Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
WM

Window Maker VS bspwm

Compare Window Maker VS bspwm and see what are their differences

LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Window Maker logo Window Maker

Window Maker is a free and open-source window manager for the X Window System

bspwm logo bspwm

A tiling window manager based on binary space partitioning
  • Window Maker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-18
  • bspwm Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-14

Window Maker features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Window Maker is known for its low resource consumption, making it ideal for older computers and systems with limited hardware capabilities.
  • Fast Performance
    Due to its minimalistic design, Window Maker offers fast performance and quick response times, enhancing the user experience.
  • Customizability
    Users have significant flexibility to customize the appearance and functionality of the desktop environment to suit their personal preferences.
  • GNUstep Integration
    It offers seamless integration with GNUstep, supporting a consistent environment for applications developed with this framework.
  • Stable and Mature
    As a long-standing project, Window Maker has a history of stability and has been thoroughly tested over many years, ensuring reliability.

Possible disadvantages of Window Maker

  • Steeper Learning Curve
    New users may find it challenging to configure and operate due to its unique interface and design paradigms compared to more conventional desktop environments.
  • Limited Features
    Compared to modern desktop environments, Window Maker may lack some advanced features and conveniences, which could be a downside for users expecting them.
  • Less Active Development
    Window Maker does not receive updates as frequently as some other environments, which may affect the availability of new features and bug fixes.
  • Compatibility
    While it integrates well with GNUstep, compatibility issues may arise with applications not designed with this framework in mind.

bspwm features and specs

  • Highly Configurable
    Bspwm is known for its high level of customizability, allowing users to tweak almost every aspect of their window management experience through simple scripts and configuration files.
  • Efficient Use of Screen Space
    As a tiling window manager, Bspwm automatically arranges windows in a way that maximizes screen real estate, minimizing overlap and unused space.
  • Lightweight
    Bspwm is extremely lightweight, making it suitable for older hardware and systems with limited resources. It does not come with additional software bloat.
  • Scriptable with Unix Philosophy
    Bspwm adheres to the Unix philosophy of 'doing one thing well'. It functions without managing keybindings, allowing users to use other programs (like sxhkd) for keybinding management, which offers greater flexibility.
  • Active Community Support
    Bspwm has an active community and comprehensive documentation, which helps new users get started and troubleshoot any issues they might encounter.

Possible disadvantages of bspwm

  • Steep Learning Curve
    The configuration process can be complex and overwhelming for beginners. Unlike more mainstream window managers, bspwm requires learning various scripts and commands.
  • Lack of GUI Configuration Tools
    Bspwm does not come with graphical configuration tools, which might be inconvenient for users who prefer a GUI for managing settings.
  • Sparse on Built-in Features
    Since bspwm follows the Unix philosophy closely, it lacks many built-in features and utilities that other window managers might offer. Users need to set up additional tools for tasks such as wallpaper management or system trays.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Some applications that expect a floating window manager might not work well with bspwm, requiring extra configuration or using alternative software.
  • Limited Out-of-the-box Experience
    Bspwm does not come with a pre-configured environment, which can be a disadvantage for users looking for a ready-to-use experience out of the box.

Analysis of bspwm

Overall verdict

  • Yes, bspwm is generally considered to be a good window manager for users who value minimalism and customization. It is highly praised for its performance, simplicity, and the level of control it provides. However, it may not be the best choice for beginners due to the initial learning curve and the need for manual configuration.

Why this product is good

  • Bspwm is a tiling window manager that is highly configurable and minimalistic, designed to operate efficiently without relying on extensive system resources. It handles windows based on binary space partitioning, providing users with an easy way to organize their workspace. Its scriptability and flexibility allow users to tailor their environment precisely to their preferences, which is particularly appealing to advanced users who appreciate control over their system's behavior.

Recommended for

  • Advanced Linux users who prefer a minimalistic and efficient tiling window manager
  • Users who enjoy customizing their desktop environment and scripting configurations
  • Individuals who want to maximize screen real estate and improve their productivity through efficient workspace management

Window Maker videos

+ Add

Testor Window Maker

bspwm videos

+ Add

Switching To Bspwm - Initial Thoughts

More videos:

  • Review - BSPWM - Its like I3 but not.
  • Review - BSPWM Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Window Maker and bspwm)

Window Maker

bspwm

Linux
30 30%
Linux
70% 70
Window Manager
15 15%
Window Manager
85% 85
Qt
100 100%
Qt
0% 0
Utilities
0 0%
Utilities
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Window Maker and bspwm. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Window Maker and bspwm

Window Maker Reviews

We have no reviews of Window Maker yet.
Be the first one to post

bspwm Reviews

Top 13 Best Tiling Window Managers For Linux In 2022
Support for multiple windows, limited support for EWMH, automatic mode for automatically determining the location of app tiles, and configuration and control via messages are among the characteristics of bspwm.
Source: www.hubtech.org
13 Best Tiling Window Managers for Linux
bspwmโ€™s features include support for multiple windows, partial support for EWMH, automatic mode for automatically setting the position of app tiles, and it is configured and controlled through messages, among others.
Source: www.tecmint.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, bspwm seems to be a lot more popular than Window Maker. While we know about 21 links to bspwm, we've tracked only 1 mention of Window Maker. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Window Maker mentions (1)

bspwm mentions (21)

  • well... thinkpads are awesome
    Over on Linux, Iโ€™ve been learning kinda a-lot about linux tools and workflows. I've recently got into window managers, bspwm was my first one and I'm thinking of moving towards a Arch+Hyprland setup in future. Setting it up was way easier than I thought, and I got inspired by a YouTuber named jvscholz, whoโ€™s all about minimalism and productivity. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • What WM should I use?
    Use BSPWM. It supports right clicks by default and its modular. You might want to look for status bars that work with it, slstatus does not work. Good luck, supremacist! Source: about 3 years ago
  • What are some OpenSource apps that are the best of their kind?
    I had not heard of bspwm but I am a fan of telling WMs. Looking at the documentation now, I really like the pragmatic approach lol https://github.com/baskerville/bspwm. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Got some questions before moving to linux...
    I am not familiar with that distro at all, so no idea. KDE Plasma is fine, I use it myself (with BSPWM as my window manager, but that's irrelevant). Source: over 3 years ago
  • MacBook Setup - OS Ventura 13.1 - Samsung QLed 43โ€ - VM: yabai - Terminal: Hyper
    There's a paradigm shift required for a lot of people to start using automatic tiling window managers. Yabai is basically a bspwm port for MacOS and it follows the rules of binary space partitioning. In fact, bspwm has a great diagram on its github readme that illustrates how it works. This will limit the number of windows you can have on any given desktop. To overcome this limitation you use multiple desktops. A... Source: over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Window Maker and bspwm, you can also consider the following products

IceWM - icewm home page . Bug Tracking. If you have a patch, a bug report or a feature request to submit, please do so at the icewm project page at SourceForge.

i3 - A dynamic tiling window manager designed for X11, inspired by wmii, and written in C.

Fluxbox - Fluxbox is a window manager for X that was based on the Blackbox 0.61.1 code.

qtile - Qtile is a full-featured, hackable tiling window manager written in Python.

Openbox - Openbox is a highly configurable, next generation window manager with extensive standards support.

dwm - dwm is a dynamic window manager for X. It manages windows in tiled, monocle and floating layouts. All of the layouts can be applied dynamically, optimising the environment for the application in use and the task performed.

Loading...