Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Voices.com VS socketify.py

Compare Voices.com VS socketify.py and see what are their differences

Graded Prompts
A curated marketplace for AI prompts, each human-reviewed and live-tested before it goes on sale. Skip prompt trial-and-error: buy working prompts for Midjourney, ChatGPT, Claude, and 26+ more models. Free options, paid from $2.99, plus subscriptions sponsored
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Voices.com logo Voices.com

The World's #1 Marketplace for Voice Over

socketify.py logo socketify.py

Maybe the fastest web framework for Python and PyPy
  • Voices.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-08

Voices.com is a voice marketplace that allows businesses to find, hire, and pay voice actors. The company matches voice actors with people interested in buying their services, without having to go through a traditional talent agent. It is founded by David Ciccarelli and Stephanie Ciccarelli.

  • socketify.py Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-24

Voices.com

Website
voices.com
Pricing URL
Official Voices.com Pricing
Release Date
2005 January
Startup details
Country
Canada
State
Ontario
City
London-Canada
Founder(s)
David Ciccarelli
Employees
100 - 249
Edit details

socketify.py

Website
github.com
Pricing URL
-
Release Date
-
Edit details

Voices.com features and specs

  • Diverse Talent Pool
    Voices.com offers a wide range of voice talent from around the world, making it easier for clients to find the perfect match for any project.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform has an easy-to-navigate website that simplifies the process of posting jobs, receiving auditions, and hiring voice actors.
  • Secure Payment System
    Voices.com uses a secure escrow payment system, ensuring that both clients and talent have a safe transaction process.
  • Comprehensive Job Posting
    Clients can specify detailed project requirements, such as language, accent, style, and budget, which helps talent deliver better-targeted auditions.
  • High-Quality Talent
    The platform tends to attract professional and experienced voice actors, enhancing the quality of work submitted.

Possible disadvantages of Voices.com

  • Cost for Talent
    Voices.com charges voice actors a membership fee to access job postings, which can be a barrier for new or budget-conscious talent.
  • Project Fees
    Clients are charged additional fees on top of the talent's rate, which can increase the overall cost of projects.
  • Limited Communication
    Some users have noted that the platformโ€™s communication tools are not as robust as they could be, which might lead to misunderstandings or delays.
  • Competitive Market
    With a large number of voice actors available, it may be difficult for new or less established talent to stand out and secure jobs.
  • Variable Quality
    While many professionals use the platform, there can be variations in quality, requiring clients to sift through auditions to find the right fit.

socketify.py features and specs

  • High Performance
    Socketify.py is designed for high scalability and performance, leveraging an efficient event loop and native extensions to handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently.
  • WebSocket Support
    The library provides built-in support for WebSockets, making it suitable for real-time applications where persistent connections between client and server are necessary.
  • Asynchronous I/O
    Socketify.py is built on top of asynchronous I/O paradigms, allowing non-blocking operations that can improve the throughput of networked applications.
  • Ease of Use
    The library offers a clean and straightforward API with examples and documentation, which lowers the barrier to entry for developers who are new to network programming in Python.
  • Python Integration
    Being a Python library, socketify.py integrates well with existing Python applications and can be included as part of larger, multi-component systems.

Possible disadvantages of socketify.py

  • Limited Adoption
    As a relatively new or niche library, socketify.py might have a smaller user base and community compared to more established frameworks like Flask or Django, which could result in fewer community resources and third-party integrations.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers who are accustomed to synchronous programming paradigms, adapting to the asynchronous programming model of socketify.py may require an initial learning investment.
  • Documentation Depth
    While there is documentation, it might not be as extensive or comprehensive as those of more mature libraries, potentially requiring more experimentation or source code reading to fully grasp advanced features.
  • Potential Stability Issues
    Being less established, there might be undiscovered bugs or stability issues in production environments compared to long-standing Python networking libraries.
  • Ecosystem Limitations
    The library might lack some of the extensive third-party plugins or tools available in more popular frameworks, which could limit its extensibility.

Analysis of socketify.py

Overall verdict

  • Socketify.py is a solid choice for developers seeking a high-performance web framework in Python, particularly for I/O-bound applications requiring speed comparable to frameworks in compiled languages, thanks to its use of uWebSockets under the hood.

Why this product is good

  • Built on uWebSockets, providing significant performance improvements over traditional Python web frameworks
  • Supports WebSockets natively, making it suitable for real-time applications
  • Lightweight and minimalistic design reduces overhead
  • Compatible with ASGI, allowing integration with existing Python async ecosystem
  • Active development and growing community support on GitHub
  • Good for building high-throughput APIs and services

Recommended for

  • Developers building real-time applications like chat apps or live notifications
  • Projects requiring high concurrency and low latency in Python
  • Teams looking to replace slower WSGI-based frameworks with something faster
  • Applications needing WebSocket support without heavy framework overhead
  • Microservices architectures where performance is critical
  • Python developers wanting an alternative to Node.js for performance-sensitive tasks

Voices.com videos

+ Add

Voices.com Honest Review: Can You Still Make Money In 2024?

More videos:

  • Review - How Voices.com Works and the Best Ways to Get Started โ€” Tips from a Pro Voiceover Artist
  • Review - Voice Over Jobs โ€“ Really $125 Per Minute? (Voices.com Review)

socketify.py videos

No socketify.py videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Voices.com and socketify.py)

Voices.com

socketify.py

Voiceover
100 100%
Voiceover
0% 0
Python
0 0%
Python
100% 100
Online Marketplace
100 100%
Online Marketplace
0% 0
Web Development
0 0%
Web Development
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Voices.com and socketify.py. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Voices.com should be more popular than socketify.py. It has been mentiond 11 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Voices.com mentions (11)

  • What is the dumbest thing you have pretended to be interested in because you wanted to date someone?
    Then it's just about auditioning. There are paid sites where you pay a yearly fee to use like voices.com and there's free sites like castingcallclub.com that will regularly post jobs you can audition for. Some of them are unpaid and are largely for fun (like anime fandubs and stuff) and some are actual paid projects. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Voices.com auditions - changes on what auditions have required?
    I have started noticing over the last 12 months that auditions at voices.com (I am privately invited to them) used to require a sample of your voice, then changed to have you recording a small script to now having to provide a recording of a "full script". In some auditions, it's said "only full script recordings will be considered as our client doesn't have time to review samples.". Source: about 3 years ago
  • Joined SAG too early, need advice
    I found some work as an actor as a teenager, and joined the union due to a minor speaking role in a film. At the time I didn't know better, and thought it would put me further along. I took a few years off and now want to get into voiceover (and maybe screen and stage) work. However, with no credits for the past 5-6 years, I am worried I shot myself in the foot by joining the union. My voice and look is much... Source: about 3 years ago
  • Are pay to play sites worth it?
    I am new to the voiceover industry. I have been doing a podcast for over a year, and thought I would try to get into the voiceover game since I have the equipment. I took a course on doing voiceovers and had two professional demos recorded. I am starting to search out jobs and I am coming across sites like voices.com, voices123.com, backstage.com, allcasting.com, etc.... My question is if any of these sites are... Source: about 3 years ago
  • My theory about William Afton's age
    Given the information about him and Henry in the novels, his physical description, his children's ages at the time, as well as PJ Heywood's role on voices.com, he should be born between 1939-1951; likely in the 1940's, which puts him at mid 30's to mid 40's when he kills the five missing children, and early 70's to 80's in FNAF 3; 40's to 55 when he got springlocked. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

socketify.py mentions (2)

  • Show HN: Python framework is faster than Golang Fiber
    These "benchmarks" are useless, they're not testing anything real world except the performance of uWebsockets. There are copy errors all over the place. And then an advertisement: https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py#briefcase-comme... Is this a professional framework that produces proper, real-world benchmarks and... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • This is how I started the development of the fastest ASGI and WSGI Server in TechEmPower Benchmarks
    After starting the project called socketify.py at https://github.com/cirospaciari/socketify.py, I got pretty good results and reviews, but many people asked if socketify.py could be used to create a WSGI and ASGI server. WSGI and ASGI have a lot of overhead, that's is why I choose not to use them in the first place, but adding an ASGI and WSGI server allows a lot of code already written to run faster! Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Voices.com and socketify.py, you can also consider the following products

CornerThought - Keep your team members informed of all past project lessons learned, issues and business improvement actions relevant to their current projects and tasks.

Essintial - A national provider of IT infrastructure services and support solutions, providing nationwide next-day service and same-day service to 30,000+ locations.

Clickworker - Clickworker is a leading micro tasking marketplace, catering data management and web research services as well as AI algorithms training.

InfoGlobalData - InfoGlobalData is one stop solution for all your marketing database needs.

icecatbrowser.org Gnu Icecat Desktop - GNU IceCat is the GNU version of the Firefox browser. Its main advantage is an ethical one: it is entirely free software.

48hourslogo - Crowdsourced logo contest website

Loading...