
authzed
Cerbos
Aserto
Oso
Ory
Supabase
Permify
Authorization and access control infrastructure for developers

SolarWinds Patch Manager
WSUS Offline Update
Microsoft Update Catalog
ManageEngine Endpoint Central
AutoPatcher
WHDownloader
Batchpatch
Patch Manager Plus, an all-round patching solution, offers automated patch deployment for Windows, macOS, and Linux endpoints, plus patching support for 350+ third-party applications You can use it to patch computers within LAN and WAN.
Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Warrant seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 22 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | warrant.dev | manageengine.com |
| Pricing | ||
| Platforms | — | |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Warrant yet.
Patch Manager Plus is an all round solution for your enterprise that enables you to manage and distribute patches to endpoints across the IT network. These endpoints consist of laptops, servers and workstations. Regularly updating applications across these systems, heightens the over all security...
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Warrant yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
This solution is recommended for IT administrators and organizations that require a reliable way to manage the patching of multiple systems and applications, especially those with diverse IT environments or limited resources to dedicate to manual patch management. It’s particularly suitable for medium to large enterprises looking to enhance their security posture and compliance efforts.
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Warrant and ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


I think one major difference between the Zanzibar implementations that are out there is support for the 'zookie' consistency token (as mentioned in the original paper). OpenFGA afaik doesn't implement zookies yet[1]. With zookies, each... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
Warrant — Hosted enterprise-grade authorization and access control service for your apps. The free tier includes 1 million monthly API requests and 1,000 authz rules. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
The specific challenge with authz in the app layer is that different apps can have different access models with varying complexity, especially the more granular you get (e.g. Implementing fine grained access to specific objects/resources... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Tracking ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus since Mar 2021.
When comparing Warrant and ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, you can also consider the following products.

The platform to store, compute, and validate app permissions
Compare authzed to Warrant or ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus:

SolarWinds Patch Manager is an intuitive patch management software for quickly addressing software vulnerabilities.
Compare SolarWinds Patch Manager to Warrant or ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus:

Cerbos helps teams separate their authorization process from their core application code, making their authorization system more scalable, more secure and easier to change as the application evolves.
Compare Cerbos to Warrant or ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus:

Using "WSUS Offline Update" (formerly known as "ct offline update" or "DIY...
Compare WSUS Offline Update to Warrant or ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus:

Fine-grained, scalable authorization in minutes
Compare Aserto to Warrant or ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus:

Official Microsoft Update Catalog download site.
Compare Microsoft Update Catalog to Warrant or ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus: