WebDrive VS pkgsrc
Compare WebDrive VS pkgsrc and see what are their differences
Shared cloud environments for AI coding agents. Run Claude Code, Cursor CLI, Codex, and Gemini CLI from any device, API, or automation tool.
featured
WebDrive
ExpanDrive
ifttt
FileCloud
Air Explorer
NetDrive
CloudMounter
CloudHQ
pkgsrc
Conda
Homebrew
Yay
Portage
Nix
Docker
BBEdit
WebDrive maps a network drive letter to your remote servers and cloud storage, allowing you to access files in a way thatโs consistent with the way you already work. WebDrive provides file access through the familiar interface of Windows Explorer or Mac Finder โ and from within every desktop application. This instantly familiar interface reduces training and technical support effort.
WebDrive pkgsrcWebDrive is recommended for professionals and businesses that need to manage files across multiple storage solutions seamlessly. It is particularly suitable for users who require secure access to remote files, need a centralized file access solution, or want to simplify the process of interacting with different cloud services from a single interface.
I started using Webdrive about 5-6 years ago when my company implemented it to connect to our Sharepoint server. I've used it for SFTP, and to automatically backup my files to S3. It just makes getting to your files any where in the cloud the same as getting to them on your PC. I use it all the time, but rarely think about it. Kind of a set it and forget type of thing. I've used their tech support a couple of times over the years and have found them to be helpful.
Based on our record, pkgsrc seems to be a lot more popular than WebDrive. While we know about 11 links to pkgsrc, we've tracked only 1 mention of WebDrive. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Ive been using webdrive for years and its pretty great. Never had any complaints. Source: about 4 years ago
> Most open source software packages are also compiled for BSD variants, they switched to 64 bit time_t a long time ago and reported back upstream any problems. * NetBSD in 2012: https://www.netbsd.org/releases/formal-6/NetBSD-6.0.html * OpenBSD in 2014: http://www.openbsd.org/55.html For packaging, NetBSD uses their (multi-platform) Pkgsrc, which has 29,000 packages, which probably covers a large swath of... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
> https://pkgsrc.smartos.org/install-on-macos/ Note that Pkgsrc is a NetBSD-derived project. * https://pkgsrc.org The Joyent folks leveraged it to allow their customers, who were perhaps not as familiar with Solaris/SmartOS, a larger pool of packages. Pkgsrc was running on Solaris before Joyent, Joyent built on top of it. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Https://pkgsrc.org/ from netbsd runs on many systems. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
It seems according to pkgsrc.org that pkgin might follow the PKG_PATH environment variable. You're supposed to set PKG_PATH="http://cdn.NetBSD.org/pub/pkgsrc/packages/NetBSD/$(uname -p)/$(uname -r|cut -f '1 2' -d.)/All/", and according to uname(1), -p gives the processor architecture and -r gives the operating system [kernel] release. Source: over 3 years ago
It seems like pkgsrc.org hasnโt got the news yet. Source: over 3 years ago
ExpanDrive - ExpanDrive is a fast network drive and browser for cloud storage.
Conda - Binary package manager with support for environments.
ifttt - IFTTT puts the internet to work for you. Create simple connections between the products you use every day.
Homebrew - The missing package manager for macOS
FileCloud - FileCloud is an enterprise file share, sync and mobile access solution.
Yay - Yay is an AUR helper written in go, based on the design of yaourt, apacman and pacaur.