Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

Web Components VS PureScript

Compare Web Components VS PureScript and see what are their differences

ABcard
ABcard - service allows you to issue an unlimited number of cards to pay for advertising accounts. 3 unique BINs for any work tasks, management of a team of media buyers inside a personal account and complete anonymity when paying for traffic. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Web Components logo Web Components

Native/Vanilla web components.

PureScript logo PureScript

PureScript is a small strongly typed programming language that compiles to JavaScript.
  • Web Components Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-11-04
  • PureScript Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-19

We recommend LibHunt PureScript for discovery and comparisons of trending PureScript projects.

Web Components videos

+ Add

Web Components: The Secret Ingredient Helping Power The Web

More videos:

  • Review - React vs Web Components?
  • Review - A Review of Web Components in 2020 - Bit.dev

PureScript videos

+ Add

Claudia Doppioslash | Building a Graphical IDE in Elm/Purescript

More videos:

  • Review - Haskell Livecoding - Working on PureScript's IDE (3)
  • Review - PureScript Meetup #13 Type Classes

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Web Components and PureScript)

Web Components

PureScript

Personal Finance
29 29%
Personal Finance
71% 71
Financial Planner
34 34%
Financial Planner
66% 66
Android
35 35%
Android
65% 65
iPhone
100 100%
iPhone
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Web Components and PureScript. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, PureScript seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Web Components mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Web Components yet. Tracking of Web Components recommendations started around Mar 2021.

PureScript mentions (2)

  • Building Mystery Mansion Madness without a UI Framework
    Before 2012, all of my websites were made using HTML, CSS and a sprinkling of JS. Then, I went all-in on AngularJS, followed by React. I started using Typescript and then PureScript and learned more frameworks like Halogen and Concur. I even wrote my own UI framework called purescript-deku. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Incrementally Adopting PureScript in a JavaScript Web Application
    I hope you get a chance to try PureScript out in your JS projects! For more learning resources, you can check out PureScript website. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Web Components and PureScript, you can also consider the following products

Fay - A proper subset of Haskell that compiles to JavaScript - faylang/fay

ReasonML - ReasonML is a new face to OCaml that--when coupled with BuckleScript--makes web development easy...

GHCJS - Haskell to JavaScript compiler, based on GHC. Contribute to ghcjs/ghcjs development by creating an account on GitHub.

Scala.js - Build robust front-end web applications in Scala with Scala.js

Mint - Free personal finance software to assist you to manage your money, financial planning, and budget planning tools. Achieve your financial goals with Mint.

Haste - Decreases ping in video games.

Loading...