Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

wf-shell VS Waybar

Compare wf-shell VS Waybar and see what are their differences

wf-shell logo wf-shell

wf-shell is a repository which contains the various components needed to built a fully functional DE based around wayfire. Currently it has only a GTK-based panel and background client.

Waybar logo Waybar

Highly customizable Wayland bar for Sway and Wlroots based compositors. :v: :tada: - GitHub - Alexays/Waybar: Highly customizable Wayland bar for Sway and Wlroots based compositors.
Not present
  • Waybar Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-18

wf-shell features and specs

  • Wayland Compositor
    WF-Shell is built to function seamlessly with the Wayfire compositor, providing a fully integrated Wayland experience that offers smoother graphics and better performance compared to X11-based alternatives.
  • Customizable
    WF-Shell allows users to extensively customize their desktop environment through various plugins and configuration options, which can be tailored to meet different user preferences and needs.
  • Lightweight
    Designed to be resource-efficient, WF-Shell minimizes the consumption of system resources, making it suitable for low-end hardware and offering a fast and responsive user experience.
  • Modern Design
    It provides a modern and visually appealing desktop environment with features like dynamic window effects and animations powered by Wayfire's 3D capabilities.

Possible disadvantages of wf-shell

  • Limited Application Support
    As a relatively new system centered around Wayland, some applications might not be fully compatible or may require workarounds compared to traditional X11 environments.
  • Smaller Community
    WF-Shell, being part of a smaller ecosystem, may have less community support and fewer resources available compared to more established desktop environments, making troubleshooting potentially more challenging.
  • Learning Curve
    Users coming from more traditional desktop environments might find the learning curve steep, as they need to adapt to new concepts and tools inherent to a Wayland-based system.
  • Plugin Dependency
    While its customization is a strength, WF-Shell's reliance on plugins for additional features might lead to stability issues or increased complexity when managing configurations.

Waybar features and specs

  • Highly Customizable
    Waybar provides extensive customization options that allow users to modify almost every aspect of its appearance and functionality to suit their personal preferences.
  • Support for Multiple Modules
    It supports a wide range of modules including system status indicators such as CPU usage, memory consumption, network activity, and more, offering users comprehensive system monitoring.
  • Supports Wayland Compositors
    Waybar is specifically designed for use with Wayland-based compositors, making it an ideal choice for users transitioning away from X11.
  • Active Development
    The project is actively maintained and regularly updated, ensuring compatibility with the latest software updates and the continuous improvement of features.
  • Community Support
    Waybar has an active community on GitHub and other platforms, providing users with the opportunity to engage, ask questions, or seek help with any issues.

Possible disadvantages of Waybar

  • Complex Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration of Waybar can be complex and overwhelming, especially for users who are not familiar with JSON or configuration files.
  • Limited Out-of-the-box Functionality
    New users may find that Waybar requires significant customization to be fully functional, as its out-of-the-box settings may not meet everyone's needs.
  • Wayland-Only
    Since Waybar is designed specifically for Wayland, it may not be suitable for users who rely on X11 or systems that do not support Wayland.
  • Dependency on Third-party Tools
    Many Waybar modules rely on external tools and scripts for information, requiring users to install and configure additional software to make full use of its capabilities.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to wf-shell and Waybar)
App Launcher
54 54%
46% 46
Productivity
52 52%
48% 48
Note Taking
52 52%
48% 48
LMS
50 50%
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using wf-shell and Waybar. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing wf-shell and Waybar, you can also consider the following products

The Ultimate SEO Prompt Collection - Unlock Your SEO Potential: 50+ Proven ChatGPT Prompts

slstatus - slstatus is a status monitor for window managers that use WM_NAME or stdin to fill the status bar.

150 ChatGPT 4.0 prompts for SEO - Unlock the power of AI to boost your website's visibility.

Polybar - Status bar for Unix-like systems.

Awesome ChatGPT Prompts - Game Genie for ChatGPT

Yambar - Modular status panel for X11 and Wayland, inspired by polybar.