Worklytics VS Workclave

Workclave's answer:

Project-based IT services firms, software agencies and consultancies that bill clients by the hour or on retainer. The buyers are founders, delivery heads and operations managers who need clean attendance records for compliance and accurate billable hours for invoicing, without running two separate tools.

Workclave's answer:

Workclave grew out of a problem every IT agency knows. One tool keeps the attendance register for HR, another tracks billable hours, and neither talks to the other. People log their day twice, and on Friday someone rebuilds the week from memory. The hours lost in that gap aren't stolen, they just never get written down.

We built Workclave to merge the two into one record: a session that starts against a project and client, gets a manager's approval, and then serves as the compliance register, the payroll input and the invoice line. Workclave is built by Mecverse and is onboarding its first teams.

Workclave's answer:

• Attendance and billing in one tool: Toggl and Harvest track billable time but keep no attendance register. HR tools keep the register but know nothing about clients. Workclave does both from the same session.
• Approval before the invoice: an unapproved session can never reach a client bill, which cuts billing disputes.
• Fair pricing: free for up to 3 users, then $5/user/month with no base fee, seat minimum or annual lock-in.
• No surveillance: no screenshots, keystroke logging or biometric capture.
• No lock-in: full CSV export and a REST API on every plan, including free.

Workclave's answer:

Most attendance tools record when someone showed up. Workclave records what they worked on. Each session is linked to a project and client before it starts, and a manager approves it before it can touch payroll or an invoice. One record covers attendance compliance, payroll input and client billing, so teams stop running an HR tool and a time tracker side by side. It does this without screenshots, keystroke logging or biometrics.