
Algolia
Meilisearch
ElasticSearch
Pinecone
Apache Solr
OpenSearch
Milvus
Typo tolerant, delightfully simple, open source search 🔍

NovoPsych
Clinical assessment tools for psychologists, therapists and occupational therapists. Send measures by secure link and review scored results, severity bands and reports.

Which is more popular?
Based on our record, Typesense seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 61 times since March 2021.
Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | typesense.org | clientforms.app |
| Pricing | ||
| Listed in |
In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.


No description of Typesense yet.
Clinical assessment tools for psychologists, therapists and occupational therapists. Send measures such as the PHQ-9, GAD-7 and DASS-21 by secure link and get scored results, severity bands and reports ready to review. The catalogue also includes DSM-5 ADHD assessments and autism screening tools....
What each product offers, as listed by its team.


Possible disadvantages
An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.


Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Developers and teams looking for a lightweight, fast, and developer-friendly search engine for their web or mobile applications. Typesense is particularly suitable for projects that require real-time search, typo-tolerance, and a straightforward integration process.
Overall verdict
Why this product is good
Recommended for
Walkthroughs and reviews on video.
Getting started with Typesense
No ClientForms.app videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.


As answered by people managing Typesense and ClientForms.app.
ClientForms.app's answer:
Frontend: Next.js 15 (React 19), Tailwind CSS Backend: Supabase (PostgreSQL, Row-Level Security) Authentication: Clerk Payments: Stripe Hosting: Vercel (Sydney region) Database hosting: Supabase (Australian data residency)
ClientForms.app's answer:
Psychologists who assess ADHD and autism. Typically private practice, solo or small group (1-5 clinicians), currently using paper forms and spending hours on admin per assessment. They want something that works and is secure.
ClientForms.app's answer:
Neurodivergent-first design. Most digital forms just replicate paper online. ClientForms is built specifically for ADHD and autism patients - progress bars with time remaining (helps with time blindness), softer colours instead of harsh white, sticky headers so you always know where you are. The forms are designed to reduce anxiety and improve completion rates.
ClientForms.app's answer:
Most clinical software treats patients as an afterthought. ClientForms is designed specifically for neurodivergent users who are filling out the forms, progress indicators, time estimates, calmer colours, predictable layouts. One link, no signup required, works on any device. Patients just open and complete.
Share your experience with using Typesense and ClientForms.app. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.


A plug for yours truly! At Relevance AI, we’re building an Elasticsearch alternative that is very different to alternatives like Algolia and Typesense. Relevance AI search is an instant search API that understands...
Typesense is a fast, typo-tolerant search engine for building delightful search experiences. It claims that it is an Easier-to-Use ElasticSearch Alternative & an Open Source Algolia Alternative.
Oh hey! I'm one of the co-founders of Typesense. Delighted to stumble on a mention of Typesense on Indiehackers. Long time lurker, first time poster :)
We have no reviews of ClientForms.app yet. Be the first one to post
Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.


In another set of benchmarks we measured keyword-only search relevance of Typesense, Meilisearch, Elasticsearch, and Amgix, on a number of BEIR datasets. Here is the summary of the nDCG@10 results for the tested datasets:. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
Index them with Typesense (a FOSS, lightning-fast, local-first Algolia alternative). - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
For anyone who's interested, two other popular contenders for replacing Elasticsearch[1] are Typesense (https://typesense.org/) and Meilisearch (https://www.meilisearch.com/). [1] And also trying to replace Algolia, because both have... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Tracking ClientForms.app since Dec 2025.
When comparing Typesense and ClientForms.app, you can also consider the following products.

Algolia's Search API makes it easy to deliver a great search experience in your apps & websites. Algolia Search provides hosted full-text, numerical, faceted and geolocalized search.
Compare Algolia to Typesense or ClientForms.app:

NovoPsych is a tool that is used for outcome monitoring via conducting psychological tests online.
Compare NovoPsych to Typesense or ClientForms.app:

Ultra relevant, instant, and typo-tolerant full-text search API
Compare Meilisearch to Typesense or ClientForms.app:

Elasticsearch is an open source, distributed, RESTful search engine.
Compare ElasticSearch to Typesense or ClientForms.app:

Search through billions of items for similar matches to any object, in milliseconds. It’s the next generation of search, an API call away.
Compare Pinecone to Typesense or ClientForms.app:

Solr is an open source enterprise search server based on Lucene search library, with XML/HTTP and...
Compare Apache Solr to Typesense or ClientForms.app: