
Encrypto
EncFSMP
File Lock PEA
WinGPG
BestCrypt
FinalCrypt
TrueCrypt
Encrypt and Decrypt Unicode!

Decode and verify SSL/TLS certificates online. Extract X.509 details including issuer, validity, SAN, and fingerprint. Fast, secure, and browser-based.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Cert Decoder seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 1 time since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | windowsportableapps.blogspot.com | certdecoder.com |
| Pricing | — | |
| Platforms | — | |
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Unicode Crypter yet.
Cert Decoder is a free online tool that helps you decode X.509 SSL/TLS certificates in PEM format. It instantly shows important information like the issuer, expiry date, SAN entries, and fingerprint. All data is processed locally in your browser, so nothing is ever sent or stored elsewhere.
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


No analysis of Unicode Crypter yet.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Unicode Crypter and Cert Decoder.
Cert Decoder's answer:
I built certdecoder.com over the weekend for my own needs. Sometimes in my work, I need to verify and check certificate details.
Cert Decoder's answer:
certdecoder.com was built using just JavaScript and HTML—simple, fast, and with all processing happening locally in your browser, so no certificate data is sent to any server
Cert Decoder's answer:
certdecoder.com is primarily built for developers, sysadmins, cybersecurity enthusiasts, and DevOps engineers.
Cert Decoder's answer:
Simple, fast, and reliable. Some similar tools can’t even decode basic certificates. I rigorously tested my tool with many real-world certificates and covered several edge cases where competitors fall short.
Cert Decoder's answer:
certdecoder.com is primarily built for developers, sysadmins, cybersecurity enthusiasts, and DevOps engineers.
Share your experience with using Unicode Crypter and Cert Decoder. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


Tracking Unicode Crypter since Mar 2021.
Why? Because I built certdecoder.com and couldn’t find a decent place to submit it. So I said screw it — I’ll build my own. With blackjack and hookers. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
When comparing Unicode Crypter and Cert Decoder, you can also consider the following products.

Encrypto lets you encrypt files before sending them to friends or coworkers.
Compare Encrypto to Unicode Crypter or Cert Decoder:

EncFSMP, a program to mount EncFS folders on Windows and OS X.
Compare EncFSMP to Unicode Crypter or Cert Decoder:

Password-encryption of files and directories. File PEA encrypts files and folders with authenticated encryption to protect confidentiality and integrity. The program uses memory-hard key derivation functions to prevent custom hardware attacks.
Compare File Lock PEA to Unicode Crypter or Cert Decoder:

WinGPG – an open source encryption tool for Windows
Compare WinGPG to Unicode Crypter or Cert Decoder:

BestCrypt Container Encryption supplies painless encryption to users for any selected files or folders on active desktops, shared workstations, removable storage media drives, network storage, etc.
Compare BestCrypt to Unicode Crypter or Cert Decoder:

OpenSource Quantum Computer Resistent File Encryption
Compare FinalCrypt to Unicode Crypter or Cert Decoder: