Software Alternatives & Startups

TinyProxy VS Apache Traffic Server

Compare TinyProxy VS Apache Traffic Server and see what are their differences

TinyProxy

A lightweight http(s) proxy daemon

Rating
5.0 · 1 review
Apache Traffic Server

Fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/S 2 and 1.1 compliant caching proxy server.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source

Which is more popular?

TinyProxy might be a bit more popular than Apache Traffic Server. We know about 8 links to it since March 2021 and only 6 links to Apache Traffic Server.

social mentions
8 vs 6
Proxy popularity
39% vs 61%
alternatives listed
102 vs 108

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

TP
TinyProxy
Apache Traffic Server
Website tinyproxy.github.io trafficserver.apache.org
Pricing —
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

TP
TinyProxy 5 features
Apache Traffic Server 5 features
  • Lightweight
    TinyProxy has a small footprint, making it highly efficient in terms of resource consumption.
  • Easy to Configure
    With a simple configuration file, TinyProxy is easy to set up and configure according to specific needs.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source solution, TinyProxy is free to use and can be modified to fit unique use cases.
  • Minimal Dependencies
    TinyProxy requires minimal dependencies, simplifying installation and maintenance on various systems.
  • HTTP Proxy Support
    It supports HTTP proxy functionality, making it suitable for basic web proxy needs.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Features
    TinyProxy offers basic functionality and lacks more advanced features found in other proxy solutions.
  • Security Limitations
    Due to its minimalistic nature, TinyProxy has limited security features such as traffic encryption.
  • No Web UI
    TinyProxy does not come with a web-based user interface, making management less intuitive for some users.
  • Not Ideal for Large Scale
    Its lightweight design means it may not scale well for large enterprise environments compared to more robust proxy solutions.
  • Lack of Comprehensive Documentation
    The documentation can be sparse, making troubleshooting and advanced configuration challenging for new users.
  • High Performance
    Apache Traffic Server is designed for high-speed caching and can handle large volumes of traffic efficiently. Its architecture allows it to serve requests with low latency, making it suitable for high-traffic websites and applications.
  • Scalability
    It offers robust scalability features, allowing it to manage multiple terabytes of data and scale up to handle many clients simultaneously, which is beneficial for growing businesses and expanding infrastructure.
  • Extensibility
    Traffic Server supports plugins and extensions, enabling developers to customize and extend its functionality to suit specific needs, which adds flexibility for unique requirements.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Apache Traffic Server offers a free solution with a strong community support, allowing users to collaborate and contribute to its development and troubleshoot issues.
  • SSL Termination
    It provides the capability to handle SSL termination, which offloads the burden from backend servers, improving overall security and performance for HTTPS traffic.

Possible disadvantages

  • Complex Configuration
    The configuration of Apache Traffic Server can be complex, especially for beginners, which might require a steep learning curve and extensive documentation reading or seeking community help.
  • Limited Windows Support
    Traffic Server is primarily developed for Unix-based systems and has limited support for Windows, which can be a limitation for organizations that primarily operate in a Windows environment.
  • Community Support
    While it benefits from open-source community support, it may not have the same level of professional support or comprehensive documentation as some commercial alternatives, potentially leading to slower resolution of issues.
  • Resource Intensive
    When handling large amounts of traffic, Apache Traffic Server can become resource-intensive, which may necessitate higher hardware investments to maintain optimal performance.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

TP
TinyProxy 1 video + Add
Apache Traffic Server 2 videos + Add

kodi recording nbc with ffmpeg without tinyproxy - kodi recording videos - 20

Transparent HTTP proxying with Apache Traffic Server

More videos

  • - Yahoo's Adventure with Apache Traffic Server - Shu Kit Chan, Vijay Prashanth Hosahithlu

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
TP
TinyProxy
Apache Traffic Server
39% 39%
61% 61%
20% 20%
80% 80%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using TinyProxy and Apache Traffic Server. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

TP
TinyProxy 5.0 · 1 review
Apache Traffic Server no reviews yet
  • It was easier to install and use than expected
    SaaSHub review
    · Feb 2020

    Super simple and straight to the point. All I had to do, in a linux server, was this: install it => apt install tinyproxy configure hosts allowed to connect reload configs => service tinyproxy reload

We have no reviews of Apache Traffic Server yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

TP
TinyProxy 8 mentions
Apache Traffic Server 6 mentions
  • Duct tape enough services together and you can cache APT packages
    The first result led me to TinyProxywhich was the exactly what I needed. It’s a small, proxy server that handles forwarding HTTPS requests, requiring almost zero configuration, and has on-going maintenance. Adding it to the container and... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Overcoming Geo-Blocked Feature Testing with Zero-Budget DevOps Strategies
    Leverage open-source proxy tools like mitmproxy or tinyproxy, which allow you to intercept and modify HTTP requests and responses in real-time. By configuring these, you can simulate different geo conditions:. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • I Add 3-25 Seconds of Latency to Every Page I Visit (2020)
    Probably by modifying the source code of https://tinyproxy.github.io (it's a lightweight proxy, but modifying the source would be not a 5-minute thing...). - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

View more

  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Apache Traffic Server — A free, fast, and scalable HTTP caching system that improves network efficiency. It supports forward and reverse proxy caching and is configurable to run simultaneously on either or both options. It also provides... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Wikipedia now has up to 1000X reduction of ATS disk read latency at the p999
    Apache Traffic Server: https://trafficserver.apache.org/ Here’s how they use it along with Varnish: https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/Caching_overview. - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
  • How does Content delivery/distribution network work?
    The LARGE majority of CDNs use either Apache Traffic Server (https://trafficserver.apache.org/) or Nginx for their cache webserver, so the mechanisms used are pretty easy to find if you look through the docs. Source: over 4 years ago

View more

Alternatives to TinyProxy and Apache Traffic Server

When comparing TinyProxy and Apache Traffic Server, you can also consider the following products.