
Supermemory
MemoryLake
Mem0
Docmancer.dev
SAME (Stateless Agent Memory Engine)
TheSecondBrain.dev
Shared AI memory for Claude, Codex, Cursor, OpenClaw, Hermes and other supported clients. Connect each tool to Vilix AI via MCP and continue with saved context.

FriendlyData
Infer SQL queries from plain-text questions and table headers.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, mlsql seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 2 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | vilix.ai | github.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Listed in |
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Vilix AI yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


Share your experience with using Vilix AI and mlsql. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking Vilix AI since Sep 2026.
I am working on a project that requires me to take user input (as English) and return SQL queries. We will eventually be working with multiple datasets, which is why the valuenet over at https://github.com/paulfitz/mlsql ended up being... Source: over 4 years ago
I found this great resource here: https://github.com/paulfitz/mlsql. Source: almost 5 years ago
When comparing Vilix AI and mlsql, you can also consider the following products.

Every AI you use forgets you tomorrow. MemoryLake never will.
Compare MemoryLake to Vilix AI or mlsql:


An AI-agent memory harness: shared memory for coding agents
Compare Docmancer.dev to Vilix AI or mlsql:

Your AI picks up where it left off. One memory across Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, and every MCP tool. Local, private, zero cloud. Memory with provenance.
Compare SAME (Stateless Agent Memory Engine) to Vilix AI or mlsql: