WebTranslateIt Reviews

1. Lizzie

   · Project Manager at Liveminds · over 4 years ago
   Great tool!

   We've used WebTranslateIt for years to translate our platforms, IOS & Andriod mobile apps into 30+ Languages. We've always used freelance translators and the process has always been so simple to get them set up and translating straight away which is so helpful, particularly on a tight deadline. The discussions feature has been invaluable to support translators in context to the appropriate string.

2. J Bonniot

   · Project Manager at Molotov · almost 5 years ago
   Great Translation Project Management Service

   We use WebTranslateIt for the coordination of large translation projects for apps and websites : it's easy to use, easy to import translation files, easy to export, and easy to dialogue with different collaborators.

   👍 Pros:    Easy to use|Third party service integration|Auto translation|Project management

   👎 Cons:    Ui is not very attractive
3. Ines Karu

   · Product Owner of Fitekin at Unifiedpost AS · almost 5 years ago
   Easy and simple

   It was very easy to implement the Webtranslatelt and import existing translation keys to Webtranslatelt using the APIs. Also, the translators' onboarding was quick and didn´t need much support.

   👍 Pros:    Quick and easy|Easy to setup|Intuitive|Unlimited users|User rights restrictions based on languages|Great customer support|Translation key comments are visible (no need extra clicks)

   👎 Cons:    Ui is not very attractive|Attached screenshots need to open in separate tab

EJS Reviews

WebTranslateIt mentions (2)

• Localization in .NET console and desktop apps

  At a previous job we utilized https://webtranslateit.com/ - it organized everything easily for volunteers to provide translations for all resx strings. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

• free-for.dev

  Webtranslateit.com — Free up to 500 strings. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago

EJS mentions (26)

• Next.js vs Express: What to Choose in 2025?

  Express does not provide SEO benefits by default and would require additional configuration with tools like EJS (Embedded JavaScript) or Handlebars for server-side rendering. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Chapter 7: HTML part two

  For a more robust approach, we'd probably need to install a templating language of some kind, such as Twig, EJS, Handlebars, Pug or Mustache (this is not a complete list!). Reading the documentation for posthtml-modules, you'll notice it doesn't mention package.json or any of the approaches we've used in this guide. Instead, the examples are in JavaScript and we've advised to add this to our Node application. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• Web Components and SSR - 2024 Edition

  Server-side Framework SSR is when you use a framework that runs the HTML templating logic entirely on the server to compose the HTML that will be rendered in the browser. These are frameworks like Ruby on Rails, ASP.Net, PHP, or even Node.js frameworks that use templating languages like Pug or EJS. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

• How to Build an Application With Node.js

  We need a templating engine to render HTML code in the browser using Node.js. We'll use ejs (Embedded JavaScript) for this tutorial but there are others such as Pug (formerly known as Jade) and Express Handlebar, which also render HTML on the server. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

• Getting to the meat and potatoes of serverless recipe parsing with Amazon Bedrock

  The tags is where you put the HTML you want Claude to read. The <%- document %> contained within is an ejs placeholder. More on this shortly. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago