Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

WeasyPrint VS Fig Scripts

Compare WeasyPrint VS Fig Scripts and see what are their differences

DocRaptor
As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Reviews
  3. ยป Alternatives

WeasyPrint logo WeasyPrint

WeasyPrint is a visual rendering engine for HTML and CSS that can export to PDF.

Fig Scripts logo Fig Scripts

Build internal CLI tools, really fast
  • WeasyPrint Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-09
  • Fig Scripts Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-08

WeasyPrint features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    WeasyPrint is designed to be simple and user-friendly, making it easy for developers to generate PDF documents from HTML and CSS without complex configurations.
  • CSS Support
    It supports modern CSS standards, allowing developers to style their documents in a way that closely mirrors how they would style web pages.
  • Quality Output
    WeasyPrint produces high-quality PDFs with precise layout and text rendering, suitable for professional use.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source tool, WeasyPrint is free to use and has a community that contributes to its continuous development and improvement.
  • Python Integration
    WeasyPrint is written in Python and integrates seamlessly with Python applications, making it suitable for Python developers.

Possible disadvantages of WeasyPrint

  • Performance
    WeasyPrint can be slower compared to some other PDF generation tools, particularly with large or complex documents.
  • Limited JavaScript Support
    It lacks full JavaScript execution support, meaning dynamic content generation via JavaScript is not possible.
  • Dependencies
    WeasyPrint requires several system dependencies, which might complicate installation and deployment.
  • Feature Gaps
    Certain advanced PDF features, such as forms or annotations, may not be fully supported by WeasyPrint.
  • Community and Support
    While active, the community is smaller compared to some commercial solutions, which may affect the availability of support resources.

Fig Scripts features and specs

  • Pre-built automation scripts
    Fig Scripts provides a library of pre-built scripts that help developers automate common tasks, saving significant time on repetitive terminal workflows without needing to write scripts from scratch.
  • Easy integration with the terminal
    Fig Scripts integrates seamlessly with the terminal environment, allowing users to run and manage scripts directly within their existing workflow without needing to switch between tools or interfaces.
  • Community-driven collection
    The scripts are community-driven, meaning developers can benefit from the collective knowledge and contributions of other developers, gaining access to a diverse range of useful automation solutions.
  • Customizable and extensible
    Users can modify existing scripts or create their own to fit specific use cases, making the tool flexible enough to accommodate a wide variety of development workflows and personal preferences.
  • Developer-focused design
    Fig Scripts is built specifically for developers, so the scripts and tooling are tailored to common development tasks like Git operations, environment setup, deployment, and other engineering-centric workflows.

Possible disadvantages of Fig Scripts

  • Limited platform support
    Fig was historically focused on macOS, which limited its availability to developers working on Linux or Windows platforms, reducing its appeal for cross-platform teams.
  • Dependency on Fig ecosystem
    Using Fig Scripts often requires having the broader Fig (now acquired by AWS and rebranded) tooling installed, creating a dependency on an external ecosystem that may change or be discontinued.
  • Uncertain future after acquisition
    After Fig was acquired by Amazon and integrated into AWS, the future direction and continued support of Fig Scripts became uncertain, raising concerns about long-term reliability for users who depend on it.
  • Limited script discoverability
    Finding the right script for a specific use case can be challenging, as the library may not be as well-organized or searchable as more mature package managers or script repositories.
  • Learning curve for customization
    While pre-built scripts are easy to use, customizing or creating new scripts requires understanding Fig's specific configuration format and conventions, which adds a learning curve beyond standard shell scripting.

Analysis of Fig Scripts

Overall verdict

  • Fig Scripts, part of the Fig platform, was a well-regarded tool for terminal autocomplete and productivity, though it's important to note that Fig was acquired by AWS in 2023 and its standalone product was eventually sunset, with much of its technology being integrated into Amazon Q Developer (formerly CodeWhisperer/CLI). If you're referring to the legacy Fig tool, it was generally well-liked for its user-friendly approach to terminal enhancement.

Why this product is good

  • Provided IDE-style autocomplete for hundreds of CLI tools directly in the terminal
  • Easy to install and integrated seamlessly with existing shell environments like bash, zsh, and fish
  • Offered a visual, intuitive interface for command discovery without needing to leave the terminal
  • Supported scripting and customization for teams to build their own autocomplete specs
  • Had a strong open-source community contributing autocomplete definitions for various tools

Recommended for

  • Developers who spend significant time in the terminal and want to reduce typing errors
  • Teams looking to standardize CLI usage with custom autocomplete scripts
  • New developers learning complex CLI tools who benefit from visual command suggestions
  • Users who prioritize terminal productivity and efficiency
  • Those already using AWS tools who might now prefer transitioning to Amazon Q Developer for similar functionality

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to WeasyPrint and Fig Scripts)

WeasyPrint

Fig Scripts

HTML To PDF
100 100%
HTML To PDF
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
Productivity
100% 100
PDF Tools
100 100%
PDF Tools
0% 0
Web Icons
0 0%
Web Icons
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using WeasyPrint and Fig Scripts. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, WeasyPrint seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 38 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

WeasyPrint mentions (38)

  • Render an HTML Table to PNG in Python (5 Ways, 2026)
    WeasyPrint comes up in every "HTML to image" search, so it's worth being precise: it's an excellent, actively-maintained pure-Python engine โ€” but it renders to PDF only (PNG export was removed in v53) and runs no JavaScript. If your table is static HTML/CSS and you actually want a PDF, WeasyPrint is a great, dependency-light choice and you don't need any of the above. If you need a PNG, or your table/chart is... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Ask HN: What is nowadays (opensource) way of converting HTML to PDF?
    Just print to PDF in a browser, or automate that using a browser automation tool. For a non-browser-based open source solution, WeasyPrint. https://weasyprint.org/ For a proprietary solution, try Prince XML: https://www.princexml.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Show HN: PlutoPrint โ€“ Generate Beautiful PDFs and PNGs from HTML with Python
    How does it differ from https://weasyprint.org ? - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • Lyon Drops Microsoft to Boost Digital Sovereignty
    You can learn more about weasyprint on their website (https://weasyprint.org/ ). It's an open source Python package that can be launched using cli or from Python code. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Show HN: PlutoBook โ€“ Fast, lightweight C++ library for generating PDF from HTML
    This is interesting. So it's HTML -> PDF without using Chrome/Puppeteer etc.? Is that correct. It reminds me of https://weasyprint.org/ Weasyprint (by their own admission) have really struggled with a lot of bugs, which isn't surprising if you're allowing arbitrary HTML input - how are you getting on with that? - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
View more

Fig Scripts mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Fig Scripts yet. Tracking of Fig Scripts recommendations started around Feb 2023.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing WeasyPrint and Fig Scripts, you can also consider the following products

wkhtmltopdf - wkhtmltopdf is an open source (LGPL) command line tools to render HTML into PDF and various image...

Icons8 - Free app for Mac & Windows already containing 39,800 icons. Allows to search and import iconsโ€ฆ

DocRaptor - As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more

PDFShift - Convert any HTML documents to high-fidelity PDF using a single POST request

HTML2PDF.fr - HTML2PDF is a HTML to PDF converter that allows the conversion of valid HTML 4.

PDFCrowd - Pdfcrowd is a Web/HTML to PDF online service. Convert HTML to PDF online in the browser or in your PHP, Python, Ruby, .NET, Java apps via the REST API.

Loading...