Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

UserTesting.com VS rrweb

Compare UserTesting.com VS rrweb and see what are their differences

UserTesting.com logo UserTesting.com

Usability testing has never been easier. Get videos of real people speaking their thoughts as they use websites, mobile apps, prototypes and more!

rrweb logo rrweb

#1 open source session recording & replay library
  • UserTesting.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-27

UserTesting enables every organization to deliver the best customer experience powered by human insight. With UserTesting’s on-demand Human Insight Platform, companies across industries make accurate customer-first decisions at every level, at the speed business demands.

  • rrweb Example recording of the rrweb dashboard
    Example recording of the rrweb dashboard //
    2026-07-21

Embeddable session replay infrastructure on the open source library the industry standardized on. Record and replay sessions inside your own product, through an unbranded SDK and API.

UserTesting.com

$ Details
Free Trial
Release Date
2007 January
Startup details
Country
United States
State
California
Founder(s)
Darrell Benatar
Employees
500 - 999

UserTesting.com features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    The platform is user-friendly and easy to navigate, making it simple for users to set up tests and analyze results.
  • Quality of Feedback
    Provides high-quality, detailed feedback from real users, which can be instrumental in improving user experience.
  • Quick Turnaround Time
    Enables rapid collection of feedback, often providing results within hours, which is ideal for iterative testing and fast-paced development cycles.
  • Diverse Participant Pool
    Offers access to a broad and diverse range of participants, ensuring that feedback is representative of different demographics and user types.
  • Comprehensive Analytics
    Includes robust analytics tools that help users make sense of the data collected and draw actionable insights.
  • Customizable Tests
    Allows for the creation of highly customizable tests to fit specific research needs and objectives.
  • Video Feedback
    Participants provide video recordings of their sessions, offering visual and contextual insights into user interactions.

Possible disadvantages of UserTesting.com

  • Cost
    The platform can be expensive, making it less accessible for smaller businesses or startups with limited budgets.
  • Participant Dropout
    There can be instances of participants dropping out of tests, which may require rescheduling and cause delays.
  • Limited Session Duration
    Testing sessions are often limited in duration, which might not be sufficient for more comprehensive or complex tests.
  • Dependency on External Participants
    The quality and reliability of the feedback are dependent on the external participant pool, which can sometimes be inconsistent.
  • Learning Curve
    While the platform is generally user-friendly, there can still be a learning curve for users unfamiliar with UX research methodologies.

rrweb features and specs

  • Full Video Recording Capability
    rrweb can record and replay the whole web app experience through videos, allowing for comprehensive playback of user interactions.
  • High Fidelity Replays
    It captures almost all kinds of interactions and DOM state changes, offering very accurate reproduction of user sessions.
  • Event Compression
    The tool employs efficient event compression techniques, reducing the size of data files while maintaining detailed interactions.
  • Modular Architecture
    Its modular architecture allows developers to customize and extend functionalities according to specific needs by adding or removing plugins.
  • Open Source
    rrweb is open source, making it accessible for anyone to use, modify, or contribute to, which fosters a collaborative development environment.

Analysis of UserTesting.com

Overall verdict

  • UserTesting.com is generally considered a good tool for businesses looking to conduct user research and usability testing. Its platform is user-friendly and it provides high-quality, actionable insights. However, its suitability may vary depending on the specific requirements of a project, such as budget constraints and target audience.

Why this product is good

  • UserTesting.com is a popular platform for gaining insights into user experience by allowing businesses to watch real users interact with their products or websites. It offers valuable video-based feedback from a diverse group of testers, which can help identify pain points, improve usability, and enhance customer satisfaction.

Recommended for

  • Product managers seeking to understand user interactions
  • UI/UX designers needing feedback on design elements
  • Marketing teams aiming to improve customer engagement
  • Businesses of various sizes looking to enhance their digital platforms

UserTesting.com videos

Testing out UserTesting.com (LEGIT SIDE HUSTLE?!?)

rrweb videos

No rrweb videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to UserTesting.com and rrweb)
User Experience
94 94%
6% 6
Web Analytics
0 0%
100% 100
Usability
100 100%
0% 0
Heatmaps
0 0%
100% 100

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing UserTesting.com and rrweb.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

rrweb's answer:

Most session replay vendors are building on the engine we maintain. Choosing rrweb means owning that layer directly.

What that gets you in practice: events are plain JSON, so you store them in your own S3, Postgres or stream, keep them in the EU, and delete them on your own schedule. There's no lock-in at the recorder, because if you leave rrweb Cloud your recordings still replay in an open source player. And the plugin API lets you capture things a closed SaaS recorder will never expose, including canvas, WebGL and custom event types.

Where a competitor wins: if you want replay bundled with product analytics, error monitoring and heatmaps in one dashboard, and you never want to think about infrastructure, a full suite like PostHog or Sentry does more out of the box. Several of them sponsor rrweb, and we'd rather people use the right tool than the closest one.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

rrweb's answer:

Two groups.

Product engineers who need replay inside something they're already building: bug reporting, customer support tooling, QA, AI agent observability, interactive demos. They install the library, own the pipeline, and want format-level control.

Platform teams at companies whose product is replay, or includes it. Observability vendors, analytics suites, co-browsing and customer experience tools. They embed rrweb as the capture layer instead of writing a recorder from scratch, which takes years to get right across browsers, shadow DOM, canvas, iframes and web components.

What's the story behind your product?

rrweb's answer:

rrweb started in 2018 as one engineer's side project. Yanzhen Yu wanted to record and replay what users actually did in a browser, and published the result under MIT. There's a short documentary about how it came together, in Chinese with English subtitles.

Adoption moved faster than anyone planned for. A core team formed around the project in 2020, and Justin Halsall (Amsterdam), Eoghan Murray (Dublin) and Yun Feng (San Francisco) maintain it today alongside more than 100 contributors. The library now sits at close to 20,000 stars and powers the replay features inside some of the largest observability and analytics products on the market.

The awkward part of that success is that an MIT library carrying replay for billion-dollar companies was still being maintained on evenings and weekends. rrweb Cloud exists to fix that. It's the hosted version of the project, built by the maintainers, based in Amsterdam, and the logic is simple: revenue from Cloud pays for maintainer time on the open source library.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

rrweb's answer:

The library is roughly 89% TypeScript, deliberately so. Record and replay share a strongly typed event schema, and those types are the contract between the two sides. The remainder is JavaScript, HTML test fixtures, and Svelte for the player UI.

Four packages:

rrweb-snapshot, which serializes the DOM and its state into a JSON tree and rebuilds it rrweb, the record and replay functions rrdom, a virtual DOM that makes replay faster and testable headlessly rrweb-player, the player UI

Underneath it leans on browser primitives: MutationObserver for DOM changes, event listeners for input, scroll and pointer activity, CSSOM for stylesheet state, and patched canvas contexts for 2D and WebGL capture. Events are plain JSON, optionally packed for transport.

Build and test tooling is Yarn, Turborepo, Vite, Vitest, Puppeteer for integration tests, and Changesets for releases. MIT licensed throughout.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

rrweb's answer:

Sentry Datadog PostHog Amplitude Mixpanel New Relic Pendo Highlight Browserbase StatCounter Requestly Gleap Bird Eats Bug Navattic CUX UXWizz Analyzee SmartX

Sentry, PostHog, Pendo and Highlight also fund the project as sponsors on OpenCollective.

What makes your product unique?

rrweb's answer:

rrweb is the recording engine most session replay products are built on. Sentry, PostHog, Pendo, Highlight, Mixpanel, Datadog, Amplitude and New Relic all ship replay built on rrweb or its approach.

It serializes the DOM into a typed JSON event stream: one full snapshot, then timestamped incremental mutations. There is no video. Replay rebuilds the actual page in a browser, so text stays selectable, CSS re-renders at any viewport, and a three-minute session weighs kilobytes instead of megabytes. Because the output is structured JSON, an LLM can read a session directly without a vision model in the loop.

It's MIT licensed with close to 20,000 GitHub stars, so the capture layer is yours to own. rrweb Cloud is the hosted backend from the same maintainers, for teams who don't want to run ingestion, storage and replay infrastructure themselves.

User comments

Share your experience with using UserTesting.com and rrweb. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare UserTesting.com and rrweb

UserTesting.com Reviews

10 Best Canny Alternatives and Competitors in 2025
The best way to understand your users is to put yourself in their shoes. With UserTesting, see what your customers see when they use your products and dive into user feedback to build products they’ll use daily. 🎯
Source: clickup.com
11 Hotjar alternatives and competitors in 2024
UserTesting is a UX research tool that allows users to gain user insights via video feedback. UX teams can use the UserTesting panel to hire testers and delegate tasks to uncover how users interact with their product.
Source: maze.co
10 Best Hotjar Alternatives & Competitors in 2023
Plus, users can not reach any visualized data on the UserTesting dashboard and this makes it rather difficult to understand what exactly is going on on a website.
Best 8 Affordable UserZoom Alternatives in 2023
A vast quantity of worthless responses is the platform’s biggest and most noticeable downside. While UserTesting has a large volunteer pool, it appears that a considerable number of them are not qualified to participate in meaningful research. Some respondents are impatient, cheat, or appear to be uninterested in the procedure, all of which detracts from the overall...
UserTesting vs UserZoom: Pick the right user research software in 2022
Both Usertesting and UserZoom do not have a public pricing page. Their price is available upon request and you need to register for a demo. Then a sales representative will reach out to schedule an introductory demo call with you. After the call, you are usually given an estimate and a second sales call follows. The process of acquiring and registering for a subscription...

rrweb Reviews

We have no reviews of rrweb yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, UserTesting.com seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 101 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

UserTesting.com mentions (101)

  • Low-cost, one-off unmoderated usability testing platforms
    Lookback, Usability Hub (now called Lyssna) and Validately but have been spoiled by former employers who had the budget for usertesting.com so I'm pretty out of the loop on low-budget options. TIA! Source: over 2 years ago
  • Interview recruiting?
    I need to recruit 5-6 parents/grandparents for a study and I'm having trouble finding a company I can use (aside from usertesting.com since they tailor to large companies and I'm doing freelance work). Every company I've come across offers recruitment for surveys, but not interviews. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • iOS User Testing App Won't Open
    Anyone else having problems with the iOS UserTesting App? Mine just opens and shows the logo, and stays there. I can see multiple tests available on usertesting.com, but can't open the app. I have a iPhone 13, updated to 17.1. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • 🚀 Improve Your Site; Get Expert Reviews On Your Creation!
    User Testing Services: Platforms like UserTesting Human Insight Platform | Improve Customer Experience (CX) allow you to get feedback from real users who provide insights on usability, design, and user experience. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Is MTurk worth it for new users? (ZERO rejections, either...)
    Try usertesting.com, it fits into your schedule better. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

rrweb mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of rrweb yet. Tracking of rrweb recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing UserTesting.com and rrweb, you can also consider the following products

TestRail - TestRail provides comprehensive test case management for software testing. Organize your testing, boost productivity, get real-time insights, and track progress toward milestones. Integrates with leading issue tracking and test automation tools.

Loom - Loom is a screen recording extension for Chrome that gives people the ability to create and share media. Create your own videos using your camera, screen view, and audio. Read more about Loom.

Hotjar - The #1 Leader in Heatmaps, Recordings, Surveys & More. Sign up for a 15-day free trial and start learning from real user behavior today!

Smartlook - Qualitative analytics for websites and mobile apps Start understanding the 'whys' of your users' behaviors with clear, visual insights. With session recordings and event tracking, you get the complete picture.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

SessionStack - Record and replay web app issues. See them the way they happened to end users.