Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Visual Studio App Center VS Parrot QA

Compare Visual Studio App Center VS Parrot QA and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Visual Studio App Center logo Visual Studio App Center

Continuous everything โ€“ build, test, deploy, engage, repeat

Parrot QA logo Parrot QA

Automate your bug testing without writing a line of code.
  • Visual Studio App Center Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-24
  • Parrot QA Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-18

Visual Studio App Center features and specs

  • Comprehensive Services
    App Center provides a wide range of services including build, test, distribute, and monitor apps, making it a one-stop solution for app lifecycle management.
  • Multi-platform Support
    Supports iOS, Android, Windows, and macOS apps, allowing developers to manage all their apps in one place regardless of the platform.
  • Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD)
    Offers robust CI/CD pipelines that streamline the development process, helping teams release new features, updates, and bug fixes more efficiently.
  • Automated Testing
    Enables automated UI tests on real devices in the cloud, ensuring that apps function correctly on any device before they are released.
  • Crash Reporting and Analytics
    Provides detailed crash reports and user analytics to help developers understand user behavior and improve app performance.
  • Easy Integration
    Integrates seamlessly with popular version control systems like GitHub, Bitbucket, and Azure Repos, simplifying the workflow for developers.
  • Push Notifications
    Supports sending push notifications to users, helping app owners keep their audience engaged with the latest updates and features.

Possible disadvantages of Visual Studio App Center

  • Cost
    While there is a free tier with limited usage, many advanced features require a paid subscription, which can be expensive for small teams or individual developers.
  • Learning Curve
    Though the platform is powerful, it can have a steep learning curve for new users, especially those not familiar with CI/CD practices.
  • Performance
    Some users have reported performance issues, particularly with the build service, which can sometimes be slow or experience downtime.
  • Limited Customization
    The level of customization for certain features and workflows can be limited compared to other CI/CD tools, potentially restricting advanced users.
  • Platform-specific Limitations
    While multi-platform support is a pro, some advanced features might not be available for all platforms or might work differently, causing inconsistency.
  • Dependency on Microsoft Ecosystem
    Tightly integrated with Microsoft's ecosystem, which might not be ideal for teams using other toolchains and platforms, causing partial or complete lock-in.

Parrot QA features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Parrot QA provides a user-friendly interface that makes it easy for users, even non-technical ones, to create and run tests without requiring extensive programming knowledge.
  • Automated Testing
    The platform offers automated testing capabilities, allowing users to efficiently run tests and identify bugs without manual intervention, saving time and reducing human error.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Parrot QA integrates smoothly with various development tools and platforms, enhancing its usability within existing workflows and making it easier to incorporate into the software development life cycle.
  • Comprehensive Test Coverage
    It allows for testing of web applications across multiple browsers and devices, ensuring comprehensive coverage and helping to identify issues that could affect a diverse user base.

Possible disadvantages of Parrot QA

  • Cost
    For smaller teams or startups, the pricing of Parrot QA can be a concern as it might not fit into tight budgets, especially compared to some open-source alternatives.
  • Limited Customization
    While Parrot QA is designed to be straightforward, its customization options are limited compared to more advanced testing tools, which might be a drawback for users needing highly tailored test scenarios.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its ease of use, there might still be a learning curve for users new to automated testing tools, requiring time to adapt and understand the best practices for using Parrot QA effectively.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    As a cloud-based solution, Parrot QA requires a reliable internet connection, which could be a limitation for users operating in areas with unstable connectivity.

Analysis of Visual Studio App Center

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Visual Studio App Center is a robust platform that provides a comprehensive suite of tools for mobile app development. Its integration with existing development workflows and extensive support across multiple platforms makes it a good choice for developers looking to enhance productivity and efficiency in their app development process.

Why this product is good

  • Visual Studio App Center is considered good because it offers a wide range of features that help developers streamline their mobile app development processes. It provides an all-in-one service for continuous integration, delivery, and testing. App Center supports building apps in different platforms like iOS, Android, and Windows, and integrates seamlessly with various version control systems such as GitHub, Bitbucket, and Azure DevOps. Additionally, it offers features like automated UI testing, real-time analytics, and crash reporting, which aid in improving app quality and user experience.

Recommended for

    Visual Studio App Center is recommended for mobile app developers who require a scalable solution for continuous integration, delivery, and testing. It's particularly useful for teams that develop cross-platform applications and need a unified platform to manage builds, distributions, and monitoring. Developers who are already using Microsoft's ecosystem or those who prefer a cloud-based development environment will find App Center to be especially beneficial.

Visual Studio App Center videos

Visual Studio App Center

More videos:

  • Review - Xamarin University Presents: Ship Better Apps with Visual Studio App Center
  • Tutorial - How to upload a Xamarin.UITest to Visual Studio App Center!

Parrot QA videos

No Parrot QA videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Visual Studio App Center and Parrot QA)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
QA
0 0%
100% 100
DevOps Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Visual Studio App Center and Parrot QA. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Visual Studio App Center seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 24 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Visual Studio App Center mentions (24)

  • Build for IOS
    Appcenter will allow you to build your app for iOS and install on your device without submitting to the App Store. https://appcenter.ms/. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Github file size limits
    We've been using app center for build distribution (https://appcenter.ms/). Source: over 2 years ago
  • A friend and I have spent way too much time sharing builds so we built this free tool!
    But, https://appcenter.ms/ and others like it are already available with generous free tiers and a lot more features (which you don't have to use, but can grow into), not to mention GitHub actions as others have noted. Does this advantages over existing, standard solutions? Source: over 2 years ago
  • Is there a service to let us run our app remotely on chosen hardware and monitor logging?
    There are lots of choices. Google android device testing. Offhand https://appcenter.ms comes to mind. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Using React Native for a cross-platform app, without a Mac
    You don t need a mac, use microsofts app center to build it. https://appcenter.ms. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Parrot QA mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Parrot QA yet. Tracking of Parrot QA recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Visual Studio App Center and Parrot QA, you can also consider the following products

TestFlight - iOS beta testing on the fly.

RainforestQA - Insanely simple testing. Create tests for your website in plain English, then run them across all major browsers with a single click. Powered by human intelligence

Buildstash - Binary build artifact and release management for software teams. For mobile and desktop apps, games, XR, or embedded - never lose a build again, steer through QA and sign-off, and manage your rollouts to stores.

Bitrise - Tens of thousands of agencies, startups and enterprise companies with mobile apps - including Runkeeper, Grindr, Duolingo and more - use Bitrise to automate their way to increased productivity & speed

Setapp - Your shortcut to prime apps on Mac, an App Store alternative

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.