Software Alternatives & Startups

Vis VS Pharo

Compare Vis VS Pharo and see what are their differences

Vis

A vi-like editor based on Plan 9's structural regular expressions.

Rating
0 reviews
Pharo

Pharo is a pure object-oriented programming language and a powerful environment, focused on...

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

Pharo might be a bit more popular than Vis. We know about 39 links to it since March 2021 and only 38 links to Vis.

social mentions
38 vs 39
Text Editors popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
72 vs 141

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Vis
Pharo
Website github.com pharo.org
Pricing
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Vis 6 features
Pharo 5 features
  • Efficiency
    Vis is designed to be a highly efficient, text-based editor that operates with low resource consumption, making it suitable for use on systems with limited hardware resources.
  • Modal Editing
    Inspired by Vim, Vis offers modal editing, which allows users to switch between different modes for inserting text and manipulating files, providing a powerful and efficient workflow.
  • Keyboard-centric Interface
    Vis, like Vim, emphasizes the use of keyboard shortcuts to navigate and edit text, which can lead to faster and more efficient text editing once mastered.
  • Configurable
    Vis is highly configurable, allowing users to customize and extend its functionalities to suit their specific needs and preferences.
  • Scripting Support
    Vis supports Lua scripting, which enables users to automate tasks and extend the editor's functionality with custom scripts.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project hosted on GitHub, Vis allows users to contribute to its development and customize the code to fit their needs.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Like other modal editors, Vis can be difficult for new users to learn, especially if they are accustomed to graphical editors or those without modal interfaces.
  • Limited Documentation
    Compared to more established editors like Vim, Vis has less extensive documentation and fewer tutorials, which can pose challenges for users attempting to learn or troubleshoot.
  • Smaller Community
    Vis has a smaller user community compared to editors like Vim and Emacs, which may result in less community support and fewer resources available online.
  • Less Mature Ecosystem
    Being a relatively newer project, Vis lacks the extensive plugin ecosystem that other editors, such as Vim, offer, limiting the availability of ready-to-use extensions.
  • Limited Platform Support
    Currently, Vis might not be as well-supported on all operating systems or platforms, which can limit its usability for some users.
  • Integrated Development Environment
    Pharo offers a highly integrated development environment with powerful tools like the inspector, debugger, and playgrounds, enhancing the overall development experience.
  • Live Code Changes
    Pharo supports live coding, allowing developers to make changes and see the effects immediately without the need to stop and restart the application.
  • Rich Libraries
    Pharo comes with a comprehensive set of libraries and frameworks, reducing the need to search for external dependencies and allowing for rapid development.
  • Object-Oriented Language
    Pharo is a true object-oriented language, which makes it natural for modeling real-world scenarios and leveraging the power of polymorphism and inheritance.
  • Community and Support
    Pharo has an active and supportive community that contributes to continuous improvements, tutorials, documentation, and libraries.

Possible disadvantages

  • Niche Ecosystem
    Pharo's ecosystem is relatively small compared to more mainstream programming languages, which might make it harder to find libraries, tools, and examples for specific needs.
  • Learning Curve
    Pharo can have a steep learning curve, especially for developers not familiar with Smalltalk or the unique aspects of its environment.
  • Limited Job Market
    Compared to more popular languages like JavaScript or Python, the job market for Pharo developers is limited, potentially making it less attractive for career-oriented developers.
  • Performance Constraints
    While suitable for many kinds of applications, Pharo’s performance might not be on par with languages specifically optimized for high-performance computing or low-level system programming.
  • Documentation
    Although improving, Pharo's documentation may not be as extensive or as easy to navigate as that of more widely-used programming languages, which can be challenging for new users.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Vis
Pharo

No analysis of Vis yet.

Overall verdict

  • Pharo is generally considered good, especially for developers who appreciate a clean, object-oriented programming environment. Its benefits include ease of use, powerful development tools, and an active support community, which make it a strong candidate for many programming projects.

Why this product is good

  • Pharo is an open-source, dynamically-typed programming language and environment that is focused on simplicity and immediate feedback. It's built around the idea of live coding and offers powerful tools for software development, including a modern version of the Smalltalk language. It is particularly appreciated for its elegant syntax, object-oriented design, and innovative development environment which allows for immediate testing and debugging. Pharo also has a strong and active community, providing support and a library of resources and packages.

Recommended for

  • Developers interested in object-oriented programming
  • Individuals looking for a live coding environment
  • Educational purposes and teaching programming concepts
  • Projects that require rapid prototyping and iteration
  • Developers who enjoy experimenting with new languages and paradigms

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Vis 3 videos + Add
Pharo 1 video + Add

Vis 35 Radom Review & Range Test

More videos

  • - Ending Explained! Locked Up (Vis A Vis: El Oasis) | Review | Netflix
  • - Polish Vis 35 - the best pistol of WWII?

Black Ops 3 In Depth: Pharo Burst Fire SMG Review (Best SMG?)

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Vis
Pharo
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
IDE
0% 0%
0% 0%
OOP
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Vis and Pharo. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Vis 38 mentions
Pharo 39 mentions
  • How do you use Vim in the era of AI?
    Moved on to vis a few years ago and never looked back to vim/neovim. Granted, it doesn't have all the sparkles of the former, but it's way leaner and snappier - and you can tell there's no ai in it. https://github.com/martanne/vis. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Show HN: An opinionated fork of micro, built for vibe coders who enjoy code
    > thicc — a fork of micro that's heavy on opinions, not bloat. > What is thicc? File browser. Editor. Terminal. AI tools. One vibe. I don't follow. That seems to be heavy on bloat. Or maybe I'm just happy with vis... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Ad: An Adaptable Text Editor
    People should be aware of two related editors: https://anvil-editor.net/ is an editor more directly inspired by and similar to Acme (but makes no attempt to borrow from Vim). - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

View more

  • Hoot: Scheme on WebAssembly
    If someone wants to try it out, both Glamorous Toolkit and plain Pharo have tooling that allows integration of both local and remote LLM services. Some links to start off with: https://gtoolkit.com/ https://github.com/feenkcom/gt4llm... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Pharos: The Lighthouse at Alexandria
    Not to be confused with Pharo, the immersive programming experience: https://pharo.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Étoilé – desktop built on GNUStep
    Are you using Pharo already? If not, give it a go: https://pharo.org/ For taking notes and stuff you'd otherwise do in Jupyter or Livebook, try GT: https://gtoolkit.com/ It's not an OS, but you can just abstract over OS actions within... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

View more

Alternatives to Vis and Pharo

When comparing Vis and Pharo, you can also consider the following products.

  • Micro

    Modern terminal-based text editor

    Compare Micro to Vis or Pharo:

  • C++

    Has imperative, object-oriented and generic programming features, while also providing the facilities for low level memory manipulation

    Compare C++ to Vis or Pharo:

  • Kakoune

    Vim inspired — Faster as in less keystrokes — Multiple selections — Orthogonal design

    Compare Kakoune to Vis or Pharo:

  • Smalltalk

    Smalltalk is an object-oriented programming (OOP) language. It is objects all the way down.

    Compare Smalltalk to Vis or Pharo:

  • acme

    Acme is a powerful text editor, development environment and textual-user-interface platform...

    Compare acme to Vis or Pharo:

  • F#

    F# is a mature, open source, cross-platform, functional-first programming language.

    Compare F# to Vis or Pharo: