Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

UI.Vision VS AutoHotkey

Compare UI.Vision VS AutoHotkey and see what are their differences

UI.Vision logo UI.Vision

Modern open-source task and test automation tool and Selenium IDE.

AutoHotkey logo AutoHotkey

The ultimate automation scripting language for Windows.
  • UI.Vision Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-11
  • AutoHotkey Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-13

We recommend LibHunt AutoHotkey for discovery and comparisons of trending AutoHotkey projects.

UI.Vision features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    UI.Vision is compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux, allowing users to create and run automation scripts across different operating systems.
  • Browser Integration
    The tool integrates directly with popular browsers like Chrome, Firefox, and Edge, making it easy to automate web-based tasks.
  • Open Source
    UI.Vision offers an open-source version, making it accessible for developers to modify and extend its capabilities.
  • Visual Automation
    Includes visual recognition features that allow users to create automation tasks based on images and screen elements, not just DOM elements.
  • Simplicity
    Easy-to-use interface with a focus on visual scripting, making it accessible for beginners and non-developers.
  • Flexibility
    Supports both Selenium IDE and its own command set, giving users flexibility in script creation.
  • Data-Driven Testing
    Allows users to drive automated tests with data from CSV files, spreadsheets, or SQL databases.
  • Community Support
    Being an open-source project, it has a community of users who contribute scripts, plugins, and bug fixes.

Possible disadvantages of UI.Vision

  • Learning Curve
    Although simpler than some other tools, there's still a learning curve involved, especially for users new to automation.
  • Performance
    May not be as fast as some specialized enterprise automation tools, particularly for large-scale or highly complex tasks.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    While feature-rich for most common automation needs, it may lack some advanced features found in more specialized tools.
  • Documentation
    While there is documentation available, it can be somewhat limited and may not cover all edge cases or advanced features in depth.
  • Dependency on Browser Extensions
    Heavily relies on browser extensions, which could be restrictive or less stable for some use cases.
  • Support Quality
    Official support may not be as robust or responsive as commercial tools, although community support helps mitigate this.
  • Complex Projects
    May struggle with highly complex projects requiring intricate scripting and orchestration between different systems.
  • Resource Intensive
    Can be resource-intensive, impacting performance when running multiple or complex scripts simultaneously.

AutoHotkey features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    AutoHotkey scripts are relatively easy to write, making it accessible for beginners. The syntax is straightforward and the community offers extensive documentation and scripts for reference.
  • Scripting Flexibility
    AutoHotkey allows users to perform a wide range of tasks, from simple key remappings and text expansion to more complex automation like GUI automation and web scraping.
  • Active Community
    An active and supportive community exists around AutoHotkey. This means you can find community-created libraries, examples, and forums that offer help and troubleshooting.
  • Integrations
    AutoHotkey can integrate with other programs and APIs, allowing for the extension of its capabilities beyond basic scripting.
  • Performance
    Scripts written in AutoHotkey are often very lightweight and run efficiently, making it suitable for tasks requiring quick execution and minimal lag.
  • Cost
    AutoHotkey is free to use, which makes it an attractive option for individuals and businesses looking to implement automation without a financial investment.

Possible disadvantages of AutoHotkey

  • Security Risks
    AutoHotkey scripts can be potentially harmful if used maliciously. Unsigned scripts could be seen as a security risk by antiviruses and system administrators.
  • Limited Cross-Platform Support
    AutoHotkey primarily supports Windows, and there is limited support for other operating systems like MacOS and Linux, which can be a disadvantage for cross-platform environments.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic features are easy to learn, more advanced functionalities such as using COM objects, creating complex GUIs, or interacting with APIs can have a steep learning curve.
  • Readability of Code
    As scripts become complex, the readability of AutoHotkey code may decrease, especially for those unfamiliar with the syntax. This can make maintaining large scripts challenging.
  • Lack of Formal Support
    There is no official customer support for AutoHotkey. Users must rely on community-based support, which can vary in response time and quality.
  • Debugging Tools
    AutoHotkeyโ€™s debugging tools are not as robust as those in full-fledged development environments, making it harder to troubleshoot and debug complex scripts.

Analysis of UI.Vision

Overall verdict

  • UI.Vision is generally considered a reliable and effective tool for automation tasks, particularly for those who need a versatile solution capable of handling both web-based and desktop environments. Its ease of use and extensive features make it a good option for many users, though those seeking more advanced features might want to explore other tools in conjunction with UI.Vision.

Why this product is good

  • UI.Vision is a popular choice for users looking for a flexible and powerful automation tool because it supports both browser automation and desktop automation. It offers a no-code visual approach, making it accessible to users without programming skills, and also provides robust scripting capabilities for advanced users. It's widely appreciated for its compatibility with different operating systems and its open-source nature, which allows for community contributions and customizations.

Recommended for

    UI.Vision is recommended for beginners who prefer a visual approach to automation, as well as advanced users who appreciate the ability to create detailed scripts. It's also suitable for testers and developers looking to automate repetitive tasks, streamline workflows, or perform data-driven testing without investing in expensive software.

Analysis of AutoHotkey

Overall verdict

  • Yes, AutoHotkey is considered a good tool for many users.

Why this product is good

  • AutoHotkey is highly appreciated for its simplicity and flexibility in automating repetitive tasks on Windows. It's a powerful scripting language that enables users to create custom keyboard shortcuts, automate software processes, and remap keys, among other functionalities. Its ease of use and active community support make it accessible for both beginners and experienced users.

Recommended for

  • People who frequently perform repetitive tasks on their computers.
  • Users who want to increase productivity by automating workflows.
  • Individuals looking to create custom keyboard shortcuts and remap keys.
  • Programmers and IT professionals seeking to automate software testing and deployment.
  • Anyone who wants to customize their Windows environment.

UI.Vision videos

VPN FREE 1 MONTH | MIแป„N PHร 1 THรNG VPN TแปC ฤแป˜ CAO

AutoHotkey videos

Autohotkey Quick Overview

More videos:

  • Review - AutoHotkey Review - Open2Free.com

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to UI.Vision and AutoHotkey)
Automation
24 24%
76% 76
Windows Tools
20 20%
80% 80
Scripts
19 19%
81% 81
Automated Testing
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using UI.Vision and AutoHotkey. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare UI.Vision and AutoHotkey

UI.Vision Reviews

10 n8n.io Alternatives
UI.Vision RPA is an open-source tool and selenium IDE for test automation, Web automation, screen scraping, User interface testing, desktop automation, etc. UI. Vision RPA โ€“ Image Driven Automation lets you be a part of hundreds of thousands of users and automate workflows in the browser and on your desktops. UI.Vision RPA for Firefox and Chrome is a cross-platform RPA...

AutoHotkey Reviews

Microsoft Power Automate
AutoHotkey is one of the most popular Windows alternatives that can effectively replace Microsoft Power Automate. It is a popular open source and free choice that exists to the users. As a script-generating tool, it allows its users to effortlessly build small and easy-to-complex scripts for any task. Some of the special features that AutoHotkey offers are listed below:
Top 15 Best TinyTask Alternatives in 2022
This is another tinytask alternative. With C++ programming, AutoHotkey is a versatile and open-source platform for bespoke scripting languages intended for Microsoft Windows. The software offers quick macro building as well as simple hotkeys and shortcuts for you. Windows apps that allow repetitive operations to be automated are being made more efficient via AutoHotkey. You...
15 Best AutoHotkey Alternatives 2022
While AutoHotkey is a decent tool, there are dozens of other similar and even better tools that include different features that can be a lot more versatile and easier to use. So some of the reasons why you might need an AutoHotkey alternative include lack of features, better versatility, easier use, lighter tool, or missing features.
9 Best AutoHotkey Alternative Apps
So there are a few efficient alternative apps for AutoHotkey. In this post, you will see the nine best alternatives to AutoHotkey.
Autohotkey Alternatives and Similar Free Software
You will get much similar software and alternative to AutoHotkey, and all of them have the same features, even better ones than the original. If you are not satisfied with AutoHotkey, you can always go for the alternatives, have a look!

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AutoHotkey should be more popular than UI.Vision. It has been mentiond 39 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

UI.Vision mentions (9)

  • Autotab โ€“ Boring AI Agents for real world tasks
    What distinguishes this from UI.Vision's (https://ui.vision/) session recorder? - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Missouri trans 'snitch form' down after people spammed it with the 'Bee Movie' script
    Switch over to ui.vision. I find myself needing to automate, scrape and post legitimately in my 9-5, and it's been life changing. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Money well spent
    You could go the script kiddie route and use ui.vision addons and just automate clicks, or go something more advanced and actually script it in python. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Fed up with flaky automations - are there any alternative programs?
    You might look at UiVision RPA. https://ui.vision/. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • How can I find companies paying for PPC ads?
    Probably not the cleanest method but you could do some easy scraping using the "web scrapper" addon on Chrome and a basic macro with Macro recorder or UIvision. (both free and damn efficient). Source: over 3 years ago
View more

AutoHotkey mentions (39)

  • I tried every todo app and ended up with a .txt file
    One useful addition for text file users: on Windows, create hotkey\macro timestamps using something like Autohotkey (https://autohotkey.com/) 3 letter hotkeys seem to work well - long enough to be unique without overlapping real words. For instance, when I type ddd it automatically stamps this: 20250811 10:57 AM then I type my note and can look back at what time\date it was. Sometimes I just need the date so that... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • I made an alternative to convar helper so you can easily activate your favorite cheats and other vconsole commands, and it's versatile enough to use for other purposes too!
    All you have to do (other than have autohotkey installed) is. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Multiple dictionaries or alternatives.
    But, if you just install AutoHotKey, you can run these two scripts to select a first and a second dictionary: Select Dictionaries Zipfile. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Add prompt to text?
    You could try (and I have no affiliation with) http://autohotkey.com - then allocate the key to something like ctrl-F13 (often unused - but reachable via sending system keystroke). Source: over 2 years ago
  • Ctrl CapsLock Menu: The Best CapsLock Menu Script (Completely nonbiased statement)
    Autohotkey.com Go to the ahk website, click download, then choose 'Download v1.1 (deprecated)'. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing UI.Vision and AutoHotkey, you can also consider the following products

AutoIt - Other Articles You May Like AutoIt Script Editor AutoIt Downloads AutoIt Scripting Language

Sikuli - Sikuli Script

AutoKey - A Python 3 port of AutoKey, the desktop automation utility for Linux and X11.

Puloverโ€™s Macro Creator - Puloverโ€™s Macro Creator is a Free Automation Tool and Script Generator.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

FastKeys - Latest Version 4. 05. 28th December 2017 - Engine optimization, - Language translation updates, - General improvements and bug fixes. View Version History Your FEEDBACK is highly appreciated - send us an email or make a comment on FastKeys Forum.