
Cursor
Claude Code
GitHub Copilot
replit
Google Antigravity
Lovable
VS Code
Tomorrow's editor, today. Windsurf Editor is the first AI agent-powered IDE that keeps developers in the flow. Available today on Mac, Windows, and Linux.

Helicone AI
Portkey
OpenAI
LangSmith
Eden AI
liteLLM
Tokonomics.ca
Save 30%+ on LLM API costs. Monitor usage, detect waste, get weekly optimization insights. One line of code.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Windsurf Editor seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 15 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | windsurf.com | tokenwisehq.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Company | — | Startup from France · 1 - 9 employees · 2026 |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Windsurf Editor yet.
Tokenwise is a one-line LLM proxy (OpenAI-compatible baseURL) for makers and small teams. It learns from your real requests, shows exactly where you're overpaying, proven with quality checks on your own traffic, not public benchmark, and lets you apply the fix in one click while it verifies the...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Windsurf Editor yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Is Windsurf Editor Better Than Cursor AI?
Motion Demo
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Windsurf Editor and Tokenwise.
Tokenwise's answer:
Most LLM cost tools stop at a dashboard: they show you aggregate spend and leave the fixing to you. Tokenwise is an optimizing gateway, not just observability. It shows cost per prompt, lets you act on it (route to cheaper models, cache, cap budgets) from one line of setup, then verifies the savings on your own traffic with a built-in quality check, so cutting cost can't silently hurt output quality. That closed loop, see then act then prove quality held, is the part nobody else does well.
Tokenwise's answer:
Three reasons. Setup is one line: you point your existing OpenAI or Anthropic SDK at our base URL, with no rewrite and no framework lock-in. It's actionable: where other tools give you charts and a generic "use a cheaper model" hint, Tokenwise applies the change and proves the dollar savings on your real traffic, with quality measured so you don't trade output for cost. And it's built and priced for solo makers and small teams, not enterprise. Most alternatives are heavier to set up, tied to one framework, or stop at showing you the bill.
Tokenwise's answer:
Solo AI makers and small teams shipping real products on the OpenAI and Anthropic APIs, usually spending $50 to $2,000 a month, often building with tools like Cursor, Claude Code, the Vercel AI SDK, Lovable, or Bolt. People who feel their LLM bill creeping up but don't have a platform team to instrument it. Increasingly also developers running agentic and multi-call workloads, where cost and quality are hard to attribute to a single call.
Tokenwise's answer:
I kept hitting the same wall building LLM products: the bill grows faster than the usage, and you can't easily say which feature or prompt is driving it. The tools I tried mostly showed aggregate spend, or were too heavy to set up, and when they suggested a cheaper model they compared against public benchmarks, which tell you nothing about whether quality holds on your actual prompts. So I built the thing I wanted: a gateway you drop in with one line that shows cost per prompt, lets you cut it, and proves the savings on your own traffic with quality measured rather than assumed. Tokenwise is that, opened up for other makers.
Tokenwise's answer:
TypeScript end to end. The app is a Next.js 16 monorepo (Turborepo) running on a Hetzner VPS with Docker, and the proxy runs on Cloudflare Workers at the edge for sub-50ms overhead. Data lives in Postgres with the TimescaleDB extension, accessed via Drizzle ORM. Auth is Better-Auth, payments run through Polar, email through Resend, and analytics through PostHog.
Tokenwise's answer:
I'm deliberately not inventing names here.
Share your experience with using Windsurf Editor and Tokenwise. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


Windsurf is an agentic code editor, similar to Cursor AI, by autocompleting or generating code, Windsurf understands your entire project before making any suggestions. It can make changes automatically upon request,...
Now, don't get me wrong, both Windsurf and Copilot are solid tools. Copilot is great for quick suggestions across different IDEs, and Windsurf impresses with its polished UI and intuitive workflow. Windsurf's Cascade...
We have no reviews of Tokenwise yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


So the main change here from 2025 is that I've completely stopped using Continue.dev, Cursor and Windsurf. Ultimately, with the improvements that JetBrains have been making to their IDEs, and with the addition of Junie and fantastic... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Windsurf is an AI-native IDE that uses a Cascade system to maintain context across your codebase and provide live generative assistance. It offers generative autocomplete, live previews of code changes, automatic linter fixes, deep code... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
If you're using an IDE like Cursor or Windsurf, you can add a rule to use the DETAILS.md file as the context for the agent. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Tracking Tokenwise since Jun 2026.
When comparing Windsurf Editor and Tokenwise, you can also consider the following products.

The AI-first Code Editor. Build software faster in an editor designed for pair-programming with AI.
Compare Cursor to Windsurf Editor or Tokenwise:

Open-source LLM Observability for Developers
Compare Helicone AI to Windsurf Editor or Tokenwise:

Transform hours of debugging into seconds with a single command. Experience coding at thought-speed with Claude's AI that understands your entire codebase—no more context switching, just breakthrough results.
Compare Claude Code to Windsurf Editor or Tokenwise:

Build production-grade & reliable AI apps with Portkey
Compare Portkey to Windsurf Editor or Tokenwise:

Your AI pair programmer. With GitHub Copilot, get suggestions for whole lines or entire functions right inside your editor.
Compare GitHub Copilot to Windsurf Editor or Tokenwise:
