Tools.do VS peadf

Tools.do's answer

We value privacy and fast delivery , it doesn't require to upload files to a server so its super fast to start processing and at the same time providing extreme privacy and security over your documents

peadf's answer:

Most online PDF editors upload your file to a server and then either drop a text box on top of the page or re-typeset it in a different font. peadf does neither. It edits the existing text of the PDF in your browser, keeping the original embedded font, size and colour, and re-wrapping the paragraph as you type, so an edited line looks like the lines around it. Redaction really removes the content from the file rather than covering it. And the sharing side is built around a link and QR code that never change: swap the PDF and every printed code and shared link keeps working. Your files never leave your device unless you choose to host one.

Tools.do's answer

No waiting time to upload, professional processing of files locally for most cases.

peadf's answer:

Three reasons. Privacy: editing, OCR, merging and the other tools run on your own device, so you can fix a contract, a CV or a tenancy agreement without uploading it anywhere. Fidelity: edits keep the original fonts, sizes and layout instead of leaving a visibly different patch on the page. Links that last: a peadf link and QR code point at whatever version of the file you upload next, so a menu, a brochure or a manual can be printed once and updated forever. It is also free to use with no watermark; you only pay to download an edited file or to host more PDFs.

Tools.do's answer

Office workers, Developers, Designers

peadf's answer:

Anyone who has a PDF and no access to the file it was made from: small business owners updating a menu or a price list, job seekers fixing a CV, landlords and freelancers editing contracts, teachers and office staff filling forms, and designers who want a printed QR code to keep working after the artwork changes. It also suits people who are not allowed to upload documents to third-party servers for privacy or compliance reasons, because the editing happens on their own device.

Tools.do's answer

Personally I needed quick tools without having to open big software programas such as adobe, and I wanted quick / fast process of my files. I really hated uploading times, thats why changed the standard focus to be able to reproduce fast results using local power while still providing remote processing for some tasks if needed.

peadf's answer:

peadf started from two everyday annoyances. The first was being handed a PDF with a typo in it and having no way to fix it short of buying Acrobat or uploading a private document to a stranger's server. The second was printing a QR code that pointed at a file which went out of date a week later. So we built a browser editor that changes the real text of a PDF while keeping its fonts and layout, and a hosting layer where one link and one QR code always point at the latest version of the file. It is built by a small, independent team in the UK that likes careful tools with no bloat and no dark patterns.

Tools.do's answer

We are using WASM, Webassembly, Vite, js. professional libraries, AI neural networks

peadf's answer:

The app is Next.js and React in TypeScript. PDF rendering and text extraction use Mozilla's pdf.js, writing and font embedding use pdf-lib, OCR runs on the device with Tesseract.js, and encryption and page rewriting use qpdf compiled to WebAssembly, so all the heavy work happens in the browser rather than on a server. Hosting, accounts and billing run on AWS, with Stripe for payments. The site is served in 20 languages.

Tools.do's answer

• Brugal & company
• Nestle