Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Usage AI VS AppWrite

Compare Usage AI VS AppWrite and see what are their differences

Usage AI logo Usage AI

Usage's Automated Reserved Instance Manager buys/sells Flex RIs(3-yr-no-upfront RIs under the hood) to maximize your coverage and minimize your compute spend - up to a maximum 57% savings!

AppWrite logo AppWrite

Appwrite provides web and mobile developers with a set of easy-to-use and integrate REST APIs to manage their core backend needs.
  • Usage AI Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-28
  • AppWrite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-28

Usage AI features and specs

  • Cost Optimization
    Usage AI helps businesses optimize their cloud spending by analyzing usage patterns and providing actionable recommendations. This can lead to significant cost savings, especially for organizations with complex cloud environments.
  • Automated Recommendations
    The platform provides automated suggestions for optimizing cloud usage, making it easier for users to implement best practices without extensive manual analysis.
  • Comprehensive Reporting
    Usage AI offers detailed reports and insights into cloud usage, which can help organizations understand their spending patterns and areas for potential improvement.
  • Customizable Alerts
    Users can set up alerts for specific usage patterns or costs, allowing them to proactively manage spending and avoid unexpected charges.

Possible disadvantages of Usage AI

  • Complexity
    For smaller businesses or those with straightforward cloud environments, Usage AI's advanced features may be more complex than necessary, potentially leading to underutilization.
  • Integration Challenges
    Depending on the existing cloud infrastructure, integrating Usage AI with all relevant services could pose challenges, particularly for organizations with multiple providers.
  • Costs
    While Usage AI aims to reduce cloud spending, there might be costs associated with the usage of the platform itself, which could be a consideration for budget-conscious organizations.
  • Learning Curve
    New users of Usage AI might face a learning curve when navigating the platformโ€™s features and understanding its recommendations, potentially requiring training or support.

AppWrite features and specs

  • Open Source
    AppWrite is an open-source platform, allowing developers to inspect, modify, and contribute to the code base, ensuring transparency and flexibility.
  • Self-Hosted
    Being self-hosted, AppWrite gives developers complete control over their data and server environment, enhancing security and customization options.
  • Comprehensive Backend
    AppWrite offers a wide range of backend services out-of-the-box, including authentication, database management, storage, and serverless functions, reducing the need for additional third-party services.
  • Multi-Language Support
    AppWrite supports various programming languages, which makes it versatile and developer-friendly, allowing the integration with different tech stacks.
  • Community and Documentation
    AppWrite has an active community and well-documented guides, tutorials, and API references, which are essential for learning and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of AppWrite

  • Resource Intensive
    Being a self-hosted solution, AppWrite may require significant server resources for optimal performance, which can be costly.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for those less experienced with server management.
  • Limited Third-Party Integrations
    As compared to some other backend-as-a-service (BaaS) platforms, AppWrite has fewer pre-built third-party integrations, which might limit its extensibility.
  • Newer and Evolving
    AppWrite is relatively new and still evolving, which can mean fewer features compared to more mature platforms and the potential for more bugs.
  • Maintenance Responsibility
    Since it is self-hosted, the responsibility for server maintenance, updates, and security falls solely on the user, which can be a drawback for smaller teams or solo developers.

Analysis of AppWrite

Overall verdict

  • AppWrite is a solid option for developers looking for an open-source backend solution with robust features. Its well-documented APIs and active community support make it a viable choice for both small projects and growing applications.

Why this product is good

  • AppWrite is considered a good choice, particularly for its comprehensive backend-as-a-service (BaaS) features that cater to web and mobile developers. It provides a suite of services such as user authentication, databases, file storage, and serverless functions, allowing developers to streamline their development process. Its open-source nature means developers have access to the full code base and the community-drive contributions, ensuring transparency and continuous improvements. AppWrite also emphasizes developer experience, offering easy integration with client-side SDKs and providing extensive documentation.

Recommended for

    AppWrite is recommended for developers building applications who require a scalable backend solution without the overhead of managing infrastructure. It is particularly suited for developers who prefer open-source platforms and those who want to avoid vendor lock-in. AppWrite's features make it a good fit for startups, hobby projects, and even educational purposes where full control over the backend is desirable.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Usage AI and AppWrite)
Developer Tools
15 15%
85% 85
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Backend As A Service
0 0%
100% 100
AI
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Usage AI and AppWrite. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Usage AI and AppWrite

Usage AI Reviews

We have no reviews of Usage AI yet.
Be the first one to post

AppWrite Reviews

  1. Appwrite is awesome, free and open-source!

    I've use it instead of Firebase on a 15$ DigitalOcean droplet and saved around ~$150 a month. Managing my own infra does take some extra time, but definitely worth it. The APIs and SDK are also surprisingly much easier to consume than Firebase. Waiting for the cloud version.

    ๐Ÿ Competitors: Firebase
    ๐Ÿ‘ Pros:    Easy to use|Cost effective|Open-source|Great user experience|Super simple|Self hosted
    ๐Ÿ‘Ž Cons:    Self hosted

10 Top Firebase Alternatives to Ignite Your Development in 2024
Appwriteโ€™s self-hosted nature gives you complete control over your data and infrastructure, great for those who are security-conscious. It also offers a comprehensive set of features, including user authentication, database management, storage, cloud functions, and more. Itโ€™s like having your very own Firebase, but on your terms.
Source: genezio.com
Top 7 Firebase Alternatives for App Development in 2024
Appwrite is an open-source backend-as-a-service platform that provides a comprehensive set of tools and APIs to help developers build modern applications. It focuses on simplicity and developer experience.
Source: signoz.io
Best Serverless Backend Tools of 2023: Pros & Cons, Features & Code Examples
Appwrite is a self-hosted BaaS platform giving you all the tools you need to build all sorts of application.
Source: www.rowy.io
2023 Firebase Alternatives: Top 10 Open-Source & Free
Appwrite permits the development to benefit from its open-source version without paying anything. However, its official website also declares that it will share the pricing details for Appwrite Cloud soon.
12 Best Open-source Database Backend Server and Google Firebase Alternatives
Appwrite is a self-hosted backend server for building web, mobile and desktop apps. It supports multiple applications natively without hacks or workarounds.It features a dashboard for apps, database, user, functions and storage management, real-time analytics per project, live connections monitor, background tasks and webhooks.Appwrite also is suitable for creating Geo-data...
Source: medevel.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AppWrite seems to be a lot more popular than Usage AI. While we know about 176 links to AppWrite, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Usage AI. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Usage AI mentions (3)

  • Stop bleeding money on cloud infrastructure
    Thanks for sharing your project! Cloud costs have gotten ridiculously out of control (an Andreessen Horowitz report estimates that the excess cost of public cloud is $500 billion per year [1]) and it's great to see more projects tackling this problem. I'm curious to see if you plan on implementing automation, or if the tool is focused on recommendations? We've built a tool at Usage.AI that automatically buys and... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Comparing Bandwidth Costs of Amazon, Google and Microsoft Cloud Computing (2017)
    +1 on WalterGR's question. Google Cloud recently hiked prices (again), doubling prices for some of its services [1], though Amazon has a better track record of keeping prices steady (or even reducing them) [2]. There are also newer innovations that aren't discussed in that comparison, like Google's Commited Use Discounts and Azure Reserved VM Instances (their answers to Amazon's Reserved Instances). If you're... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Show HN: Usage, Cut your AWS Bill by 50%+ in 5 Minutes
    FYI, you didn't provide a clear link or anything. Just the privacy policy in footer. Looks like it is this: https://usage.ai. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

AppWrite mentions (176)

  • How to Use Appwrite in Android Jetpack Compose
    I love Appwrite. My first hackathon was actually from Appwrite (using Appwrite) 2 years ago, and I've been using it ever since. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Ask HN: Who is hiring? (July 2025)
    Appwrite | Remote | Platform Engineers, AI, Interns | https://www.appwrite.careers Appwrite (https://appwrite.io) is an open-source backend platform that helps developers build secure web and mobile apps faster. Weโ€™re hiring engineers across multiple teams to improve infrastructure, expand developer tooling, and scale our platform. Open roles: โ€“ Platform Engineer. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Build a React File Sharing App with Granular Access Controls (ReBAC)
    Appwrite is a backend-as-a-service platform that provides authentication, storage, and database. Appwrite is used for authentication and storage. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Flutter vs Native: Why Flutter Wins for TV App Development
    Flutter plays well with modern backend solutions like Firebase, Supabase, AWS Amplify, Appwrite, and PocketBase. This gives you a variety of options to choose from whether you are an indie developer, startup, established company, agency, or enterprise. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • 5 Tools Every Developer Must Use in 2024
    Appwrite also allows you to manage your application's backend services through a simple and intuitive dashboard, making it easy to monitor and control your resources. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Usage AI and AppWrite, you can also consider the following products

CloudFix - CloudFix is the automatic, always-running way to optimize AWS cost and performance.

Supabase - An open source Firebase alternative

ProsperOps - Cost optimization tools and expertise from the creators of AWS' largest Managed Service Provider. Our customers increase savings an average of 34%.

Firebase - Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications for mobile and web.

Cloudability - Cloudability lets you monitor, manage and communicate your cloud costs with one easy tool.

PocketBase.io - Open Source backend with realtime database, authentication, file storage and admin dashboard, all compiled in 1 portable executable.