Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
x

Waybar VS xmobar

Compare Waybar VS xmobar and see what are their differences

Monitask
Employee Monitoring Software with Screenshots, Internet, Activity and Time Tracking featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Waybar logo Waybar

Highly customizable Wayland bar for Sway and Wlroots based compositors. :v: :tada: - GitHub - Alexays/Waybar: Highly customizable Wayland bar for Sway and Wlroots based compositors.

xmobar logo xmobar

Xmobar is a minimalistic status bar. It was originally designed and implemented to work with xmonad, but it is actually usable with any window manager in X11 and also (via its text output mode) Wayland.
  • Waybar Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-18
Not present

Waybar features and specs

  • Highly Customizable
    Waybar provides extensive customization options that allow users to modify almost every aspect of its appearance and functionality to suit their personal preferences.
  • Support for Multiple Modules
    It supports a wide range of modules including system status indicators such as CPU usage, memory consumption, network activity, and more, offering users comprehensive system monitoring.
  • Supports Wayland Compositors
    Waybar is specifically designed for use with Wayland-based compositors, making it an ideal choice for users transitioning away from X11.
  • Active Development
    The project is actively maintained and regularly updated, ensuring compatibility with the latest software updates and the continuous improvement of features.
  • Community Support
    Waybar has an active community on GitHub and other platforms, providing users with the opportunity to engage, ask questions, or seek help with any issues.

Possible disadvantages of Waybar

  • Complex Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration of Waybar can be complex and overwhelming, especially for users who are not familiar with JSON or configuration files.
  • Limited Out-of-the-box Functionality
    New users may find that Waybar requires significant customization to be fully functional, as its out-of-the-box settings may not meet everyone's needs.
  • Wayland-Only
    Since Waybar is designed specifically for Wayland, it may not be suitable for users who rely on X11 or systems that do not support Wayland.
  • Dependency on Third-party Tools
    Many Waybar modules rely on external tools and scripts for information, requiring users to install and configure additional software to make full use of its capabilities.

xmobar features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Waybar and xmobar)

Waybar

xmobar

Productivity
57 57%
Productivity
43% 43
App Launcher
54 54%
App Launcher
46% 46
Note Taking
57 57%
Note Taking
43% 43
LMS
50 50%
LMS
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using Waybar and xmobar. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Waybar and xmobar, you can also consider the following products

wf-shell - wf-shell is a repository which contains the various components needed to built a fully functional DE based around wayfire. Currently it has only a GTK-based panel and background client.

slstatus - slstatus is a status monitor for window managers that use WM_NAME or stdin to fill the status bar.

The Ultimate SEO Prompt Collection - Unlock Your SEO Potential: 50+ Proven ChatGPT Prompts

Polybar - Status bar for Unix-like systems.

150 ChatGPT 4.0 prompts for SEO - Unlock the power of AI to boost your website's visibility.

Yambar - Modular status panel for X11 and Wayland, inspired by polybar.

Loading...