Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

UrBackup VS Column

Compare UrBackup VS Column and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

UrBackup logo UrBackup

UrBackup is a open source client/server backup system, that through a combination of image and file...

Column logo Column

Social network built to be high-signal in a world of noise.
  • UrBackup Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-05
  • Column Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-30

UrBackup features and specs

  • Open Source
    UrBackup is open source, which means it is free to use and anyone can contribute to its development. This allows for continuous improvement and transparency.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    UrBackup supports multiple platforms, including Windows, Linux, and macOS, providing flexibility for diverse environments.
  • Incremental Backups
    The software utilizes both incremental file and image backups, which saves storage space and reduces backup times.
  • Web-Based Management Interface
    UrBackup offers a web-based interface for managing backups, providing a user-friendly and accessible way to monitor and configure the system.
  • Client and Server Versions
    The software provides both client and server versions, which can scale to different use cases, from single-user setups to larger organizational needs.
  • Fast and Efficient
    UrBackup is designed for speed, leveraging efficient algorithms to ensure that backups do not consume unnecessary resources or time.

Possible disadvantages of UrBackup

  • Complex Setup
    Initial setup can be complex for users who are not familiar with backup systems or lack technical expertise.
  • Limited Support
    As an open-source project, UrBackup may not have the robust customer support offered by commercial solutions, leading to potential challenges in troubleshooting.
  • Documentation
    While comprehensive, the documentation might not be as user-friendly or as detailed as that of some commercial backup solutions.
  • Advanced Features
    Lacks some advanced features found in competing commercial backup solutions, such as extensive cloud integration and advanced data deduplication.
  • Backup Performance
    In some cases, the performance may lag behind more optimized proprietary backup solutions, especially in large-scale deployments.

Column features and specs

  • Bank-owned infrastructure
    Column operates as a nationally chartered bank itself (Column N.A.), rather than partnering with a third-party sponsor bank. This reduces the layers of intermediaries typical in banking-as-a-service models, potentially leading to more reliable service, fewer conflicts of interest, and direct control over compliance and risk management.
  • Developer-first API design
    Column offers modern, well-documented REST APIs that are designed with engineers in mind, making it easier for fintech companies and developers to integrate banking services such as ACH, wire transfers, and account management directly into their products.
  • Direct access to payment rails
    Because Column is a chartered bank, it has direct access to Federal Reserve systems like ACH, Fedwire, and FedNow, which can result in faster processing times and more reliable payment operations compared to companies relying on indirect access through sponsor banks.
  • Experienced leadership
    Column was founded by William Hockey, co-founder of Plaid, bringing significant fintech industry experience and credibility. This background can inspire confidence among potential partners and investors regarding the platform's vision and execution capability.
  • Transparent and flexible pricing
    Column is known for offering clear, usage-based pricing models without hidden fees, which can be appealing to startups and fintechs looking for predictable costs as they scale their banking operations.

Possible disadvantages of Column

  • Limited track record
    As a relatively new entrant in the banking-as-a-service and chartered bank space, Column has less historical performance data and fewer long-term case studies compared to more established banking infrastructure providers, which may create uncertainty for risk-averse clients.
  • U.S.-only operations
    Column's banking charter and services are limited to the United States, which restricts its usefulness for companies seeking to offer banking services internationally or in multiple countries.
  • Technical integration burden
    Because Column emphasizes a developer-first, API-driven approach, companies without strong in-house engineering resources may find it challenging to implement and maintain integrations compared to more turnkey banking-as-a-service solutions.
  • Shared compliance responsibility
    While Column handles core banking compliance, partner companies still need to manage certain regulatory and compliance obligations related to their specific use cases, which can add complexity and require dedicated legal or compliance expertise.
  • Smaller ecosystem and support network
    Compared to larger, more established banking-as-a-service providers, Column may have a smaller partner ecosystem, fewer third-party integrations, and potentially less extensive customer support infrastructure, which could impact scalability for some businesses.

Analysis of Column

Overall verdict

  • Column is a well-regarded banking-as-a-service (BaaS) platform because it operates as a nationally chartered bank itself rather than relying on a separate partner bank, which simplifies compliance, reduces intermediary risk, and gives developers direct API-level access to core banking functions like payments, accounts, and card issuing.

Why this product is good

  • It is a real, chartered bank (not just a middleware layer), which reduces the multi-party risk seen in typical BaaS stacks that rely on third-party partner banks
  • Developer-first design with clean, well-documented APIs for building payments, ACH, wire transfers, card issuing, and account management
  • Backed by reputable investors (including Stripe), signaling strong technical and financial credibility
  • Direct access to the Fed and payment rails, which can mean faster settlement and fewer intermediaries
  • Transparent, predictable pricing structure compared to some legacy BaaS providers
  • Strong focus on compliance and risk infrastructure built into the platform itself

Recommended for

  • Fintech startups building embedded banking, lending, or payments products
  • Companies wanting to avoid the complexity and risk of traditional sponsor-bank BaaS relationships
  • Engineering-heavy teams that prioritize API quality and control over banking infrastructure
  • Businesses needing reliable ACH, wire, and card issuing capabilities without building their own bank relationships
  • Mid-to-large scale fintechs that need a stable, directly regulated banking partner as they grow

UrBackup videos

Best CRASHPLAN alternatives TESTED 2017 (Veeam, Urbackup, Macrium)

More videos:

  • Review - urbackup on Windows 10 & Windows Server 2019
  • Review - Full PC Image Backup with Raspberry pi / UrBackup

Column videos

No Column videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to UrBackup and Column)
File Sharing And Backup
100 100%
0% 0
CSS Framework
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Storage
100 100%
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using UrBackup and Column. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare UrBackup and Column

UrBackup Reviews

The Best Free Backup Software and Why it is Difficult to Find One
UrBackup is another example of a client/server backup solution that is free, open-source and has a very narrow scope in terms of what it is capable of performing. In this case, UrBackup is capable of performing both image-level and file backups without interrupting the system. It can also perform incremental backups with an astonishing speed and has multiple different...
Source: www.bacula.org
The Top 17 Free and Open Source Backup Solutions
UrBackup creates file and image backups while systems are running, without interrupting any ongoing processes. The software also watches folders you want backed up continuously in order to find differences to previous backups. Because of this, incremental backups are performed quickly. Files can be restored through the web interface, via the client, or the Windows explorer,...
15 Best Rclone Alternatives 2022
This is a simple open source client and server backup system. UrBackup uses image and file backups to ensure data security and to speed up restore times. In essence, this tool is exclusively for file backups.
11 Best Linux Backup Solutions
UrBackup is an easy to setup free open-source client/server system backup software that is available for multiple platforms including Linux. It allows for image and file backups as well as fast restoration time. You can set up UrBackup to continuously monitor folders in order to identify differences with previous backups allowing for a pretty fast incremental backup process....
25 Outstanding Backup Utilities for Linux Systems in 2020
UrBackup is an open-source easy to setup client/server backup system for Linux, Windows and Mac OS X, that through a mixture of image and file backups carry out both data security and speedy restoration time.
Source: www.tecmint.com

Column Reviews

We have no reviews of Column yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, UrBackup seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

UrBackup mentions (2)

  • Open Source Backup Application Linux/Raspbian Advice
    I'm currently using Urbackup (urbackup.org) which worked great on my windows server, but I made the switch to linux recently (command line only) and Urbackup seems to crash every few minutes/hours. I'm looking for everyone else's suggestions. I would love if the application created a full image back up for easy restoring, and be compatible with Windows clients at least. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Local data backups on Linux?
    If you want client/server backups, urbackup is the easiest thing I've found. Does image-based backups for Windows, supports several snapshot options for Linux filesystems, and they have a Mac agent in beta. Source: almost 5 years ago

Column mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Column yet. Tracking of Column recommendations started around Apr 2022.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing UrBackup and Column, you can also consider the following products

Restic - Easy: Doing backups should be a frictionless process, otherwise you are tempted to skip it.

Duplicati - Free backup software to store backups online with strong encryption. Works with FTP, SSH, WebDAV, OneDrive, Amazon S3, Google Drive and many others.

AOMEI Backupper - AOMEI Backupper is a software created to help a person backup, restore, clone, and sync their entire Windows system.

Acronis True Image - (Formerly Acronis True Image) Complete protection for your digital life

Duplicacy - A new generation cross-platform cloud backup tool

Macrium Reflect - Macrium Software - the creators of Macrium Reflect backup, imaging and cloning software.