Upvoty
Canny.io
UserVoice
Nolt.io
Featurebase
productboard
Frill
hellonext.co
Cppcheck
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
lgtm.com
SonarQube
VisualCodeGrepper
Flawfinder
Parasoft C/C++test
With Upvoty you are able to collect and manage valuable feedback from your users in 1 simple overview. You can also share your product roadmap to show your users what's next. Turn user feedback into actionable product optimizations! Try it for free!
Upvoty CppcheckCppcheck is recommended for C/C++ developers and development teams, particularly those responsible for maintaining large codebases or projects where code quality and reliability are paramount. It is also beneficial for educational purposes, where students and new developers can learn about potential pitfalls in C/C++ programming.
Easily migrated from another tool, our team and users are loving Upvoty thus far, now 5 months in.
We use upvoty for a few months now, every month they add some new cool features. They listen to their customers very carfully. They should be, otherwise their tool does not work :-D
I have been waiting a long time for a beautiful and easy to use feedback tool - Upvoty is it. Upvoty also nails all the little things.
This tool really helps our customers provide feedback and priorities to our Product, and Development teams. We were able to implement this directly into our app which creates a seamless experience for our users.
Based on our record, Cppcheck should be more popular than Upvoty. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
💬 User feedback: From the very start, we listened really carefully to the feedback of our users (of course by using our own product - upvoty.com). This resulted in us building a product that was valuable and people actually wanted to pay for it. Source: over 4 years ago
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: about 3 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: over 3 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: over 3 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 3 years ago
Canny.io - Canny helps you collect and organize feature requests to better understand customer needs and prioritize your roadmap.
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
UserVoice - UserVoice integrates easy-to-use feedback, helpdesk, and knowledge base management tools in one platform that empowers users to speak and companies to understand.
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
Nolt.io - A fast & beautiful way to collect user feedback
lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.