thinBasic VS LiveCode Platform

• Simplicity
  thinBasic offers a straightforward syntax that is easy to learn for beginners, making it an accessible choice for those new to programming.
• Rapid Development
  Due to its simplicity and focus on procedural programming, thinBasic allows for quick prototyping and development of small to medium-sized programs.
• Rich Feature Set
  Despite its simplicity, thinBasic provides a wide range of features and modules, including support for graphics, sound, file manipulation, and more.
• Community Support
  thinBasic has an active user community and forums, where users can share scripts, discuss problems, and get support for their projects.

Possible disadvantages

• Limited Object-Oriented Support
  thinBasic is primarily a procedural language and offers limited support for object-oriented programming, which may not meet the needs of developers accustomed to modern OOP languages.
• Platform Dependency
  thinBasic is primarily designed for Windows, which can be a restriction for developers seeking cross-platform compatibility.
• Performance Constraints
  As an interpreted language, thinBasic might not be suitable for applications that require high performance or computational efficiency.
• Niche Use Case
  The language is somewhat niche and not as widely adopted in the industry, which could result in a limited job market and fewer resources compared to more popular programming languages.

• Cross-Platform Deployment
  LiveCode allows developers to deploy applications across multiple platforms such as Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android, using a single code base. This reduces the time and effort needed to develop separate applications for each platform.
• Easy-to-Understand Syntax
  LiveCode uses an English-like syntax which makes it accessible and easy to learn for beginners or those with limited programming experience. This can result in a faster learning curve and quicker application development.
• Rapid Prototyping
  The platform is designed for fast application development, allowing developers to quickly create prototypes and refine applications rapidly based on user feedback.
• Active Community and Resources
  LiveCode has a supportive community with ample resources such as forums, documentation, and guides which can help developers solve problems and learn best practices.

Possible disadvantages

• Performance Limitations
  Although suitable for many applications, LiveCode might not offer the best performance for resource-intensive tasks or applications compared to native development languages.
• Limited Third-Party Integration
  While LiveCode provides built-in functionality for many tasks, it might have limitations when integrating with certain third-party libraries or specialized functionalities available in other languages.
• Subscription Costs
  LiveCode offers a free version, but advanced features require a subscription, which might be a limiting factor for developers or small businesses with tight budgets.
• Less Popularity
  Compared to more popular development environments, LiveCode has a smaller user base, which might lead to fewer job opportunities and a smaller community of fellow developers.

Tracking thinBasic since Mar 2021.

• Show HN: Breadboard – a modern HyperCard for building web apps on the canvas

  Looks like a less feature-full version of livecode [0], which I'd argue is more of a HyperCard successor", since they were formerly revolution & MetaCard, and can import HyperCard stacks. [0] https://livecode.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago

• The Tulip Creative Computer

  Funny how this has co-opted the Runtime Revolution folks re-naming their Hypercard clone as: https://livecode.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

• Bill Atkinson has passed away

  His legacy still exists and continues today. Even updated to modern sensibilities, as well as cross-platform, and compatible with all your legacy Hypercard stacks! As far as I remember, progression was Hypercard -> Metacard -> Runtime... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

View more