Windsurf Editor VS Sinatra.dev
Compare Windsurf Editor VS Sinatra.dev and see what are their differences
While you’re optimizing for Google, millions are switching to ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity for recommendations.
sponsored
Windsurf Editor
Cursor
Claude Code
GitHub Copilot
replit
Lovable
Google Antigravity
VS Code
Sinatra.dev
Devin by Cognition
GitHub Copilot
Cursor
Codex by OpenAI
Jules
Claude Code
Ara.so
Sinatra.devNo features have been listed yet.
Sinatra.dev's answer:
It runs on the model subscription you already pay for. You assign a Linear issue or label a GitHub issue, the agent does the work in its own isolated sandbox and comes back with a pull request, and the model bill goes to your own Claude or Codex subscription or API key. We don't resell tokens or mark them up. The free tier is 5 tasks a day on your own credentials, every day, or 1 task a day where Sinatra covers the tokens. Pricing was the reason we built it in the first place, the agents we tried billed in credits you couldn't predict.
Sinatra.dev's answer:
Pricing and entry points. The paid plan is $20 per member per month for the hosted sandboxes and orchestration, with no markup on tokens because inference runs on your own Claude or Codex subscription or API key. And it works from Linear issues as well as GitHub, so a team whose tickets live in Linear can assign work to the agent the way they'd assign a teammate. It also reviews its own diff and posts the findings on the PR, and pushes revisions when a reviewer leaves comments. To be honest about the limits, it only works from GitHub and Linear issues today, and the agent never merges its own PRs, a person does that.
Sinatra.dev's answer:
Small engineering teams and solo founders with a backlog of well specified tickets they never get to: reproducible bugs, small features with acceptance criteria, the work that is clear enough to hand off but keeps getting pushed behind bigger things. Teams already working out of Linear or GitHub Issues who don't want another tool to learn, and who would rather run agent work on the Claude or Codex subscription they already have than open a new metered account somewhere else.
Sinatra.dev's answer:
I built a pet sitting marketplace with my wife. She always had features she wanted shipped and every one of them went through me, so I spent about three months building an agent she could assign tickets to instead. She writes the ticket, assigns it, and a PR comes back. She's now a big contributor to that codebase without me being in the way. I started handing it my own backlog too and eventually it turned into a product. It has been a lot harder to build than I expected, lots of edge cases, which is why it only works from Linear and GitHub issues right now and why the agent doesn't merge its own PRs, you still do that last part yourself.
Sinatra.dev's answer:
TypeScript throughout. A Fastify API for webhooks and OAuth, a Temporal worker that orchestrates each agent run, Next.js for the dashboard and the site, and Prisma on Postgres. Every task runs in its own Daytona sandbox that gets cloned, worked and torn down. Model access is bring your own: an Anthropic or OpenRouter API key, or a Claude or ChatGPT subscription connected to the workspace.
Based on our record, Windsurf Editor seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 15 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
So the main change here from 2025 is that I've completely stopped using Continue.dev, Cursor and Windsurf. Ultimately, with the improvements that JetBrains have been making to their IDEs, and with the addition of Junie and fantastic plugins for Claude Code and Gemini etc, it just doesn't make sense to use anything else... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Windsurf is an AI-native IDE that uses a Cascade system to maintain context across your codebase and provide live generative assistance. It offers generative autocomplete, live previews of code changes, automatic linter fixes, deep code search via the Model Context Protocol, and a Supercomplete feature that suggests your next action. Windsurf also includes natural-language commands to implement features, run... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
If you're using an IDE like Cursor or Windsurf, you can add a rule to use the DETAILS.md file as the context for the agent. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
AI is replacing traditional platforms like Stack Overflow, Reddit, and Google Search for developers — tools like GitHub Copilot, Cursor.ai, and Windsurf are seen as faster, more tailored, and more efficient. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
The Cursor IDE installed on your local machine. Although this tutorial is Cursor-focused, our MCP server also works with any AI client that supports MCP, such as Windsurf or even Raycast. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Cursor - The AI-first Code Editor. Build software faster in an editor designed for pair-programming with AI.
Devin by Cognition - The first AI software engineer
Claude Code - Transform hours of debugging into seconds with a single command. Experience coding at thought-speed with Claude's AI that understands your entire codebase—no more context switching, just breakthrough results.
GitHub Copilot - Your AI pair programmer. With GitHub Copilot, get suggestions for whole lines or entire functions right inside your editor.
replit - Code, create, andlearn together. Use our free, collaborative, in-browser IDE to code in 50+ languages — without spending a second on setup.
Codex by OpenAI - AI that writes the code for you