Cappuccino
Elytra
Enkel
Inoreader
Nooshub
Reeder
Feedibus
Open source & beautiful RSS reader

NovoPsych
Clinical assessment tools for psychologists, therapists and occupational therapists. Send measures by secure link and review scored results, severity bands and reports.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Winds seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 3 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
W
Winds
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | getstream.io | clientforms.app |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

No description of Winds yet.
Clinical assessment tools for psychologists, therapists and occupational therapists. Send measures such as the PHQ-9, GAD-7 and DASS-21 by secure link and get scored results, severity bands and reports ready to review. The catalogue also includes DSM-5 ADHD assessments and autism screening tools....
What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

No analysis of Winds yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Dungeon Fighter Stormy Winds Review - with Tom Vasel
More videos
No ClientForms.app videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

As answered by people managing Winds and ClientForms.app.
ClientForms.app's answer:
Frontend: Next.js 15 (React 19), Tailwind CSS Backend: Supabase (PostgreSQL, Row-Level Security) Authentication: Clerk Payments: Stripe Hosting: Vercel (Sydney region) Database hosting: Supabase (Australian data residency)
ClientForms.app's answer:
Psychologists who assess ADHD and autism. Typically private practice, solo or small group (1-5 clinicians), currently using paper forms and spending hours on admin per assessment. They want something that works and is secure.
ClientForms.app's answer:
Neurodivergent-first design. Most digital forms just replicate paper online. ClientForms is built specifically for ADHD and autism patients - progress bars with time remaining (helps with time blindness), softer colours instead of harsh white, sticky headers so you always know where you are. The forms are designed to reduce anxiety and improve completion rates.
ClientForms.app's answer:
Most clinical software treats patients as an afterthought. ClientForms is designed specifically for neurodivergent users who are filling out the forms, progress indicators, time estimates, calmer colours, predictable layouts. One link, no signup required, works on any device. Patients just open and complete.
Share your experience with using Winds and ClientForms.app. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Another great solution that looks really nice (although harder to setup) is Winds https://getstream.io/winds/. Source: almost 4 years ago
Winds by stream(https://getstream.io/winds/) is now shut down but I did enjoy using it to manage all my RSS feeds. Good thing it's open source been considering self hosting. - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago
So, I was looking for cool and open source/free RSS readers and found Winds, but I noticed that the GitHub repo said "This repository is no longer maintained; No further Issues or Pull Requests will be considered or approved" and now is... Source: about 5 years ago
Tracking ClientForms.app since Dec 2025.
When comparing Winds and ClientForms.app, you can also consider the following products.

Cappuccino is a framework which makes it easy to create advanced web apps.
Compare Cappuccino to Winds or ClientForms.app:

NovoPsych is a tool that is used for outcome monitoring via conducting psychological tests online.
Compare NovoPsych to Winds or ClientForms.app:



Dive into your favorite content. The content reader for power users who want to save time.
Compare Inoreader to Winds or ClientForms.app:
