Software Alternatives & Startups

WhatRuns VS git-sizer

Compare WhatRuns VS git-sizer and see what are their differences

WhatRuns

Extension that helps you identify technologies used on any website at the click of a button.

Rating
0 reviews
git-sizer

Compute various size metrics for a Git repository, flagging those that might cause problems - github/git-sizer

Rating
0 reviews
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, git-sizer seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 1
Market Research popularity
100% vs 0%

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

WhatRuns
git-sizer
Website whatruns.com github.com
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

WhatRuns 5 features
git-sizer 5 features
  • Ease of Use
    WhatRuns offers a user-friendly interface that makes it straightforward for users to identify technologies used on websites without requiring technical knowledge.
  • Comprehensive Technology Detection
    The tool can detect a wide range of technologies including frameworks, analytics tools, WordPress plugins, and more, providing a thorough analysis of websites.
  • Browser Extension
    WhatRuns is available as a browser extension, making it easily accessible and convenient to use directly within your web browser.
  • Freemium Model
    The tool offers a basic free tier, allowing users to access essential features without any cost. There is also a premium option for more advanced features.
  • Regular Updates
    WhatRuns frequently updates its database and functionality, ensuring that users get accurate and up-to-date information.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Free Version
    While the free version is useful, it has limitations in terms of the depth of information and the number of queries you can perform.
  • Privacy Concerns
    Since WhatRuns scans websites and collects data, there could be privacy concerns regarding what data is collected and how it is used.
  • Dependency on Browser
    As a browser extension, it requires installation and could be affected by browser updates or compatibility issues.
  • False Positives/Negatives
    There might be occasional inaccuracies in technology detection, leading to false positives or negatives, which can be misleading.
  • Limited Support
    Support for users, particularly those using the free version, is limited and may not always be responsive or comprehensive.
  • Comprehensive Repository Analysis
    git-sizer analyzes many different dimensions of a Git repository including commit count, tree size, blob size, history depth, and reference counts, providing a holistic view of repository health and potential scaling issues.
  • Easy to Use
    The tool is simple to run with minimal setup—just execute it within a git repository—and it produces clear, human-readable output that highlights potential problem areas without requiring complex configuration.
  • Identifies Performance Bottlenecks
    It helps identify specific issues that could degrade Git performance, such as excessively large blobs, deep history, large trees, or too many references, which is valuable before migrating or scaling repositories.
  • Open Source and Maintained by GitHub
    Being an official GitHub project, it benefits from credibility, community trust, and ongoing maintenance, and it is well documented with clear explanations of what each metric means.
  • Useful for Pre-Migration Checks
    It's particularly helpful for teams migrating repositories to new platforms or consolidating repos, as it flags potential issues that could cause problems during migration or with hosting providers' limits.

Possible disadvantages

  • No Automatic Remediation
    git-sizer only identifies and reports issues but does not offer any built-in tools or automated processes to fix problems like large blobs or excessive history depth—users must use separate tools like BFG Repo-Cleaner or git-filter-repo.
  • Output Can Be Overwhelming for Beginners
    While detailed, the output includes many metrics and threshold levels that may be confusing for users unfamiliar with Git internals, requiring some learning curve to fully interpret results.
  • Limited to Local Analysis
    The tool analyzes a local clone of the repository, so it requires users to have a full local copy of the repo (or at least enough history) to get accurate results, which can be time-consuming for very large repositories.
  • No Real-Time Monitoring
    It functions as a one-time analysis tool rather than providing continuous or real-time monitoring of repository health, requiring manual reruns to track changes over time.
  • Command-Line Only Interface
    The tool lacks a graphical user interface, which may be less accessible for users who prefer visual dashboards or are less comfortable with command-line tools.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

WhatRuns
git-sizer

No analysis of WhatRuns yet.

Overall verdict

  • git-sizer is a solid, focused open-source tool that effectively analyzes Git repositories to identify size and structural issues that could cause performance problems or hosting limits, making it a valuable diagnostic utility for repository maintenance.

Why this product is good

  • Quickly identifies large blobs, deep histories, and other repository bloat issues that impact performance
  • Simple command-line tool with no complex setup or dependencies required
  • Provides clear, actionable metrics about repository size and structure
  • Backed by GitHub, ensuring credibility and ongoing relevance to Git ecosystem needs
  • Helps proactively catch issues before they cause problems with hosting platforms or clone/fetch performance
  • Open source and actively maintained with community input

Recommended for

  • Repository administrators managing large or growing codebases
  • Teams migrating repositories to new hosting platforms with size limits
  • Developers troubleshooting slow clone, fetch, or checkout operations
  • DevOps engineers auditing repository health before major infrastructure changes
  • Organizations enforcing repository size policies or best practices
  • Anyone dealing with repositories that have accumulated large binary files or excessive history over time

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
WhatRuns
git-sizer
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
Git
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using WhatRuns and git-sizer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

WhatRuns no reviews yet
git-sizer no reviews yet
  • 15 Best BuiltWith Alternatives 2022
    rigorousthemes.com · Dec 2021

    Compared to BuiltWith, WhatRuns is easier to use and shows a simple user interface with details you want to know about a site. It works exclusively as a browser extension that shows you specific technologies of a...

We have no reviews of git-sizer yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

WhatRuns 0 mentions
git-sizer 1 mention

Tracking WhatRuns since Mar 2021.

  • how to keep github repos small?
    Also there’s a cool project from GitHub you can use to help understand the size of git’s objects in your git repo https://github.com/github/git-sizer. This might help you determine what the best cloning strategy could be. Source: almost 5 years ago

Alternatives to WhatRuns and git-sizer

When comparing WhatRuns and git-sizer, you can also consider the following products.