Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
x

xmobar VS wf-shell

Compare xmobar VS wf-shell and see what are their differences

Zoho CRM
Omnichannel CRM for Businesses of all sizes featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

xmobar logo xmobar

Xmobar is a minimalistic status bar. It was originally designed and implemented to work with xmonad, but it is actually usable with any window manager in X11 and also (via its text output mode) Wayland.

wf-shell logo wf-shell

wf-shell is a repository which contains the various components needed to built a fully functional DE based around wayfire. Currently it has only a GTK-based panel and background client.
Not present
Not present

xmobar features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

wf-shell features and specs

  • Wayland Compositor
    WF-Shell is built to function seamlessly with the Wayfire compositor, providing a fully integrated Wayland experience that offers smoother graphics and better performance compared to X11-based alternatives.
  • Customizable
    WF-Shell allows users to extensively customize their desktop environment through various plugins and configuration options, which can be tailored to meet different user preferences and needs.
  • Lightweight
    Designed to be resource-efficient, WF-Shell minimizes the consumption of system resources, making it suitable for low-end hardware and offering a fast and responsive user experience.
  • Modern Design
    It provides a modern and visually appealing desktop environment with features like dynamic window effects and animations powered by Wayfire's 3D capabilities.

Possible disadvantages of wf-shell

  • Limited Application Support
    As a relatively new system centered around Wayland, some applications might not be fully compatible or may require workarounds compared to traditional X11 environments.
  • Smaller Community
    WF-Shell, being part of a smaller ecosystem, may have less community support and fewer resources available compared to more established desktop environments, making troubleshooting potentially more challenging.
  • Learning Curve
    Users coming from more traditional desktop environments might find the learning curve steep, as they need to adapt to new concepts and tools inherent to a Wayland-based system.
  • Plugin Dependency
    While its customization is a strength, WF-Shell's reliance on plugins for additional features might lead to stability issues or increased complexity when managing configurations.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to xmobar and wf-shell)

xmobar

wf-shell

App Launcher
41 41%
App Launcher
59% 59
Productivity
41 41%
Productivity
59% 59
Note Taking
41 41%
Note Taking
59% 59
LMS
50 50%
LMS
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using xmobar and wf-shell. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing xmobar and wf-shell, you can also consider the following products

The Ultimate SEO Prompt Collection - Unlock Your SEO Potential: 50+ Proven ChatGPT Prompts

150 ChatGPT 4.0 prompts for SEO - Unlock the power of AI to boost your website's visibility.

Yambar - Modular status panel for X11 and Wayland, inspired by polybar.

Waybar - Highly customizable Wayland bar for Sway and Wlroots based compositors. :v: :tada: - GitHub - Alexays/Waybar: Highly customizable Wayland bar for Sway and Wlroots based compositors.

Oatbar - The motivation for creation of oatbar was to extend on the idea of Unix-way for toolbars. Inspired by i3bar which consumes a JSON stream that controls it's appearance, we take this idea much further without becoming a DIY widget toolkit.

Awesome ChatGPT Prompts - Game Genie for ChatGPT

Loading...