
Amahi
PetaSAN
Open-E Data Storage Software SOHO
Unraid
ReadyNAS
StorPool
TrueNAS Core
File Sharing, OS & Utilities, and Security & Privacy

Sciter
nuitka
DaisyUI
Extism
Stack Overflow
Stylus Labs Write
Tiny C Compiler
Application and Data, Build, Test, Deploy, and JavaScript Compilers

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, QuickJS should be more popular than XigmaNAS. It has been mentioned 46 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | xigmanas.com | bellard.org |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of QuickJS yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
XigmaNAS Install (2020) | Practical IT
More videos
QuickJS - IO, axios, redaxios, fetch
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using XigmaNAS and QuickJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Next, on the list of FreeNAS alternatives, we have XigmaNAS. Like most of the tools here, this is an open-source arrangement. It works on the Apple, Windows, and Unix-based networks. Like FreeNAS, this tool has ZFS...
XigmaNAS being the FreeNAS alternative, is easy to install on any hardware network to share the PC data storage over the network & store this in a computer network. Network Attached Storage & “4” for open-source,...
A flexible, open-source storage NAS, XigmaNAS offers a dependable management web interface to give consumers a cutting-edge storage option. Also check sandbox software
We have no reviews of QuickJS yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


BSDs may not have a significant presence on desktops, but they're well known in the networking world for their reliability. They also were the foundation used to build OSes for specific applications. OpnSense and XigmaNAS, for example,... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
A standalone NAS running ZFS as the filesystem. So XigmaNAS, TrueNAS, etc. Works beautifully. Source: over 3 years ago
XsigmaNAS - the father of freenas/truenas, much lighter on resources but development kinda stuck in just updating OS and packages and to be able to communicate with community, one have to register on closed forum. Source: over 3 years ago
You don't need V8 for running JS for scripting, you have quickjs[1] or mquickjs[2] for example. You might have problems importing npm packages, but as we can see from lua plugins you don't even need support for package managers.... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
- QuickJS: https://bellard.org/quickjs/ Legendary. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
For those who would like a true "from scratch" implementation of JavaScript, Fabrice Bellard's QuickJS [1] is clean, readable and approachable. It's a full implementation of modern JavaScript in a straightforward project, not nearly as... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
When comparing XigmaNAS and QuickJS, you can also consider the following products.

Amahi is a media, home and app server software known for its easy-to-use user interface. Amahi has the best media, backup and web apps for small networks.
Compare Amahi to XigmaNAS or QuickJS:


PetaSAN is an open source Scale-Out SAN solution offering massive scalability and performance.
Compare PetaSAN to XigmaNAS or QuickJS:


Get Open-E DSS V7 SOHO (Small Office Home Office), a free version of Open-E DSS V7 with basic functionalities of NAS/SAN software platform.
Compare Open-E Data Storage Software SOHO to XigmaNAS or QuickJS:
