Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
MIT

Tiny C Compiler VS MIT Scheme

Compare Tiny C Compiler VS MIT Scheme and see what are their differences

Modelence
Create production-ready applications with zero code sponsored
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Tiny C Compiler logo Tiny C Compiler

The Tiny C Compiler is an x86, x86-64 and ARM processor C compiler created by Fabrice Bellard.

MIT Scheme logo MIT Scheme

Implementation of Scheme providing an interpreter, compiler, source-code debugger, integrated Emacs-like editor, and a large run-time library
  • Tiny C Compiler Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-11-06
  • MIT Scheme Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-16

Tiny C Compiler features and specs

  • Fast Compilation
    Tiny C Compiler (TCC) is known for its incredibly fast compilation speed, which makes it ideal for quick compilations and testing.
  • Small Size
    TCC has a very small footprint compared to other compilers, making it easy to include in applications and use in environments with limited resources.
  • C99 Support
    TCC provides support for the C99 standard, allowing the use of newer C language features.
  • Dynamic Code Generation
    TCC can compile and execute code dynamically, which can be useful for scripting or embedded contexts.
  • Simplified Licensing
    Under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), TCC can be more easily used in various projects, including proprietary ones, compared to compilers with more restrictive licenses.

Possible disadvantages of Tiny C Compiler

  • Limited Optimization
    TCC does not perform extensive optimization, which can result in less efficient executable code compared to compilers like GCC or Clang.
  • Incomplete C Standard Library
    TCC's standard C library implementation is not as complete as those of more established compilers, which might lead to compatibility issues.
  • Lack of Detailed Documentation
    Users may find the available documentation lacking in detail, which can hinder learning and debugging for complex projects.
  • Limited Platform Support
    TCC is primarily designed for smaller-scale applications and lacks some platform-specific and cross-compilation capabilities.
  • Fewer Community Resources
    Compared to major compilers like GCC or Clang, TCC has a smaller user community, which can mean fewer tutorials, forums, and third-party support tools.

MIT Scheme features and specs

  • Advanced Features
    MIT Scheme offers advanced language features such as first-class continuations, rich macro facilities, and an extensive runtime library, making it a powerful tool for education and research.
  • Educational Use
    Being designed for educational use, MIT Scheme is well-suited for teaching purposes, especially in introductory computer science courses focusing on functional programming and Scheme itself.
  • GNU License
    Being distributed under the GNU General Public License, MIT Scheme is free software, allowing users to study, modify, and distribute the software with few restrictions.
  • Cross-Platform
    MIT Scheme runs on a variety of platforms, including Unix-like systems and Windows, providing flexibility in choosing an operating system.

Possible disadvantages of MIT Scheme

  • Limited Community
    Compared to more popular languages and Scheme implementations, MIT Scheme has a relatively small user community, which might result in fewer tutorials, examples, and community support.
  • Performance
    While suitable for educational purposes, MIT Scheme might not offer the same level of performance optimization available in other languages or more modern Scheme implementations.
  • Lack of Modern Features
    MIT Scheme may lack some features or conveniences found in newer programming languages or environments, such as extensive IDE support and modern libraries.
  • Complexity
    The advanced features offered may also introduce complexity, making it potentially challenging for beginners not focused on Scheme-specific or functional programming paradigms.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Tiny C Compiler and MIT Scheme)

Tiny C Compiler

MIT Scheme

IDE
71 71%
IDE
29% 29
Programming Language
0 0%
Programming Language
100% 100
Text Editors
64 64%
Text Editors
36% 36
Email Marketing
100 100%
Email Marketing
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Tiny C Compiler and MIT Scheme. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Tiny C Compiler seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 37 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Tiny C Compiler mentions (37)

  • What every compiler writer should know about programmers (Anton Ertl, 2015) [pdf]
    Some of those already exist, e.g. https://bellard.org/tcc/ However, they're not in widespread use. I would be curious to learn if there's any data/non-anecdotal information as to why. Is it momentum/inertia of GCC/LLVM/MSVC? Are alternative compilers incomplete and can't actually compile a lot of practical programs (belying the "relatively simple program") claim? Or is the performance differential due to... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Git: Introduce Rust and announce that it will become mandatorty
    In theory you should be able to use TCC to build git currently [1] [2]. If you have a lightweight system or you're building something experimental, it's a lot easier to get TCC up and running over GCC. I note that it supports arm, arm64, i386, riscv64 and x86_64. [1] https://bellard.org/tcc/ [2] https://github.com/TinyCC/tinycc. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • Weird Lexical Syntax
    > I'm not sure who wants to be able to syntax highlight C at 35 MB per second, but I am now able to do so Fast, but tcc *compiles* C to binary code at 29 MB/s on a really old computer: https://bellard.org/tcc/#speed. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Pnut: A C to POSIX Shell Compiler you can Trust
    "Because Pnut can be distributed as a human-readable shell script (`pnut.sh`), it can serve as the basis for a reproducible build system. With a POSIX compliant shell, `pnut.sh` is sufficiently powerful to compile itself and, with some effort, [TCC](https://bellard.org/tcc/). Because TCC can be used to bootstrap GCC, this makes it possible to bootstrap a fully featured build toolchain from only human-readable... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Cwerg: C-like language that can be implemented in 10kLOC
    For what it's worth you can implement a C compiler in under 10kLOC. The chibi C compiler is only a few thousand lines [1]. There is also Cake [2] and the tiny C compiler [3] which are both relatively small. [1] https://github.com/rui314/chibicc [3] https://bellard.org/tcc/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
View more

MIT Scheme mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of MIT Scheme yet. Tracking of MIT Scheme recommendations started around Feb 2022.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Tiny C Compiler and MIT Scheme, you can also consider the following products

GNU Compiler Collection - The GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) is a compiler system produced by the GNU Project supporting...

Hy - Hy is a wonderful dialect of Lisp that’s embedded in Python.

LLVM - LLVM is a compiler infrastructure designed for compile-time, link-time, run-time, and...

Steel Bank Common Lisp - Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.

clang - C, C++, Objective C and Objective C++ front-end for the LLVM compiler.

CMU Common Lisp - CMUCL is a high-performance, free Common Lisp implementation.

Loading...