Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Vifm VS AppWrite

Compare Vifm VS AppWrite and see what are their differences

Appark.ai
Free app market analytics tool for growth and competition insights. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Vifm logo Vifm

Vifm is a ncurses based file manager with vi like keybindings.

AppWrite logo AppWrite

Appwrite provides web and mobile developers with a set of easy-to-use and integrate REST APIs to manage their core backend needs.
  • Vifm Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-09
  • AppWrite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-28

Vifm features and specs

  • Efficient Keyboard Navigation
    Vifm is designed to be navigated using the keyboard, which can significantly speed up file management tasks for users who are proficient with keyboard shortcuts.
  • Vim-Like Interface
    For users familiar with Vim, the interface and command structure of Vifm will be intuitive, reducing the learning curve and providing a seamless experience.
  • Customizability
    Vifm offers extensive customization options, allowing users to tailor the file manager to their specific preferences and workflow.
  • Lightweight
    Vifm is relatively light on system resources, making it a good choice for systems with limited resources or users who prefer minimal software.
  • Dual Pane View
    The dual-pane view in Vifm facilitates efficient file operations like moving and copying files between directories.
  • Scriptable
    Vifm supports scripting, which allows for automation of repetitive tasks and integration with other tools.

Possible disadvantages of Vifm

  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users, especially those not familiar with Vim, may find Vifm difficult to learn and use effectively.
  • Limited GUI Features
    Vifm primarily operates in a terminal environment and lacks some of the graphical user interface features found in other file managers.
  • Dependency on Terminal
    As a terminal-based application, Vifm depends on terminal access, which might not be convenient for all users or scenarios.
  • Less Intuitive for Non-Vim Users
    Users who are not familiar with Vim may find the command structure and navigation unintuitive and challenging to adapt to.
  • Documentation
    While functional, the documentation for Vifm can sometimes be insufficient, leading to difficulties in troubleshooting and feature exploration.

AppWrite features and specs

  • Open Source
    AppWrite is an open-source platform, allowing developers to inspect, modify, and contribute to the code base, ensuring transparency and flexibility.
  • Self-Hosted
    Being self-hosted, AppWrite gives developers complete control over their data and server environment, enhancing security and customization options.
  • Comprehensive Backend
    AppWrite offers a wide range of backend services out-of-the-box, including authentication, database management, storage, and serverless functions, reducing the need for additional third-party services.
  • Multi-Language Support
    AppWrite supports various programming languages, which makes it versatile and developer-friendly, allowing the integration with different tech stacks.
  • Community and Documentation
    AppWrite has an active community and well-documented guides, tutorials, and API references, which are essential for learning and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of AppWrite

  • Resource Intensive
    Being a self-hosted solution, AppWrite may require significant server resources for optimal performance, which can be costly.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for those less experienced with server management.
  • Limited Third-Party Integrations
    As compared to some other backend-as-a-service (BaaS) platforms, AppWrite has fewer pre-built third-party integrations, which might limit its extensibility.
  • Newer and Evolving
    AppWrite is relatively new and still evolving, which can mean fewer features compared to more mature platforms and the potential for more bugs.
  • Maintenance Responsibility
    Since it is self-hosted, the responsibility for server maintenance, updates, and security falls solely on the user, which can be a drawback for smaller teams or solo developers.

Analysis of Vifm

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Vifm is a good choice for users who prefer command-line tools and vi-like interfaces. It is powerful and highly customizable, making it suitable for users who value efficiency and productivity. However, it may have a steeper learning curve for those unfamiliar with vi keybindings or command-line interfaces.

Why this product is good

  • Vifm is highly regarded for its efficiency and flexibility as a file manager, especially for users comfortable with vi-like keybindings. It integrates well into a terminal-based workflow, allowing seamless navigation and file operations without leaving the command line. Customization options and the ability to work with multiple panes enhance productivity for advanced users. Its reliance on keyboard shortcuts rather than mouse interactions can be a significant advantage for those accustomed to command-line environments.

Recommended for

  • Linux users who frequently use the terminal
  • Developers or system administrators who like vi-style interfaces
  • Users looking for a customizable and lightweight file manager
  • Power users who appreciate keyboard-driven workflows

Analysis of AppWrite

Overall verdict

  • AppWrite is a solid option for developers looking for an open-source backend solution with robust features. Its well-documented APIs and active community support make it a viable choice for both small projects and growing applications.

Why this product is good

  • AppWrite is considered a good choice, particularly for its comprehensive backend-as-a-service (BaaS) features that cater to web and mobile developers. It provides a suite of services such as user authentication, databases, file storage, and serverless functions, allowing developers to streamline their development process. Its open-source nature means developers have access to the full code base and the community-drive contributions, ensuring transparency and continuous improvements. AppWrite also emphasizes developer experience, offering easy integration with client-side SDKs and providing extensive documentation.

Recommended for

    AppWrite is recommended for developers building applications who require a scalable backend solution without the overhead of managing infrastructure. It is particularly suited for developers who prefer open-source platforms and those who want to avoid vendor lock-in. AppWrite's features make it a good fit for startups, hobby projects, and even educational purposes where full control over the backend is desirable.

Vifm videos

+ Add

vifm - The Terminal File Manager For The Vim-Centric User

More videos:

  • Review - Icons And Image Previews In Vifm, Plus Xterm Is Great!
  • Review - vifm - Vi File Manager - Linux TUI

AppWrite videos

No AppWrite videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Vifm and AppWrite)

Vifm

AppWrite

FTP Client
100 100%
FTP Client
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
File Manager
100 100%
File Manager
0% 0
Backend As A Service
0 0%
Backend As A Service
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Vifm and AppWrite. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Vifm and AppWrite

Vifm Reviews

We have no reviews of Vifm yet.
Be the first one to post

AppWrite Reviews

  1. dndiel
    Appwrite is awesome, free and open-source!

    I've use it instead of Firebase on a 15$ DigitalOcean droplet and saved around ~$150 a month. Managing my own infra does take some extra time, but definitely worth it. The APIs and SDK are also surprisingly much easier to consume than Firebase. Waiting for the cloud version.

    ๐Ÿ Competitors: Firebase
    ๐Ÿ‘ Pros:    Easy to use|Cost effective|Open-source|Great user experience|Super simple|Self hosted
    ๐Ÿ‘Ž Cons:    Self hosted
10 Top Firebase Alternatives to Ignite Your Development in 2024
Appwriteโ€™s self-hosted nature gives you complete control over your data and infrastructure, great for those who are security-conscious. It also offers a comprehensive set of features, including user authentication, database management, storage, cloud functions, and more. Itโ€™s like having your very own Firebase, but on your terms.
Source: genezio.com
Top 7 Firebase Alternatives for App Development in 2024
Appwrite is an open-source backend-as-a-service platform that provides a comprehensive set of tools and APIs to help developers build modern applications. It focuses on simplicity and developer experience.
Source: signoz.io
Best Serverless Backend Tools of 2023: Pros & Cons, Features & Code Examples
Appwrite is a self-hosted BaaS platform giving you all the tools you need to build all sorts of application.
Source: www.rowy.io
2023 Firebase Alternatives: Top 10 Open-Source & Free
Appwrite permits the development to benefit from its open-source version without paying anything. However, its official website also declares that it will share the pricing details for Appwrite Cloud soon.
Source: digitalcruch.com
12 Best Open-source Database Backend Server and Google Firebase Alternatives
Appwrite is a self-hosted backend server for building web, mobile and desktop apps. It supports multiple applications natively without hacks or workarounds.It features a dashboard for apps, database, user, functions and storage management, real-time analytics per project, live connections monitor, background tasks and webhooks.Appwrite also is suitable for creating Geo-data...
Source: medevel.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AppWrite seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 178 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Vifm mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Vifm yet. Tracking of Vifm recommendations started around Mar 2021.

AppWrite mentions (178)

  • Creating a Chatbot that actually Stands Out! (vibe coded version)๐Ÿฆ–
    Initially, I was using the Supabase free tier, but I was hitting the limits, and my app was becoming stale. Then I switched to Appwrite. Both are totally different; one is SQL, while the latter one is NoSQL. Although use node-appwrite package to skip the manual schema add-ons. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • The future of coding: Cursor, AI, and the rise of backend automation with Appwrite
    Appwrite is an open-source platform that simplifies backend setup by providing authentication, databases, storage, functions, and hosting all in one place. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • How to Use Appwrite in Android Jetpack Compose
    I love Appwrite. My first hackathon was actually from Appwrite (using Appwrite) 2 years ago, and I've been using it ever since. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: Who is hiring? (July 2025)
    Appwrite | Remote | Platform Engineers, AI, Interns | https://www.appwrite.careers Appwrite (https://appwrite.io) is an open-source backend platform that helps developers build secure web and mobile apps faster. Weโ€™re hiring engineers across multiple teams to improve infrastructure, expand developer tooling, and scale our platform. Open roles: โ€“ Platform Engineer. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Build a React File Sharing App with Granular Access Controls (ReBAC)
    Appwrite is a backend-as-a-service platform that provides authentication, storage, and database. Appwrite is used for authentication and storage. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Vifm and AppWrite, you can also consider the following products

Midnight Commander - GNU Midnight Commander is a visual file manager, licensed under GNU General Public License and...

Supabase - An open source Firebase alternative

fman - An unexpected gift. January 07, 2018 by Michael. One of the nice things that happened last week was an fman user writing in to say that 1) fman "is THE BEST SOFTWARE" (sic). And that 2) he would like to send me a $50 tip.

Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.

Krusader - Krusader is an advanced twin panel (commander style) file manager for KDE and other desktops in the *nix world, similar to Midnight or Total Commander.โ€ŽGet your copy of the Krusader .

Clerk - Clerk.io, the artificial intelligence for e-commerce that knows your customers interests.

Loading...