Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

WEBCode.run VS Docker Swarm

Compare WEBCode.run VS Docker Swarm and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

WEBCode.run logo WEBCode.run

Simplify project operations by bundling the documentation, code (frontend + back), monitoring and operations into simple web notebooks that are trivial to pickup an understand at a glance.

Docker Swarm logo Docker Swarm

Native clustering for Docker. Turn a pool of Docker hosts into a single, virtual host.
  • WEBCode.run Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-19
  • Docker Swarm Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-01

WEBCode.run features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    WEBCode.run offers a user-friendly interface that allows developers to quickly set up and start coding without extensive configuration, making it accessible for beginners.
  • Cloud-Based
    As a cloud-based platform, WEBCode.run enables developers to access their work from any device with an internet connection, providing flexibility and portability.
  • Collaboration Features
    The platform includes features that support real-time collaboration, allowing multiple developers to work together simultaneously on the same project, which enhances teamwork efficiency.
  • Integrated Tools
    WEBCode.run integrates several development tools and libraries that streamline the coding process, reducing the need for manual setup and configuration.

Possible disadvantages of WEBCode.run

  • Performance Limitations
    Being cloud-based, the performance of WEBCode.run can be affected by internet speed and server load, potentially causing latency issues during development.
  • Limited Offline Access
    Since it primarily operates in a cloud environment, developers may have limited access to coding resources and projects when offline or without a stable internet connection.
  • Subscription Costs
    WEBCode.run may require a subscription for full feature access, which can be a consideration for budget-conscious individuals or small teams.
  • Dependency on Internet
    The platform's dependency on an internet connection for most functions means any network disruptions can interrupt workflow and productivity.

Docker Swarm features and specs

  • Simplicity
    Docker Swarm is easy to set up and use, especially for those already familiar with Docker. It integrates seamlessly into the Docker ecosystem, providing a straightforward solution for container orchestration without the need for additional tools.
  • Native Docker Integration
    Swarm is built into Docker, meaning that Docker users do not need to install or configure another orchestration tool. This provides a consistent experience from development to production.
  • Declarative Service Model
    Swarm allows users to define the desired state of their services, and the system works to maintain that state. This includes scaling services up or down, and handling load balancing.
  • Easy Scaling
    Docker Swarm makes it easy to scale applications horizontally by simply changing the number of replicas of a service. The platform manages the distribution of these replicas across the available nodes.
  • Built-in Load Balancing
    Swarm includes built-in load balancing, distributing incoming client requests to running containers based on task states and node availability.

Possible disadvantages of Docker Swarm

  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to Kubernetes, Docker Swarm has a more limited ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and third-party integrations. This can make it less flexible for complex or custom setups.
  • Less Feature-Rich
    Although sufficient for many use cases, Swarm lacks some advanced features that other orchestrators like Kubernetes offer, such as custom scheduling policies, complex networking configurations, and a broader range of storage options.
  • Community and Support
    The Docker Swarm community is smaller and less active compared to Kubernetes. This affects the available support, community-contributed tools, and overall development pace.
  • Scaling Limits
    While Docker Swarm can handle small to medium-sized clusters efficiently, it may not perform as well as Kubernetes in very large-scale deployments, particularly in terms of resource management and fault tolerance.
  • Future Uncertainty
    With Docker's increasing focus on Kubernetes, the long-term future of Docker Swarm is uncertain. This raises concerns about investing in a technology that might not be as actively developed or supported in the future.

Analysis of Docker Swarm

Overall verdict

  • Docker Swarm is a good choice for small to medium-sized deployments where ease of setup and tight integration with Docker are priorities. However, for larger, more complex environments or when advanced features like custom scheduling and multi-cloud support are necessary, other orchestration tools like Kubernetes might be more appropriate.

Why this product is good

  • Docker Swarm is considered good for users who need a simple, integrated tool for managing containers across a cluster of hosts. Its main strengths include seamless integration with Docker, easy setup, and support for multi-host networking and scaling of services. Swarm is a part of Docker, and therefore it benefits from Docker's comprehensive ecosystem, tooling, and documentation. It is particularly suitable for scenarios where a lightweight and straightforward orchestration solution is desired.

Recommended for

  • Developers who are already familiar with Docker and want minimal learning curve for orchestration.
  • Small to medium-sized teams looking for easy-to-use, efficient management of containerized applications.
  • Environments where tight integration with Docker CLI and ecosystem is preferred over advanced orchestration capabilities.

WEBCode.run videos

No WEBCode.run videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Docker Swarm videos

+ Add

Kubernetes vs Docker Swarm | Container Orchestration War | Kubernetes Training | Edureka

More videos:

  • Review - Roberto Fuentes – NodeJS with Docker Swarm

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WEBCode.run and Docker Swarm)

WEBCode.run

Docker Swarm

Developer Tools
14 14%
Developer Tools
86% 86
DevOps Tools
8 8%
DevOps Tools
92% 92
Containers As A Service
10 10%
Containers As A Service
90% 90
APIs
100 100%
APIs
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using WEBCode.run and Docker Swarm. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare WEBCode.run and Docker Swarm

WEBCode.run Reviews

We have no reviews of WEBCode.run yet.
Be the first one to post

Docker Swarm Reviews

Top 12 Kubernetes Alternatives to Choose From in 2023
With Docker Swarm, you can create and manage a cluster of Docker nodes, enabling the deployment and scaling of containerized applications across a distributed environment.
Source: humalect.com
11 Best Rancher Alternatives Multi Cluster Orchestration Platform
Next, we have Docker Swarm on our alternatives to rancher list. Docker Swarm is a lightweight container orchestration tool that lets you create, deploy and manage containerized applications. It is even one of the most popular container orchestration tools after Kubernetes.
Source: technicalustad.com
Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes: how to choose a container orchestration tool
Docker Swarm is an open-source container orchestration platform built and maintained by Docker. Under the hood, Docker Swarm converts multiple Docker instances into a single virtual host. A Docker Swarm cluster generally contains three items:
Source: circleci.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, WEBCode.run should be more popular than Docker Swarm. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WEBCode.run mentions (5)

  • Blog-cells: Interactive code cells for static sites
    Oh this would be such a good fit for my dream of serving federated backend code from web readable hosting https://webcode.run/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • WICG/direct-sockets: Direct Sockets API for the web platform
    This would be so amazing. In order to access most vanilla services like redis, postgres etc. You need to deploy a bridge https://github.com/zquestz/ws-tcp-proxy -- somewhat abandoned at this point but it is still running), and a big problem with the approach was the web's inability to make TCP connections. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Show HN: I made a local development, debugging and hotreload tool for AWS Lambda
    Yeah, you are right. I made https://webcode.run also for this reason (also hot code reload and debugging but for JavaScript computational notebooks). - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • I Miss the Programmable Web
    This was why I created https://webcode.run the elimination of all tooling and a fast development loop even for backend. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • WebAssembly: The New Kubernetes?
    I am building a compute layer for Observablehq which enables services to brought up using nothing other than a web browser. It's a bit too soon to call it a K8s replacement but the motivation was the complexity and laggyness of bringing up services on cloud or k8s. The WEB + on demand infrastructure is the distributed replacement of K8S https://webcode.run/ WEBCode is about eliminating environments and the... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

Docker Swarm mentions (3)

  • Ask HN: Why did K8s win against Docker Swarm?
    Docker Swarm Classic (https://github.com/docker-archive/classicswarm) is dead. Docker Swarm Mode is alive, and I know some people use it, but it's very niche compared to k8s. As someone who interacts with k8s regularly, I often feel like there is a place for a simpler k8s alternative. But looking at history I see the attempts like Swarm fail. What do you think played the decisive role in the k8s victory? Features,... - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • K8s vs Docker Swarm
    So the thing is support for Swarm was delegated to Mirantis, https://www.mirantis.com/blog/mirantis-will-continue-to-support-and-develop-docker-swarm/ since it was delegated very little was done to move forward swarm _> https://github.com/moby/swarmkit/commits/master , docker swarm itself (docker the company) is deprecated https://github.com/docker-archive/classicswarm . I think because there's no way to... Source: over 2 years ago
  • #30DaysOfAppwrite: Docker Swarm Integration
    Docker Swarm is a container orchestration tool built right into the Docker CLI which allows us to deploy our Docker services to a cluster of hosts, instead of just the one allowed with Docker Compose. This is known as Swarm Mode, not to be confused with the classic Docker Swarm that is no longer being developed as a standalone product. Docker Swarm works great with Appwrite as it builds upon the Compose... - Source: dev.to / over 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WEBCode.run and Docker Swarm, you can also consider the following products

k3sup - from Zero to KUBECONFIG in < 1 min 🚀. Contribute to alexellis/k3sup development by creating an account on GitHub.

Kubernetes - Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers

Divi Theme - A flexible WordPress theme with the power of Divi Builder built in.

Rancher - Open Source Platform for Running a Private Container Service

mvpbase - An MVP boilerplate marketplace where you can find developers and designers to make the first version of your SaaS product.

Docker Compose - Define and run multi-container applications with Docker

Loading...