Understand
SonarQube
Source Insight
Codacy
JArchitect
Sourcetrail
CppDepend
CodeCompass
Cppcheck
SonarQube
Clang Static Analyzer
Coverity Scan
Parasoft C/C++test
PVS-Studio
lgtm.com
Polyspace
Understand CppcheckUnderstand's answer
-C/C++ -Qt -Understand
Understand's answer
-NASA -U.S. Airforce -General Electric -Nvidia -Raytheon -Amazon -Lockheed Martin -Samsung -Raytheon -Pratt & Whitney -Dell -Intuity -Aurora Flight Sciences
Understand's answer
Understand has shares many features found in other products but all wrapped into one easy to use package. Our most defining feature is the Hyper-XREF™ technology we invented that provides a detailed cross-referencing of all the interconnections in your code.
Based on our record, Cppcheck should be more popular than Understand. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Https://lattix.com/ can produce impact reports showing “changing X affects A, B and Y on the first level which in turn affects C, D, E, F and Z on the second level” and so on… https://scitools.com/ Understand can answer similar questions and tries to perform flow analysis “through” function pointers as well. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: almost 2 years ago
For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: about 2 years ago
Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: about 2 years ago
Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 2 years ago
SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.
Source Insight - Source Insight is a programming editor & code browser with built-in live analysis for C/C++, C#, Java, and more; helping you understand large projects.
Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.
Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free
JArchitect - JArchitect is used by developers to measure, understand and improve their Java code quality.