Table of contents
Cross-Platform Compatibility
UI.Vision is compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux, allowing users to create and run automation scripts across different operating systems.
Browser Integration
The tool integrates directly with popular browsers like Chrome, Firefox, and Edge, making it easy to automate web-based tasks.
Open Source
UI.Vision offers an open-source version, making it accessible for developers to modify and extend its capabilities.
Visual Automation
Includes visual recognition features that allow users to create automation tasks based on images and screen elements, not just DOM elements.
Simplicity
Easy-to-use interface with a focus on visual scripting, making it accessible for beginners and non-developers.
Flexibility
Supports both Selenium IDE and its own command set, giving users flexibility in script creation.
Data-Driven Testing
Allows users to drive automated tests with data from CSV files, spreadsheets, or SQL databases.
Community Support
Being an open-source project, it has a community of users who contribute scripts, plugins, and bug fixes.
UI.Vision is generally considered a reliable and effective tool for automation tasks, particularly for those who need a versatile solution capable of handling both web-based and desktop environments. Its ease of use and extensive features make it a good option for many users, though those seeking more advanced features might want to explore other tools in conjunction with UI.Vision.
We have collected here some useful links to help you find out if UI.Vision is good.
Check the traffic stats of UI.Vision on SimilarWeb. The key metrics to look for are: monthly visits, average visit duration, pages per visit, and traffic by country. Moreoever, check the traffic sources. For example "Direct" traffic is a good sign.
Check the "Domain Rating" of UI.Vision on Ahrefs. The domain rating is a measure of the strength of a website's backlink profile on a scale from 0 to 100. It shows the strength of UI.Vision's backlink profile compared to the other websites. In most cases a domain rating of 60+ is considered good and 70+ is considered very good.
Check the "Domain Authority" of UI.Vision on MOZ. A website's domain authority (DA) is a search engine ranking score that predicts how well a website will rank on search engine result pages (SERPs). It is based on a 100-point logarithmic scale, with higher scores corresponding to a greater likelihood of ranking. This is another useful metric to check if a website is good.
The latest comments about UI.Vision on Reddit. This can help you find out how popualr the product is and what people think about it.
4) Mozilla; where a principal/staff engr cold DM'd me, to schedule a call with an HR rep that told me they're paying 350k base 420k total and another staff eng who's leaving to start a startup, only to then tell me I'm not senior enough but could maybe come on as a contractor, only to then tell me they're using internal resources for the contractors. Overall, I think the best opportunity in the space is going to... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
What distinguishes this from UI.Vision's (https://ui.vision/) session recorder? - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
Switch over to ui.vision. I find myself needing to automate, scrape and post legitimately in my 9-5, and it's been life changing. Source: about 3 years ago
You could go the script kiddie route and use ui.vision addons and just automate clicks, or go something more advanced and actually script it in python. Source: over 3 years ago
You might look at UiVision RPA. https://ui.vision/. Source: almost 4 years ago
Probably not the cleanest method but you could do some easy scraping using the "web scrapper" addon on Chrome and a basic macro with Macro recorder or UIvision. (both free and damn efficient). Source: over 4 years ago
I've used https://ui.vision/ to do this before. It was a bit daunting at first but it ended up saving me hours of boring work. Source: over 4 years ago
Using the UI.Vision RPA browser addon I've made an automatic script for the boring quizzes. Source: over 4 years ago
A sample in alphabetical order - and by no means exhaustive: https://apify.com/ https://axiom.ai/ (YC W21) https://include.ai/ https://www.progress.com/imacros https://trysmartcuts.com (YC W21) https://ui.vision/ https://wildfire.ai/ 3 of these are YC companies (reminds me of mixpanel vs segment vs amplitude, where YC are backing all the horses). Each company is different in its particular approach and market,... - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago
This link did not work for me, when I searched the internet, I found https://ui.vision/ - is this the same thing you were referencing? Source: almost 5 years ago
UI.Vision, a prominent open-source tool in the realm of automation and test scripting, receives mixed yet generally positive feedback from its users. Classified within product categories such as Windows Tools, Automation, Scripts, and Testing, UI.Vision competes with other established names like AutoHotkey, AutoIt, Sikuli, Selenium, and others, each offering distinct features in the niche of automation and user interface testing tools.
Predominantly praised for its versatility, UI.Vision is noted for spanning a wide range of automation needs, including test automation, web automation, screen scraping, UI testing, and desktop automation. Users highlight its capability to integrate seamlessly across various platforms, namely Linux, Windows, and macOS, which is facilitated through its browser extension compatibility with Firefox and Chrome. This emphasis on cross-platform functionality underscores its practicality for individuals and organizations relying on heterogeneous IT environments.
One of the standout features is the โImage Driven Automationโ which is recognized for helping automate workflows efficiently, both within browsers and desktop environments. This aspect appears to be particularly valuable for users who require reliable automation to handle repetitive tasks, as echoed by a user who found it life-changing for their daily job requirements in terms of automating, scraping, and posting tasks.
Public conversations around UI.Vision reflect a general appreciation for its simplicity and accessibility, particularly for non-programmers who can benefit from the straightforward automation of browser interactions, though some find the initial setup daunting. Comparisons made with other tools such as Python scripting exemplify a common dichotomy between ease-of-use and the depth of technical control.
Despite these positives, there are mentions of perceived limitations. Some users search for alternatives due to frustrations with โflaky automations,โ suggesting that while UI.Vision serves well for basic to intermediate tasks, more complex requirements might necessitate other solutions. This implies that while UI.Vision covers a broad spectrum of needs effectively, it might not be suited for intricate or highly-customized automation workflows that demand scripting at an advanced level.
As per public mentions, UI.Vision is often positioned as a practical choice for those seeking quick solutions for automating website tasks through browser extensions and macro recorders. However, some discussions hint at a competitive landscape where more sophisticated automation tools, potentially backed by tech accelerators like Y Combinator, offer strong alternatives.
In summary, UI.Vision's reputation is built on its ease of use, wide platform support, and effectiveness in automating routine tasks, making it an excellent choice for individuals and smaller-scale projects. Nevertheless, users with advanced needs might explore more robust solutions depending on their specific requirements. This dynamic ensures that UI.Vision, while widely appreciated, remains a part of a broader ecosystem of automation tools tailored to varying levels of complexity and technical demand.
Do you know an article comparing UI.Vision to other products?
Suggest a link to a post with product alternatives.
Is UI.Vision good? This is an informative page that will help you find out. Moreover, you can review and discuss UI.Vision here. The primary details have not been verified within the last quarter, and they might be outdated. If you think we are missing something, please use the means on this page to comment or suggest changes. All reviews and comments are highly encouranged and appreciated as they help everyone in the community to make an informed choice. Please always be kind and objective when evaluating a product and sharing your opinion.
