Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Things VS CodeceptJS

Compare Things VS CodeceptJS and see what are their differences

BusinessXray
Automated 60-second forensic business auditing pipeline powered by OpenAI Nano AI. Built for consultants and analysts. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. ยป Base Details
  2. ยป Videos
  3. ยป Reviews
  4. ยป Alternatives

Things logo Things

Things is an easy to use task manager.

CodeceptJS logo CodeceptJS

SuperCharged End 2 End Testing with WebDriver & Puppeteer
  • Things Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-17
  • CodeceptJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27

Things features and specs

  • User Experience
    Things is known for its clean, intuitive, and beautifully designed user interface, making it easy to use.
  • Integration with Apple Ecosystem
    Seamlessly integrates with macOS and iOS devices, offering features like Handoff and deep Apple Calendar integration.
  • Powerful Task Management
    Supports projects, areas, headings, and tags, providing a robust system for managing complex tasks and workflows.
  • Quick Entry
    Provides a quick entry function allowing users to capture tasks efficiently, which can later be categorized and detailed.
  • Updates and Support
    Regularly updated with new features and enhancements, backed by reliable customer support.
  • Keyboard Shortcuts
    Offers extensive keyboard shortcuts for power users to navigate and manage tasks quickly.
  • Natural Language Processing
    Allows users to input tasks using natural language, which is then intelligently parsed and scheduled.

Possible disadvantages of Things

  • Cost
    Things requires a one-time purchase for each platform (macOS, iOS), making it relatively expensive compared to some subscription-based competitors.
  • Platform Limitation
    Only available on Apple devices (macOS and iOS), making it inaccessible for users on Windows, Android, or other platforms.
  • No Collaboration Features
    Lacks built-in collaboration tools, which can be a drawback for teams looking to share and manage tasks collectively.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic interface is user-friendly, fully utilizing advanced features can require time and a deeper understanding.
  • Limited Automation
    Offers fewer automation options and integrations compared to some competitors like Todoist or Microsoft To Do.

CodeceptJS features and specs

  • Unified Testing Framework
    CodeceptJS uses the BDD-style syntax to write tests, which makes it easier to read and write. It supports multiple backend drivers such as WebDriver, Protractor, Puppeteer, and Playwright, allowing flexibility in test automation.
  • Interactive Debugging
    It offers an interactive debugging mode, where you can pause tests and interact with the application in a browser, making it easier to diagnose and fix issues.
  • Scenario-based Testing
    Provides a scenario-based testing approach that is easy to understand and helps create more structured and organized test cases.
  • Rich Plugin Ecosystem
    CodeceptJS has a variety of plugins available that can extend its capabilities, such as allure reports, UI-based test execution, and advanced interface configurations.
  • Automatic Waiting
    With its built-in automatic waiting system, testers don't need to write explicit waits or sleeps, reducing flakiness in test scripts.

Possible disadvantages of CodeceptJS

  • Learning Curve
    While CodeceptJS simplifies many aspects of testing, it requires initial learning and adaptation for those not familiar with its scenario-driven testing approach or JavaScript.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Setting up CodeceptJS with the different supported drivers can be complex, especially for beginners or those who are not familiar with JavaScript-based test automation.
  • Community and Support
    Although gaining popularity, the community size is relatively smaller compared to some other testing frameworks, which may lead to limited resources or solutions when facing complex issues.
  • Performance Overhead
    The abstraction layers that CodeceptJS provides, while useful, can sometimes lead to performance overhead compared to writing raw scripts with lower-level libraries directly.

Analysis of Things

Overall verdict

  • Things is widely regarded as an excellent productivity tool, especially for Apple ecosystem users. It combines elegance with functionality, making it a top choice for those who prefer a minimalist but powerful task manager.

Why this product is good

  • Things by Cultured Code is highly acclaimed for its clean, intuitive design and effective task management features. It provides a seamless user experience with its natural language input, powerful integration with macOS and iOS, and features like projects, areas, deadlines, and reminders that help users organize their tasks efficiently. The app is particularly praised for its focus on simplicity and ease of use, which allows users to focus on their tasks without being overwhelmed by features.

Recommended for

    Things is ideal for individuals who are deeply integrated into the Apple ecosystem and appreciate a minimalist design approach. It's perfect for users who prefer a straightforward, no-frills task management system that emphasizes ease of use, efficiency, and aesthetic appeal.

Things videos

+ Add

Brandon's Cult Movie Reviews: THINGS

More videos:

  • Review - Things 3: Full Review (2019)
  • Review - OmniFocus vs. Things 3 review: which is best for you?

CodeceptJS videos

+ Add

Testing with NightwatchJS, Introduction to CodeceptJS, CodeceptJS + Playright and Cypress journey

More videos:

  • Review - Video #10 For a better tests Management with CodeceptJS & Docker
  • Review - CodeceptUI - bringing Cypress like experience to CodeceptJS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Things and CodeceptJS)

Things

CodeceptJS

Task Management
100 100%
Task Management
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
Automated Testing
100% 100
Project Management
100 100%
Project Management
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
Browser Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Things and CodeceptJS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Things and CodeceptJS

Things Reviews

11 Ayanza Alternatives
Things 3 is a multi-award-winning personal task manager that assists you in keeping track of your tasks. The environment of the application is attractive with a fresh new look, delightful integrations, and powerful features. It has been completely effective to boost efficiency with easy to use and is attractive to the eye. The themes are a creative and powerful feature that...
Source: www.justalternativeto.com
Five of the Best To-Do Apps for iOS
Things 3 is one of the few to-do apps that's not subscription based, and it costs $9.99 to purchase. Things 3 is also available for Mac and iPad, though each app must be purchased individually.
Source: www.macrumors.com

CodeceptJS Reviews

We have no reviews of CodeceptJS yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Things should be more popular than CodeceptJS. It has been mentiond 58 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Things mentions (58)

  • We don't need startups, we need Digital-Mittelstand
    Correct: https://culturedcode.com/things/ Looks like the different apps (desktop, mobile, iPad) have different prices, but all are one-time payments of $10-$50. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Essential Software for Mac Users: Three Recommended Efficient Tools
    Things 3is an award-winning task management application known for its clean, elegant interface and intuitive usability. It employs a minimalist design style, allowing users to easily add, organize, and view tasks, helping individuals efficiently manage daily affairs. While Things 3 does not support team collaboration features, it provides a smooth user experience on macOS as a personal task management tool. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Show HN: I built a task manager that separates "Do" & "Due" dates
    How badly do Twos want to SEO rank on searches for Things? https://culturedcode.com/things/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: What macOS apps/programs do you use daily and recommend?
    Alfred - Productivity App for macOS [1] iTerm2 - macOS Terminal Replacement [2] Dropshare App - upload anything anywhere on macOS [3] Mimestream - A native macOS email client for Gmail [4] Things - To-Do List for Mac & iOS [5] [1] https://www.alfredapp.com [2] https://iterm2.com [3] https://dropshare.app [4] https://mimestream.com [5] https://culturedcode.com/things. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Ready to advance from Evernote, looking at Obsidian
    Currently, I use Things (https://culturedcode.com/things/) for tasks and Evernote for notes, and experimented with Freeform (I love the visual aspect and simplicity). At work, I've used Notion, Mural, Miro, LucidChart, Quip, and many other collaboration-based knowledge systems. I never researched the best of personal knowledge systems until now. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

CodeceptJS mentions (10)

  • Automation Framework Design
    But honestly, it may be preferable for you to use a single framework that does support both technologies (Web and Mobile) out of the box like webdriver.io or codecept. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Comparing Full Page Screenshots, Cross-Device
    There are different tools for visual screenshot testing, like BackstopJS, and Cypress.io also has a screenshot() function. In this series, I focus on writing tests with CodeceptJS. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • How to Accelerate Selenide Tests with Playwright
    CodeceptJS โ€“ A wrapper for different tools in one interface. Language: JavaScript/TypeScript. Frameworks that are wrapped: Playwright, Webdriver.io, Puppeteer, Protractor, etc. The service also comes with a large community and is easy to install and use for e2e testing. - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Cypress vs WebDriverIO vs Selenium, and more โ€” The ULTIMATE comparison among testing frameworks
    I'm saddened codeceptJS wasn't even mentioned. It's easily better than most of the ones listed except Cypress. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Testing React Apps in 2022 with Cypress: An In-Depth Guide for Beginners
    Back when I was doing FE, I found https://codecept.io, which is the same concept as Cypress but with a Playwright driver. Have not used but thought it's worth a mention. - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Things and CodeceptJS, you can also consider the following products

Todoist - Todoist is a to-do list that helps you get organized, at work and in life.

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.

TickTick - TickTickis a cross-platform to-do list app & task manager helps you to get all things done and make life well organized.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Remember The Milk - Remember The Milk is a task and time management application for mobile devices.

Playwright - Playwright is automation software for Chromium, Firefox, Webkit using the Node.js library having a single API in place.

Loading...