Two Factor Auth (2FA) VS Ember-cli

• Enhanced Security
  2FA provides an extra layer of security by requiring a second form of authentication, making it more difficult for unauthorized users to gain access to accounts.
• Protection Against Password Theft
  Even if a user's password is compromised, the second factor (like a code sent to a mobile device) helps prevent unauthorized access.
• Increased User Confidence
  Knowing that their accounts are protected by 2FA can give users more confidence in the security of the services they are using.

Possible disadvantages

• Usability Challenges
  Some users find the additional step of 2FA to be inconvenient or confusing, which can lead to frustration or decreased user satisfaction.
• Dependence on Devices
  2FA often requires access to a secondary device, like a smartphone, which can be problematic if the device is lost, stolen, or unavailable.
• Potential for Mishaps
  Issues such as delayed SMS messages or app malfunctions can prevent users from receiving their authentication codes, potentially locking them out of their accounts.

• Convention over Configuration
  Ember-cli enforces strong conventions for file structure, naming, and project organization, which reduces decision fatigue and makes it easier for developers to jump between different Ember projects with minimal onboarding time.
• Built-in Tooling
  Comes with a robust set of built-in tools including a development server, testing framework integration (QUnit), asset compilation, and live reload, reducing the need to manually configure and integrate third-party build tools.
• Addon Ecosystem
  Ember-cli supports a rich ecosystem of addons that can be easily installed and integrated into projects, allowing developers to extend functionality without reinventing the wheel for common features.
• Blueprints and Generators
  Provides powerful generator commands (blueprints) that scaffold components, routes, models, and other application pieces quickly, speeding up development and ensuring consistency across the codebase.
• Stable Long-term Support
  Ember-cli follows Ember's release cycle with clear LTS (Long Term Support) versions, providing stability and predictability for teams maintaining large applications over time.

Possible disadvantages

• Steep Learning Curve
  The strict conventions and unique architecture of Ember-cli can be difficult for newcomers to learn, especially those coming from more flexible frameworks or with no prior Ember experience.
• Smaller Community Compared to Alternatives
  Compared to tools like Vite, Webpack, or CRA used with React/Vue, Ember-cli has a smaller community and ecosystem, which can mean fewer third-party resources, tutorials, and community-driven troubleshooting.
• Build Performance
  For large applications, Ember-cli's build process can become slow, and while improvements have been made with embroider, some developers still report slower build times compared to more modern bundlers.
• Rigid Structure
  The opinionated nature of Ember-cli, while helpful for consistency, can feel restrictive for developers who prefer more flexibility in structuring their applications or adopting non-standard patterns.
• Migration Complexity
  Upgrading between major Ember-cli versions or migrating to newer build systems like Embroider can be complex and time-consuming, particularly for older or heavily customized applications.

No analysis of Two Factor Auth (2FA) yet.

Tracking Two Factor Auth (2FA) since Mar 2021.

• Help! Why does chrome console inner text and my program inner text not return the same values? (spent nearly the whole day trying to extract an element). Turned to reddit as its always had the best community. Any help is MASSIVELY appreciated. Puppeteer!!

  The webpage is LinkedIn.com. While this isn’t a framework, I know that are using https://cli.emberjs.com/release/. Source: about 5 years ago