Walls.io Reviews

1. John

   almost 5 years ago
   We use this social media aggregator at all our public and private events

   We lately used it at a job fair and it was a huge draw. We also use it on an ongoing basis to show our social media presence quickly without having to pull up the individual platforms. All in all, I found it the quickest way to present what I wanted to a variety of audiences. It's a great social media engagement tool.

   👍 Pros:    The look is very slick, dynamic and clean. it is simple to set up. it can be adjusted regularly to vary the theme and add variety. it allows our employees and others who are not on social media to experience our organization's social media presence.|Their moderation options are more advanced compared to other tools i tried.|Our users loved the real time content updates. this is also something i haven't found for the same price in the other tools i tested.|Great customer service.

   👎 Cons:    We just loved it, no cons. we plan to use walls.io for future events as well.
2. Guest

   almost 5 years ago
   We can engage our students, instructors and staff from multiple locations.

   I like that we can curate content using both a hashtag and a social feed. Being able to combine content from more than one place keeps content fresh, and use of a hashtag makes posting easy for end-users.

   👍 Pros:    It has very advanced moderation features. this was one of the main reasons we chose it.|The content updates almost in real time and that's magical during events.|The support team goes out of their way trying to help.

   👎 Cons:    It would be great to be able to easily add extra walls to the entry plan.

Ruby Reviews

Walls.io mentions (1)

• Tools for Mastodon

  Awesome thing! We're adding Mastodon support to https://walls.io/ next week - will allow you to track hashtags and create a Mastodon social wall content feed to embed as widget on your website or run on a screen/display! Source: over 3 years ago

Ruby mentions (4)

• What I posted this week about Ruby

  On Thursday, I shared the importance of contributing to Ruby's documentation, and I wanted to show that even a small contribution can help. Thus, I showed a small PR I submitted for the ruby-lang.org website:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

• A full-stack serverless application with AssemblyLift and Next.js

  The counter function is written in Ruby. Since Ruby is an interpreted language, AssemblyLift deploys a customized Ruby 3.1 interpreter compiled to WebAssembly, which executes the function handler. Since the interpreter is somewhat large, the cold-start time of a Ruby function tends to be larger than that of a Rust function. Our counter is being run in the backround, so we're fine with it being a little bit laggy... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

• Why is no one promoting ruby?

  But, in general I was told use rubyapi.org unless you _really_ want to stick with the ruby-lang.org docs for all you do (which is fine) or to dig more into some object hierarchy, etc. Source: about 4 years ago

• Looking for pwsh (core/open source, v7) integration w/ rbenv, asdf

  [2] 'rbenv' - https://github.com/rbenv/rbenv - Ruby version management utility. Run something like rbenv install 3.1.1 to install that version on your system (requires related project ruby-build), then rbenv local 3.1.1 in your code's directory to specify that for any ruby command in that directory only, you want to use version 3.1.1 that you installed through rbenv. Does other useful stuff too. Only does Ruby,... Source: over 4 years ago