Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

WP2Static VS Static Site Boilerplate

Compare WP2Static VS Static Site Boilerplate and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

WP2Static logo WP2Static

Static site generator for WordPress

Static Site Boilerplate logo Static Site Boilerplate

A better workflow for building modern static websites.
  • WP2Static Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-23
  • Static Site Boilerplate Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-10

WP2Static features and specs

  • Performance
    By converting a dynamic WordPress site into a static one, WP2Static eliminates the need to query the database or execute PHP code, resulting in faster page load times.
  • Security
    Static sites have a reduced attack surface as they do not rely on server-side code execution. This significantly decreases the risk of vulnerabilities such as SQL injection and other attacks common to dynamic sites.
  • Scalability
    Static sites can handle a large volume of traffic without additional infrastructure because they serve pre-rendered files, greatly reducing the demand on the server.
  • Cost Reduction
    Without the need for a high-performance server or a database, hosting static sites can be much cheaper compared to dynamic sites.
  • Ease of Deployment
    Static files can be easily deployed to any web hosting platform, CDN, or file storage service, making it flexible in terms of hosting options.

Possible disadvantages of WP2Static

  • Limited Interactivity
    Static sites lack dynamic features such as user authentication and content management, which are inherent to WordPress by default.
  • Complex Updates
    Updating content on a static site requires regenerating and redeploying the static files, which is less straightforward compared to updating a dynamic WordPress site.
  • Plugin Compatibility
    Some WordPress plugins rely on dynamic content generation or server-side execution, which may not work as expected with static site generators.
  • Learning Curve
    Users may need to adapt to a different workflow for deploying updates and managing their site, especially if they are accustomed to a traditional WordPress setup.
  • SEO Concerns
    Certain SEO features, like dynamic XML sitemaps or real-time meta tags updates, require special handling or additional tools to implement in static sites.

Static Site Boilerplate features and specs

  • Performance
    Static Site Boilerplate is known for its fast loading times since it serves static files, which can be delivered quickly from a CDN.
  • Security
    Static sites have fewer attack vectors compared to dynamic sites, reducing vulnerabilities like SQL injection and server-side attacks.
  • Scalability
    Static Site Boilerplate inherently supports high scalability because static files can be easily replicated on multiple servers.
  • Simplicity
    The framework is straightforward and simple to use, making it accessible to developers who want to create fast and efficient websites with minimal configuration.
  • No Server-Side Dependency
    Since the output is purely static files, there's no need for any backend infrastructure or server management.

Possible disadvantages of Static Site Boilerplate

  • Limited Dynamic Functionality
    Static Site Boilerplate is not ideal for websites that require server-side processing or real-time dynamic content as it does not support traditional backend server logic.
  • Content Management
    Managing and updating content can be more cumbersome without a content management system (CMS) integrated into the workflow.
  • Build Time
    With large sites, the build process can become time-consuming, as regenerating static files for every change takes time.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    For beginners, the initial setup and understanding of static site generation tools might seem complex compared to using a CMS.
  • Limited Interactivity
    While possible to enhance with JavaScript, static sites inherently don't support highly interactive elements natively without additional scripting.

WP2Static videos

Simply Static Vs WP2Static - Creating Static Sites with Wordpress

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to create a Static version of your Wordpress Website (DEPRECATED) PLEASE USE wp2static

Static Site Boilerplate videos

No Static Site Boilerplate videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WP2Static and Static Site Boilerplate)
Blogging
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
CMS
100 100%
0% 0
Design Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using WP2Static and Static Site Boilerplate. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, WP2Static seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WP2Static mentions (12)

  • WordPress plugin hole puts '2M websites' at risk
    > It is not actually that hard to run Wordpress securely. Stick to supported plugins and themes, and install security patches quickly when they are released. Depending on your site's functionality, it may also be possible to run a static WP site: * https://wordpress.org/plugins/simply-static/ * https://wp2static.com You do all your regular updates via the CMS, but, instead of putting the dynamic site on the... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Wordpress.org website creation and hosting
    The closest "free" option I can think of is Oracle Cloud, but /r/oraclecloud shows plenty of horror stories in registration and maintaining an instance. If you don't actually need interactive features, WP2Static on your local instance to be deployed to Cloudflare Pages might work. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Wp-SQLite: WordPress running on an SQLite database
    > Most WP sites should be static sites. https://wordpress.org/plugins/simply-static/ https://wp2static.com. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • WordPress sites getting hacked โ€˜within secondsโ€™ of TLS certificates being issued
    Depending on the site, ask yourself "How dynamic does it actually have to be?". Perhaps using the GUI to update the content, and then creating static files and serving those may be an option: * https://wp2static.com. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Building a blog from scratch in 2022 using Hugo, Docker and a bit of Python
    What is wrong with using Wordpress? I believe now one can get Wordpress to have 'static site' capabilities these days [0] [0] https://wp2static.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
View more

Static Site Boilerplate mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Static Site Boilerplate yet. Tracking of Static Site Boilerplate recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WP2Static and Static Site Boilerplate, you can also consider the following products

Simply Static - Never worry about WordPress hacks again.

React Boilerplate - Offline-first, highly scalable foundation for your next app

Staatic - Staatic is a platform to create an extremely fast and highly secure static version of your WordPress site without effort.

Unused CSS finder - Crawl your website and find unused CSS

Web Reactionz - Global reactions for the Web

CSSViewer - A simple CSS property viewer