Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Xively VS PING

Compare Xively VS PING and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Xively logo Xively

Xively offers an Internet of Things product relationship management solution for enterprises.

PING logo PING

PING (Partimage Is Not Ghost) is a free software Linux-based live CD ISO built upon the partimage...
  • Xively Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-16
  • PING Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-26

Xively features and specs

  • Ease of Integration
    Xively offers a simple and straightforward API that makes it easy for developers to integrate IoT devices.
  • Scalability
    The platform is designed to handle a large number of devices and data points, which makes it suitable for growing IoT deployments.
  • Real-time Data
    Xively provides real-time data streaming and analytics, allowing users to make immediate decisions based on live data.
  • Security
    Strong emphasis on security features like device authentication and data encryption to protect sensitive information.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform includes a user-friendly dashboard that helps in monitoring and managing connected devices efficiently.

Possible disadvantages of Xively

  • Cost
    The pricing model can be expensive for small businesses or individual developers compared to some competitors.
  • Limited Customization
    While the platform is user-friendly, it may offer limited customizability for very specific use cases or unique requirements.
  • Dependency on External Service
    Relying on Xively means any downtime or service interruption on their end could affect your IoT deployments.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its ease of integration, new users may face a learning curve to familiarize themselves with all features and capabilities.
  • Data Storage Limitations
    There might be limitations on data storage, which could be a concern for applications requiring extensive historical data analysis.

PING features and specs

  • Easy Connectivity Testing
    PING allows users to test the reachability of a host on an Internet Protocol (IP) network, making it a valuable tool for troubleshooting network connectivity issues.
  • Quick Response
    By sending a series of Echo Request messages and waiting for Echo Reply messages, PING provides quick feedback on the status of network connections, aiding in rapid diagnostics.
  • Minimal Setup
    PING requires minimal setup and can be used immediately, making it accessible even for users without advanced technical knowledge.
  • Widely Available
    As one of the most fundamental network utilities, PING is available on virtually all operating systems, offering a universal solution for connectivity testing.
  • Low Resource Consumption
    PING consumes very little network and system resources, making it an efficient tool for diagnosing network issues without significant overhead.

Possible disadvantages of PING

  • Limited Diagnostic Information
    While PING can confirm if a host is reachable, it doesn't provide detailed diagnostic information such as the nature of the problem or specific areas of network failure.
  • Firewall and Security Restrictions
    Many networks have firewall rules or security settings that block PING requests, which can result in false negatives and limit the utility of the tool.
  • Does Not Measure Quality
    PING measures reachability but does not provide insights into network quality aspects such as bandwidth, jitter, or packet loss, which are vital for diagnosing performance issues.
  • Potential for Abuse
    Due to its simplicity, PING can be exploited for Denial of Service (DoS) attacks by overwhelming a target with excessive requests, leading to misuse in malicious activities.
  • Dependent on Network Type
    The effectiveness of PING can vary depending on the type of network (e.g., local vs. wide area networks), with some networks having higher latencies or other characteristics that can obscure results.

Analysis of Xively

Overall verdict

  • As of February 2018, Xively was acquired by Google and its services were integrated into Google's cloud platform offerings, specifically into the Google Cloud IoT Core. Therefore, Xively as a standalone platform does not exist anymore. Companies seeking similar services should explore Google's IoT offerings.

Why this product is good

  • Xively, a former IoT platform, was known for its ability to connect devices and integrate data for analytics and monitoring. It provided robust tools for device management and offered a comprehensive suite of APIs to streamline IoT deployments. However, the platform's reputation varied depending on users' company size, budget, and technical needs. Its strength lay in its ease of integration and focus on building IoT solutions, which was beneficial for companies looking to improve their IoT infrastructure rapidly.

Recommended for

    Google Cloud IoT Core, the service that absorbed Xively, is recommended for enterprises looking for large-scale IoT solutions that require robust cloud integration capabilities, particularly those already using or planning to use Google Cloud services.

Analysis of PING

Overall verdict

  • Good

Why this product is good

  • PING (ping.windowsdream.com) is generally well-regarded for its reliability and comprehensive set of tools for network diagnostics. It provides users with valuable insights into network performance and connectivity issues, making it a popular choice for IT professionals and network administrators.

Recommended for

  • Network administrators
  • IT professionals
  • Tech-savvy individuals
  • Organizations requiring robust network monitoring tools

Xively videos

Internet of Things with Xively, Arduino and the CC3000 WiFi chip

More videos:

  • Review - Cloud Laser Doorbell with Xively

PING videos

Ping golf face a HUGE challenge - G410 IRONS REVIEW

More videos:

  • Review - Have PING run out of ideas.......PING G410 Driver FULL Review
  • Review - NEW PING i500 IRONS REVIEW - RICK SHIELS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Xively and PING)
IoT Platform
100 100%
0% 0
Tech
0 0%
100% 100
Data Dashboard
100 100%
0% 0
Contact Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Xively and PING. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, PING seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Xively mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Xively yet. Tracking of Xively recommendations started around Mar 2021.

PING mentions (1)

  • Can you take your current Linux installation and migrate it to another machine? Exactly as-is
    He needs some kind person that would take the time to explain him how to that kind of "migration", also explaining him what is the difference between doing this and a low level copy with Clonezilla or PING. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Xively and PING, you can also consider the following products

Losant - Losant makes building connected experiences and solutions easy.

Acronis True Image - (Formerly Acronis True Image) Complete protection for your digital life

Hologram.io - Cellular IoT connectivity that powers innovation

Evercontact - Your contacts always up to date and automatically with Evercontact.

Cisco Jasper - Jasper provides a SaaS IoT platform to enable companies of all sizes to launch, manage and monetize IoT services on a global scale.

CONTACTBOX - CONTACTBOX combines the simplicity of an address book with effective functions of a CRM system.