Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Xamarin.Android VS Proton Native

Compare Xamarin.Android VS Proton Native and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Xamarin.Android logo Xamarin.Android

Integrated environment for building not only native Android but iOS and Windows apps too.

Proton Native logo Proton Native

A React environment for cross platform native desktop app
  • Xamarin.Android Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-06
  • Proton Native Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-28

Xamarin.Android features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Development
    Xamarin.Android allows developers to write for multiple platforms using a single codebase, facilitating code reuse and reducing development time and costs.
  • Native Performance
    Applications built with Xamarin.Android can achieve near-native performance levels, leveraging platform-specific APIs and hardware capabilities.
  • Shared Codebase
    Developers can share a large portion of their code across different platforms (i.e., Android, iOS, Windows), simplifying maintenance and updates.
  • Access to .NET Libraries
    Xamarin.Android enables the use of the extensive .NET ecosystem and libraries, providing a robust and well-supported development environment.
  • Strong Integration with Visual Studio
    Xamarin offers seamless integration with Visual Studio, allowing developers to use familiar tools and workflows to debug, test, and deploy their applications.

Possible disadvantages of Xamarin.Android

  • Overhead and Package Size
    Xamarin.Android applications can have larger package sizes and extra overhead compared to natively developed applications.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers coming from a purely native Android development background (Java/Kotlin) may face a steep learning curve when transitioning to C# and the Xamarin framework.
  • Limited Access to Latest Features
    Sometimes there may be delays in gaining access to the latest Android features and updates, as Xamarin bindings need to be updated to support them.
  • Performance Overheads
    While near-native performance is achievable, there may be some performance overheads especially with complex applications requiring extensive platform-specific optimizations.
  • Community and Support
    Although Xamarin has a dedicated community, it is smaller compared to native Android development communities, which may result in fewer resources and less community support.

Proton Native features and specs

  • Cross-Platform
    Proton Native allows developers to build applications that run on multiple operating systems like Windows, macOS, and Linux with a single codebase, enhancing accessibility and reach.
  • Native Performance
    By using native components, Proton Native applications often achieve better performance and responsiveness compared to web-based solutions.
  • JavaScript and React
    Developers familiar with JavaScript and React can quickly adapt to using Proton Native, leveraging their existing skills to build desktop applications.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source framework, Proton Native allows developers to contribute to its development or customize it to better fit their project needs.

Possible disadvantages of Proton Native

  • Maturity and Stability
    Proton Native is less mature compared to other frameworks like Electron, which means it might have more bugs or lack certain features that developers expect.
  • Community and Support
    The community around Proton Native is smaller, which can make finding support and resources more challenging for developers new to the framework.
  • Limited Libraries and Tools
    Compared to more established frameworks, Proton Native may have fewer third-party libraries and tools available, limiting the ease of development for more complex applications.
  • Documentation
    The available documentation for Proton Native may not be as comprehensive or updated as other frameworks, making it harder for developers to understand and use effectively.

Analysis of Xamarin.Android

Overall verdict

  • Xamarin.Android is a solid choice for developers who are already familiar with C# and .NET, and those who want to create cross-platform applications efficiently. It offers a balance between code sharing and native performance, making it a good option for many business and enterprise applications.

Why this product is good

  • Xamarin.Android, part of the Xamarin framework, is a popular choice among developers for building cross-platform mobile applications. It allows developers to write Android apps using C# and .NET, leveraging a single codebase for multiple platforms. Xamarin.Android provides access to native APIs and UI elements, ensuring that apps not only perform well but also have a native look and feel. Additionally, it is backed by Microsoft, which ensures good support and regular updates.

Recommended for

  • Developers with expertise in C# and .NET.
  • Organizations looking to develop cross-platform apps with shared codebases.
  • Projects that require access to native Android APIs and performance.
  • Developers who want integration with Microsoft ecosystem and tools.

Xamarin.Android videos

No Xamarin.Android videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Proton Native videos

+ Add

Getting Started With Proton Native

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Xamarin.Android and Proton Native)

Xamarin.Android

Proton Native

IDE
100 100%
IDE
0% 0
Development Tools
0 0%
Development Tools
100% 100
Text Editors
100 100%
Text Editors
0% 0
Rapid Application Development
0 0%
Rapid Application Development
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Xamarin.Android and Proton Native. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Xamarin.Android and Proton Native

Xamarin.Android Reviews

We have no reviews of Xamarin.Android yet.
Be the first one to post

Proton Native Reviews

Electron.js Alternatives For Cross-Platform Development
Proton Native allows developers to create effective cross-platform solutions using React Syntax. It uses the same syntax as React Native and allows developers to utilize all the available react-libraries for creating complex desktop solutions with ease.
Source: www.atatus.com
Electron Alternatives๏นฃ5 Best JavaScript Frameworks for Desktop Apps
Proton Native is a fresh release. It was made available on GitHub in the early months of 2018. What Proton Native does for desktop app development is similar to what React Native has done for mobile.
Source: brainhub.eu

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Xamarin.Android seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Xamarin.Android mentions (6)

  • Why is Android Development so difficult/complex? (compared to Web and Desktop)
    Take a look at https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/apps/mobile. It will allow you to write Android apps in C# in Visual Studio. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Stop EU Chat Control
    > It's not hardware. So now are kernel extensions also โ€œapplicationsโ€? > VSCode is an app that needs the .NET runtime, in order to run the code you write in e.g. C#. You could not possibly be more wrong. VSCode is written in Typescript. It is an Electron app. There have been cross platform JS frameworks that ran on iOS for a decade. Besides that, itโ€™s been years since you have needed the .Net runtime to run... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • this sub in a nutshell
    Ah, so C# (and .NET) does have its answer to Qt, point taken. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Which programming language to learn next (as a competitive programer before college)?
    C# can be used for mobile and macOS - https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/apps/xamarin/mobile-apps. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • How good is .Net Core for iOS apps?
    Iric thatโ€™s only possible with Microsoft Xamarin. Never used it, rarely hear about it. Source: about 4 years ago
View more

Proton Native mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Proton Native yet. Tracking of Proton Native recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Xamarin.Android and Proton Native, you can also consider the following products

RAD Studio - RAD Studio 10.2 with Delphi Linux compiler is the fastest way to write, compile, package and deploy cross-platform native software applications. Learn more.

Electron - Build cross platform desktop apps with web technologies

Rider - Rider is a cross-platform .NET IDE based on the IntelliJ platform and ReSharper.

NW.js - nwjs

Qt Creator - Qt Creator is a cross-platform C++, JavaScript and QML integrated development environment. It is the fastest, easiest and most fun experience a C++ developer could wish for.

NeutralinoJS - Neutralino is a lightweight application development framework.

Loading...