formatted and error free code is merged. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • How do you handle CI/CD for multiple repos that are dependent on each other
    Zuul (https://zuul-ci.org ) is specifically built for this use case. It was originally designed for OpenStack's CI, with OpenStack being broken down in multiple inter-dependent repos. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Beginner trying to set up CI/CD pipeline for small team and deciding between GitLab, Jenkins, etc
    If youโ€™re already using gerrit I would strongly recommend looking at Zuul https://zuul-ci.org. Source: about 2 years ago
  • F/OSS Spotlight: ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ป Zuul
    Zuul (code) helps your team stop merging broken code -- the best kind of gatekeeping. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • [ANN] zuul.el: An interface to Zuul from Emacs
    I wanted to share a package that I have created, and use, to interface the Zuul CI from Emacs. It offers completion for builds or buildsets, and implements a zuul-log-mode to browse the remote logs. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

Pull Panda mentions (1)

  • Is this could be a great idea?
    Sounds similar to pull panda: https://pullpanda.com/ but the integration with Teams could be a solid differentiator. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Zuul and Pull Panda, you can also consider the following products

Istio - Open platform to connect, manage, and secure microservices

Code Dog for Slack - Make your stand-ups more productive, automatically

linkerd - Linkerd is an ultralight service mesh for Kubernetes. It gives you observability, reliability, and security without requiring any code changes.

Mergecrush - An email and slack reminder bot for daily and weekly reminders of git merge requests.

KrakenD - KrakenD is a pure open source API Gateway that interacts with all your different microservices providing clients a single interface. Improves response times, saves bandwidth, delivers a better user experience and saves developers time.

Microsoft Power BI - BI visualization and reporting for desktop, web or mobile