Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
x

xmobar VS Waybar

Compare xmobar VS Waybar and see what are their differences

TimeLake.io
Improve team performance continuously with time tracking automation. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

xmobar logo xmobar

Xmobar is a minimalistic status bar. It was originally designed and implemented to work with xmonad, but it is actually usable with any window manager in X11 and also (via its text output mode) Wayland.

Waybar logo Waybar

Highly customizable Wayland bar for Sway and Wlroots based compositors. :v: :tada: - GitHub - Alexays/Waybar: Highly customizable Wayland bar for Sway and Wlroots based compositors.
Not present
  • Waybar Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-18

xmobar features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Waybar features and specs

  • Highly Customizable
    Waybar provides extensive customization options that allow users to modify almost every aspect of its appearance and functionality to suit their personal preferences.
  • Support for Multiple Modules
    It supports a wide range of modules including system status indicators such as CPU usage, memory consumption, network activity, and more, offering users comprehensive system monitoring.
  • Supports Wayland Compositors
    Waybar is specifically designed for use with Wayland-based compositors, making it an ideal choice for users transitioning away from X11.
  • Active Development
    The project is actively maintained and regularly updated, ensuring compatibility with the latest software updates and the continuous improvement of features.
  • Community Support
    Waybar has an active community on GitHub and other platforms, providing users with the opportunity to engage, ask questions, or seek help with any issues.

Possible disadvantages of Waybar

  • Complex Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration of Waybar can be complex and overwhelming, especially for users who are not familiar with JSON or configuration files.
  • Limited Out-of-the-box Functionality
    New users may find that Waybar requires significant customization to be fully functional, as its out-of-the-box settings may not meet everyone's needs.
  • Wayland-Only
    Since Waybar is designed specifically for Wayland, it may not be suitable for users who rely on X11 or systems that do not support Wayland.
  • Dependency on Third-party Tools
    Many Waybar modules rely on external tools and scripts for information, requiring users to install and configure additional software to make full use of its capabilities.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to xmobar and Waybar)

xmobar

Waybar

App Launcher
46 46%
App Launcher
54% 54
Productivity
43 43%
Productivity
57% 57
Note Taking
43 43%
Note Taking
57% 57
LMS
50 50%
LMS
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using xmobar and Waybar. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing xmobar and Waybar, you can also consider the following products

wf-shell - wf-shell is a repository which contains the various components needed to built a fully functional DE based around wayfire. Currently it has only a GTK-based panel and background client.

The Ultimate SEO Prompt Collection - Unlock Your SEO Potential: 50+ Proven ChatGPT Prompts

slstatus - slstatus is a status monitor for window managers that use WM_NAME or stdin to fill the status bar.

150 ChatGPT 4.0 prompts for SEO - Unlock the power of AI to boost your website's visibility.

Polybar - Status bar for Unix-like systems.

Yambar - Modular status panel for X11 and Wayland, inspired by polybar.

Loading...