Software Alternatives & Startups

Timing VS EJS

Compare Timing VS EJS and see what are their differences

Timing

Timing is the best way to keep track of the time you spend with your Mac.

Rating
0 reviews
EJS

An open source JavaScript Template library.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Which is more popular?

EJS might be a bit more popular than Timing. We know about 26 links to it since March 2021 and only 23 links to Timing.

social mentions
23 vs 26
Time Tracking popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
240+ vs 157

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Timing
EJS
EJS
Website timingapp.com ejs.co
Pricing —
Open source
Listed in

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Timing 5 features
EJS
EJS 6 features
  • Comprehensive Time Tracking
    Timing automatically tracks how you spend time on your Mac, providing detailed insights into your productivity and time management.
  • Automatic Categorization
    The app intelligently categorizes activities, reducing the need for manual input, and making it easier to understand where your time goes.
  • Detailed Reports
    Timing offers robust reporting features, allowing users to generate detailed reports that can be customized to show specific time usage and productivity metrics.
  • Privacy Focused
    Timing ensures that all data is kept private and stored locally on your device, addressing concerns about data privacy and security.
  • Integrations
    The app offers integrations with popular productivity tools such as calendar applications and task managers, streamlining workflow management.

Possible disadvantages

  • Mac-Only
    Timing is only available for macOS, limiting its use to users within the Apple ecosystem and excluding Windows and Linux users.
  • Subscription Model
    The app operates on a subscription basis, which may be less appealing to users who prefer one-time purchases over recurring costs.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might find the comprehensive features and settings overwhelming initially, requiring time to fully understand and utilize all functionalities.
  • No Mobile App
    There is no mobile app available, limiting time tracking capabilities to desktop use only and missing out on mobile-centric workflows.
  • Price
    Timing is relatively expensive compared to some other time tracking solutions, which may be a consideration for budget-conscious individuals or small businesses.
  • Simplicity
    EJS is easy to learn and use, especially for developers who are already familiar with JavaScript. The syntax is straightforward, making it a good choice for quick application development.
  • JavaScript Integration
    Since EJS templates are JavaScript files, you can seamlessly integrate JavaScript code, making it easy to manipulate data and use familiar JavaScript functions.
  • Lightweight
    EJS is a lightweight template engine, which makes it an optimal choice for applications where performance and simplicity are critical.
  • Flexibility
    Allows for the embedding of plain JavaScript within the templates, giving developers the flexibility to add logic directly in their HTML.
  • Partial Templates
    Supports partials, which help to reuse code snippets across different views, promoting DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principles.
  • Server-Side Rendering
    Supports server-side rendering, which can improve performance by reducing the amount of client-side processing needed.

Possible disadvantages

  • Limited Functionality
    Compared to more feature-rich template engines like Handlebars or Pug, EJS offers limited functionalities which might be a drawback for large, complex projects.
  • Debugging
    Debugging EJS templates can sometimes be challenging. Errors within templates can often be vague, making it difficult to trace the root cause.
  • Maintenance
    Embedding a lot of JavaScript within templates can make the code harder to read and maintain, especially as the complexity of the application grows.
  • Performance Overhead
    For very large and complex templates, EJS can introduce a performance overhead compared to more optimized template engines designed for high performance.
  • Community and Support
    While EJS has a reasonable user base, the community and support may not be as extensive as more popular alternatives like React or Vue.js.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Timing
EJS
EJS

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Timing is a highly regarded productivity app, especially for macOS users.

Why this product is good

  • Timing is praised for its automatic time tracking capabilities, allowing users to understand how they spend their time without the manual start-stop process. It offers insightful reports and analytics, which can help users improve their productivity and time management. The app's ability to categorize activities automatically and the provision of manual adjustments offer flexibility and precision in tracking time.

Recommended for

  • Freelancers who need detailed tracking for client billing.
  • Professionals seeking to optimize their productivity.
  • Anyone interested in understanding their digital habits.
  • macOS users, as the app is primarily designed for this platform.

Overall verdict

  • Yes, EJS is considered good, particularly for projects where developers want ease of use and flexibility with JavaScript templating. It is lightweight, easy to learn, and integrates well with Express, a popular Node.js web application framework.

Why this product is good

  • EJS (Embedded JavaScript Templating) is popular because it provides a simple way to generate HTML markup with plain JavaScript. It allows for the embedding of JavaScript logic within your HTML templates, making it straightforward to use for those familiar with JavaScript. It's known for its efficiency in rendering templates and ease of integration with Node.js applications.

Recommended for

    EJS is recommended for developers building server-side web applications using Node.js and those looking for a simple, yet effective, templating solution. It is particularly suitable for small to medium-sized projects where dynamic content generation is needed and for teams that prioritize simplicity and performance.

Videos

Walkthroughs and reviews on video.

Timing 3 videos + Add
EJS
EJS 2 videos + Add

Review of Nature and Timing of the Resurrection Debate Part 3

More videos

  • - Timing 2.0 review | features, pricing and thoughts
  • - Nav & Metro Boomin - PERFECT TIMING MIXTAPE Review

Kane Creek - Bestop Trail Review at EJS 2019

More videos

  • - JavaScript Templating Tutorial | Introduction To EJS

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Timing
EJS
EJS
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%
100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 0%
100% 100%

User comments

Share your experience with using Timing and EJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Timing 23 mentions
EJS
EJS 26 mentions
  • Launch HN: PointOne (YC W24) – Automated time tracking for lawyers
    Timing.app is really good for this purpose. I use it every day, but I am not affiliated with the company in any way. Essentially it uses the accessibility features on MacOS to see what you are doing and generate time entries for you.... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • A collection of useful Mac Apps
    Timing - Price: $42/year or $7/month Automatic time tracking app for Mac that helps you track and analyze your time spent on different tasks and projects. Source: over 3 years ago
  • A Windows based alternative to the Timing App on Mac?
    I've been religiously utilising Timing for at least a year now. However I'm trying to find the closest Windows equivalent now that I'm using Windows on a semi-frequent basis. The features I most benefit from are its:. Source: over 3 years ago

View more

  • Next.js vs Express: What to Choose in 2025?
    Express does not provide SEO benefits by default and would require additional configuration with tools like EJS (Embedded JavaScript) or Handlebars for server-side rendering. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Chapter 7: HTML part two
    For a more robust approach, we'd probably need to install a templating language of some kind, such as Twig, EJS, Handlebars, Pug or Mustache (this is not a complete list!). Reading the documentation for posthtml-modules, you'll notice it... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Web Components and SSR - 2024 Edition
    Server-side Framework SSR is when you use a framework that runs the HTML templating logic entirely on the server to compose the HTML that will be rendered in the browser. These are frameworks like Ruby on Rails, ASP.Net, PHP, or even... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Timing and EJS

When comparing Timing and EJS, you can also consider the following products.