
Greenhouse
Breezy.hr
Lever
Recruitee
LinkedIn Recruiter
Jobvite
SmartRecruiters
Hire better with Workable. Post to the top job boards and enjoy a simple, intuitive applicant tracking system, made for teams. Start a free trial today.

Flexjobs
Jobicy
Breezy.hr
WeWorkRemotely
Remote OK
Remotive
indeed
AI training and a human-graded certification, plus a screened board of AI jobs, gigs and paid AI training programmes. The board is free and public with no signup; training and certification are the paid membership.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Workable seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | workable.com | getaiwork.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Company | Startup from the United States · 250 - 499 employees · 2012 | — |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


Workable is affordable, useable hiring software. It replaces email and spreadsheets with an applicant tracking system that your team will actually enjoy using.
getAIwork is a membership for people who want to work with AI. It combines bite-size AI training in 20-minute daily lessons, a certification graded by a human on real project work, and a jobs board where an AI pipeline has screened 39,389 postings to date, with every live listing approved by hand...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
No analysis of getAIwork yet.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Workable Review
More videos
No getAIwork videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Workable and getAIwork.
getAIwork's answer:
The published articles run on WordPress.
The Work Board and the pipeline behind it are custom built. Listings are ingested from multiple job sources several times a day, passed through an automated screening and de-duplication pass, then queued for human approval before anything appears publicly. Filled and expired roles are removed on the same daily cycle.
Aggregate statistics are generated from that pipeline and published as static JSON at getaiwork.com/stats.json under an open attribution licence, alongside a human-readable version at getaiwork.com/stats.
getAIwork's answer:
It started from screening job postings in bulk and noticing how much of what circulates about AI work is either out of date or simply invented. Boards were full of roles that had closed weeks earlier, and articles quoted earnings figures nobody could source.
The response was to build the boring version. Screen everything, have a human approve what goes live, delete listings the day they are filled, quote pay only as the posting states it, and publish the underlying counts openly so anyone can check them.
The training and certification grew out of the same work. Screening tens of thousands of postings shows you fairly clearly what employers actually ask for, which turns out to be a better curriculum than guessing.
getAIwork's answer:
Only if the screening is what you care about. If you want maximum volume, a large aggregator will always list more roles. getAIwork deliberately lists fewer, because a person removes the ones that are filled, duplicated or not genuine.
The Work Board is also free and public, with no signup and nothing to buy. That is unusual in this category, where screening is normally the thing kept behind the paywall. The paid membership is the training and the human-graded certification, not access to the listings.
And pay is shown exactly as each posting states it, never estimated or modelled. There are no income claims anywhere on the site, which rules getAIwork out for anyone looking to be told what they will earn.
getAIwork's answer:
Two things, both fairly unglamorous.
First, every listing on the Work Board is approved by a person before it goes live, and listings are deleted the day the role is filled rather than left to decay. Most boards in this space aggregate automatically and let expired postings pile up, which is the standing complaint readers have about nearly all of them. Removing listings is the unglamorous, permanent job that makes the board worth trusting.
Second, the underlying market data is published openly instead of being kept as a marketing asset. 39,389 postings screened to date, roughly 1,363 live at any one time, and listed pay aggregated into percentile bands by field. It is published at getaiwork.com/stats and as machine-readable JSON at getaiwork.com/stats.json, free to reuse with attribution, so everything claimed above is checkable rather than asserted.
getAIwork's answer:
People trying to get into AI work, rather than people already established in it. Roughly three groups.
Career changers with no AI background looking for a realistic entry point. Freelancers and contractors adding AI work to what they already do. And people looking specifically for recurring paid platform programmes, meaning annotation, evaluation and model-training work, which is now close to half of everything open on the board.
The audience is global rather than US-centric, and a meaningful share are non-coders: writing-centred work is about 27% of currently open listings, against 68% technical.
On remote, the honest figure is that 564 of 1,351 currently open listings are tagged remote, about 42%. That share has drifted down slightly since late August rather than up, so this is not the remote-only market it is often described as.
Share your experience with using Workable and getAIwork. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Reach with a published price. Workable is the closest of these to Greenhouse’s weight class: a large job-board network, mature tooling, and pricing by total company headcount from $299/mo (published page, captured...
The big-network option. Workable is the heavyweight here: a large job-board network and mature tooling, priced by total company headcount from $299/mo (its published page, captured July 2026), with AI credits metered...
I only score tools I’ve run with my own account, so this list splits in two. Breezy HR, Manatal and now Tellent carry tested verdicts from their own hands-on reviews; the process is documented in how WiserStaff tests...
We have no reviews of getAIwork yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Link is 100% safe for work (it's a 3rd party job listing site - workable.com). Source: over 3 years ago
Tracking getAIwork since Aug 2026.
When comparing Workable and getAIwork, you can also consider the following products.

Greenhouse Software makes companies great at hiring.
Compare Greenhouse to Workable or getAIwork:

Find the best telecommuting jobs, part-time professional jobs and other flexible jobs in over 100...
Compare Flexjobs to Workable or getAIwork:

A Modern Hiring Tool for the Entire Team. A uniquely simple, visual hiring tool you and your team will love.
Compare Breezy.hr to Workable or getAIwork:

Jobicy is a career-education platform, offering remote job listings, comprehensive career advice and support to empower individuals in their remote work journey.
Compare Jobicy to Workable or getAIwork:

A modern web app for hiring. Lever is a simple, powerful way to manage lists of candidates during the hiring process.
Compare Lever to Workable or getAIwork:

Europe's leading recruitment software for streamlining, automating and optimizing your recruitment process. Winner of OnRec Award 2018.
Compare Recruitee to Workable or getAIwork: