uBlacklist VS cppq

• Enhanced Search Experience
  uBlacklist allows users to filter unwanted websites from appearing in search engine results, creating a personalized and streamlined search experience.
• Customization
  Users can customize their blacklist to block specific sites, giving them control over which content they see and ensuring irrelevant or low-quality sites are excluded.
• Privacy Protection
  By blocking undesirable sites, uBlacklist potentially enhances privacy by reducing exposure to tracking scripts and cookies embedded in unwanted websites.
• Open Source
  Being an open-source project, users can verify the source code, ensuring transparency and the ability to modify the software if needed.
• Cross-Browser Compatibility
  The extension supports multiple browsers, making it accessible for a wide range of users and ensuring functionality regardless of the preferred browser.

Possible disadvantages

• Manual List Management
  Users need to manually add websites to their blacklist, which can be time-consuming and require ongoing maintenance to ensure effectiveness.
• Limited to User’s Input
  The effectiveness of the blacklist depends on the user’s knowledge and identification of unwanted sites; it may not automatically block new or unknown problematic sites.
• Search Engine Limitation
  Although uBlacklist supports popular search engines, its functionality is limited to them, potentially restricting its use in other search platforms or custom search engines.
• Initial Setup Effort
  There is a learning curve and initial effort required to set up and configure the blacklist tailored to an individual user’s needs.
• Potential Overblocking
  Users may inadvertently block useful or legitimate sites if not careful while managing their blacklist, which may hinder access to certain information.

• Lightweight C++ implementation
  cppq is written in modern C++ and designed to be a minimal, efficient task queue library, making it a good fit for performance-sensitive applications where the overhead of scripting language runtimes is undesirable.
• Redis-backed reliability
  Built on top of Redis as the message broker, cppq benefits from Redis's persistence, atomic operations, and wide adoption, giving the queue system durability and the ability to survive process restarts.
• Inspired by proven design (asynq)
  The library's architecture mirrors the popular Go asynq task queue, so it inherits a well-thought-out API design for task enqueueing, retries, and worker processing patterns that have already been validated in production systems.
• Native integration for C++ projects
  For teams already working in a C++ codebase, cppq allows adding background job processing without needing to introduce a separate service written in another language (like Go or Python), simplifying the technology stack.
• Open source and inspectable
  Being open source on GitHub, developers can review the source code, modify it for custom needs, and contribute improvements, which offers transparency not available with closed-source queueing solutions.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited maturity and battle-testing
  Compared to established task queue libraries like Sidekiq, Celery, or asynq itself, cppq is a newer and smaller project with less real-world production usage, which may translate into undiscovered bugs or edge cases.
• Smaller community and ecosystem
  Because it has far fewer users and contributors than mainstream task queue systems, finding community support, third-party tutorials, or pre-built integrations is more difficult.
• Documentation gaps
  As a smaller project, cppq may have less comprehensive documentation compared to major task queue frameworks, requiring developers to read source code directly to understand advanced features or edge-case behaviors.
• C++ build and dependency complexity
  Using cppq requires managing C++ build toolchains and dependencies (such as a Redis client library), which can be more cumbersome than installing a package via pip or npm in other ecosystems.
• Fewer built-in features and tooling
  cppq likely lacks the extensive ecosystem tooling of more mature queues, such as web-based monitoring dashboards, extensive metrics/observability integrations, or advanced scheduling features found in more established solutions.

No analysis of uBlacklist yet.

• How to enhance your Google searches

  Aside from that ubo answer, you can install https://iorate.github.io/ublacklist/ and click block. Also supports ddg, bing, and a few others. Source: about 4 years ago

• TikTok vs Google

  They literally end up back to back. You see the exact same title and the exact same "description" text. Without something like https://iorate.github.io/ublacklist I'd go insane. Source: about 4 years ago

• Filters to block and remove copycat-websites from DuckDuckGo, Google and other

  Another useful extension like this is https://iorate.github.io/ublacklist/. - Source: Hacker News / over 4 years ago

View more

Tracking cppq since Nov 2022.