Software Alternatives & Startups

Vim VS VisualEditor

Compare Vim VS VisualEditor and see what are their differences

Vim

Highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
VisualEditor

VisualEditor gives you the ability to edit without needing to learn wikitext markup, as is required by the default wikitext editor.

Rating
0 reviews

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Vim seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 10 times since March 2021.

social mentions
10 vs 0
Text Editors popularity
99% vs 1%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 23

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Vim
VE
VisualEditor
Website vim.org mediawiki.org
Pricing
Open source
—
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Vim 6 features
VE
VisualEditor 5 features
  • Efficiency
    Once learned, Vim can significantly speed up text editing with its modal editing, keyboard shortcuts, and commands that allow for quick navigation and manipulation of text.
  • Lightweight
    Vim is a very lightweight editor, consuming minimal system resources, making it highly performant even on systems with lower specifications.
  • Customizability
    Vim is highly configurable and extensible through plugins and user-defined settings, allowing users to tailor the editor to their specific needs.
  • Ubiquity
    Vim is available on almost every Unix-like system and even on Windows, making it a ubiquitous tool that you can rely on being available in most environments.
  • Support for Multiple Programming Languages
    Vim supports a wide range of programming languages out of the box and offers syntax highlighting, which can be enhanced through plugins.
  • Powerful Search and Replace
    Vim offers robust searching and replacing functionalities, including support for regular expressions, which can be a powerful tool for developers.

Possible disadvantages

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Vim's modal editing and extensive set of commands can be daunting for new users, requiring significant time and effort to master.
  • Minimal Default Config
    The default configuration of Vim is quite minimalistic, which may necessitate additional setup and customization to meet modern development needs.
  • Limited GUI
    Vim primarily operates in a terminal, and while there are graphical variants like GVim, they are not as feature-rich or user-friendly as modern GUI editors.
  • Plugin Management
    While Vim is highly extensible, managing and configuring plugins can be cumbersome compared to more modern editors that offer integrated plugin management.
  • Inconsistent Behavior Across Platforms
    There may be inconsistencies in behavior or available features of Vim across different operating systems, which can complicate its use in certain environments.
  • Lack of Integrated Modern Features
    Vim lacks some modern IDE features like integrated debugging, advanced code introspection, and refined autocompletion, which often require third-party plugins to achieve.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    VisualEditor provides a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) interface, making it more accessible for users who are not familiar with wiki markup language.
  • Real-Time Editing Feedback
    Changes are immediately visible, allowing users to see how their edits will appear on the page without the need to preview separately.
  • Reduces Entry Barrier
    By simplifying the editing process, VisualEditor invites more contributors who might be intimidated by traditional editing methods.
  • Improved Accessibility
    It enhances accessibility for people with disabilities, as navigating and editing are more straightforward with the visual cues provided.
  • Consistent Style Guide
    Helps maintain a consistent style across articles by embedding templates and standard formats directly into the editing process.

Possible disadvantages

  • Performance Issues
    VisualEditor can sometimes be slower to load and operate compared to the traditional wikitext editor, especially on large pages.
  • Limited Features
    While convenient, VisualEditor may lack some advanced features available in the traditional markup editor, restricting power users' capabilities.
  • Occasional Bugs
    As with any complex software, users may encounter bugs or glitches that disrupt the editing process.
  • Higher Resource Demand
    VisualEditor requires more computing resources, which can be problematic for users with older devices or slower internet connections.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Users
    Experienced users of the traditional editor might find transitioning to VisualEditor challenging due to different workflows and controls.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Vim
VE
VisualEditor

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Vim is a good text editor, especially for users who invest the time to learn its powerful commands and features. Its steep learning curve may be challenging initially, but once mastered, it significantly enhances productivity.

Why this product is good

  • Vim is considered a powerful text editor because of its efficiency and versatility. It offers extensive features, such as syntax highlighting, a robust plugin system, and support for numerous programming languages. Vim is highly configurable, enabling users to customize its environment to fit their needs. It is particularly appreciated for its speed and the ability to perform complex text manipulations using simple commands.

Recommended for

    Vim is recommended for programmers, developers, and system administrators who require a highly efficient and customizable text editing experience. It is especially useful for those who work extensively in terminal environments or need a quick, resource-light text editor for remote systems.

Overall verdict

  • VisualEditor is a solid, mature WYSIWYG editing tool for MediaWiki that lowers the barrier to wiki editing by removing the need to learn wikitext syntax, making it a good choice for wikis wanting to attract and retain non-technical contributors, though experienced wikitext editors may still prefer the traditional source editor for complex tasks.

Why this product is good

  • Provides a what-you-see-is-what-you-get (WYSIWYG) interface, making editing intuitive for users unfamiliar with wikitext markup
  • Officially developed and maintained by the Wikimedia Foundation, ensuring long-term support and integration with MediaWiki core
  • Lowers the learning curve for new editors, which helps increase contributor participation on wikis like Wikipedia
  • Supports real-time preview of formatting, tables, templates, media, and references without needing to memorize syntax
  • Includes collaborative and accessibility-friendly features such as citation tools, link suggestions, and special character insertion
  • Allows seamless switching between visual and source (wikitext) editing modes
  • Actively developed with regular updates, bug fixes, and community feedback incorporated via Wikimedia's development process
  • Free and open-source, consistent with the MediaWiki ecosystem's licensing

Recommended for

  • New or casual wiki contributors unfamiliar with wikitext syntax
  • Wikimedia projects and communities aiming to lower barriers to entry for editors
  • Organizations running internal wikis who want a more user-friendly editing experience
  • Non-technical staff or subject-matter experts contributing content without needing markup knowledge
  • Wiki administrators seeking to increase editor retention and reduce onboarding friction
  • Users who prefer visual formatting tools similar to word processors over raw markup editing

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Vim 3 videos + Add
VE
VisualEditor 1 video + Add

What Vim Is and Why You Should Learn It

More videos

  • - JAC Vapour VIM Review - JAC does a side by side mod...
  • - Jac Vapour VIM - Quick Look

Side-by-side comparison of VisualEditor loading time

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Vim
VE
VisualEditor
99% 99%
1% 1%
100% 100%
IDE
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%

User comments

Share your experience with using Vim and VisualEditor. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Vim no reviews yet
VE
VisualEditor no reviews yet
  • Boost Your Productivity with These Top Text Editors and IDEs
    convesio.com · Nov 2023

    Vim offers a variety of features like split windows, macros, and extensive customization options. It has a steep learning curve, but once you master it, you’ll be amazed at the speed and productivity it brings to your...

  • 13 Best Text Editors to Speed up Your Workflow
    kinsta.com · Sep 2023

    It’s tough to say which developers would enjoy Vim as a text editor. It’s an old system with an outdated interface. Yet, it still has the charm and powerful feature-set that the average developer needs. I would...

  • 12 Best LaTeX Editors You Should Use
    beebom.com · Dec 2021

    The entire installation process is perfectly documented on their Sourceforge page, which you must definitely pay a visit. There is another standalone Vim software, known as the gVim that brings a GUI-based interface...

View more

We have no reviews of VisualEditor yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Vim 10 mentions
VE
VisualEditor 0 mentions
  • regular Vim has lua?!
    Lua is quite small, encouraging distros to include it. The ubuntu gvim has, and the gvim AppImage linked from vim.org does. The default Makefile from github is set up to not include it, but you can uncomment one line there to get it. Source: over 3 years ago
  • is there a way to make highlighted text persistent after quit when using something like [match Search /\%'.line('.').'l/] ?
    I've not used vimwiki locally (tho I'm old enough to remember the Vim wiki on vim.org :), but I think what you are wanting to do is extend vimwiki's syntax file. I presume it installs one at $VIMRUNTIM/syntax or or ~/.vim/syntax. If... Source: almost 4 years ago
  • vim.org - Is there a reason for this 1800s-esque design?
    Vim.org has 242k total visitors, tailwindcss.com has 4.4m, planetscale.com has 412k, jpl.nasa.gov has 2.6m, all built with Tailwind, all several years younger than Vim's website. Unnecessary comparison, unnecessary defence. It's a... Source: about 4 years ago

View more

Tracking VisualEditor since Mar 2021.

Alternatives to Vim and VisualEditor

When comparing Vim and VisualEditor, you can also consider the following products.