Software Alternatives & Startups
Register | Login

Testinel.dev VS Proxyman.io

Compare Testinel.dev VS Proxyman.io and see what are their differences

Testinel.dev

Analyze Selenium and Playwright test runs, logs, and recurring failures so your team can find root causes and ship stable software faster.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source Freemium Free trial $29 / Monthly (Unlim. users, unlim. projects, 10K test runs)
Alternatives Is it good?
Proxyman.io

Proxyman is a high-performance macOS app, which enables developers to view HTTP/HTTPS requests from apps and domains.

Rating
0 reviews
Pricing
Open source $49 / Annually
Alternatives Is it good?
Tempreon
A personal memory layer for your AI tools, connected over MCP. sponsored

Which is more popular?

Based on our record, Proxyman.io seems to be more popular. It has been mentioned 27 times since March 2021.

social mentions
0 vs 27
Error Tracking popularity
100% vs 0%
alternatives listed
8 vs 240+

Base details

Website, pricing, platforms and company facts side by side.

Testinel.dev
Proxyman.io
Website testinel.dev proxyman.com
Pricing
Open source Freemium Free trial $29 / Monthly (Unlim. users, unlim. projects, 10K test runs) Official pricing
Open source $49 / Annually Official pricing
Platforms —
Mac OSX
Listed in
Website Testing Visual Bug Reports Automated Testing Browser Testing Software Testing Developer Tools Error Tracking Bug Reporting Testing +6
Developer Tools Debugging Proxy HTTP Proxies +1

About Testinel.dev and Proxyman.io

In their own words, as submitted to SaaSHub.

Testinel.dev
Proxyman.io

No description of Testinel.dev yet.

Modern and Delightful HTTP Debugging Proxy Proxyman is a native, high-performance macOS application, which enables developers to observe and manipulate HTTP/HTTPS requests.

Read more about Proxyman.io

Features and specs

What each product offers, as listed by its team.

Testinel.dev 5 features
Proxyman.io 7 features
  • AI-Powered Test Generation
    Testinel.dev leverages AI to automatically generate test cases, which can significantly speed up the QA process and reduce manual effort in writing repetitive test scripts.
  • Streamlined QA Workflow
    The platform appears designed to integrate testing directly into development workflows, helping teams catch bugs earlier and maintain software quality with less overhead.
  • Reduced Manual Testing Effort
    By automating test creation and execution, teams can reduce the time spent on manual regression testing, freeing up QA engineers to focus on more complex edge cases.
  • Scalability for Growing Teams
    As an automated testing tool, it can scale test coverage more easily than manual processes as an application grows in complexity and size.
  • Faster Feedback Loops
    Automated testing tools like Testinel.dev typically provide quicker feedback to developers about code changes, supporting faster iteration and continuous integration practices.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Proxyman.io provides an intuitive and easy-to-navigate user interface, making it accessible for both beginners and advanced users.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    It supports multiple platforms including macOS, Windows, and Linux, ensuring a broad range of users can utilize the tool.
  • Real-time Traffic Interception
    Proxyman.io offers real-time traffic interception and inspection, enabling users to debug and analyze traffic as it happens.
  • HTTPS Decryption
    The tool supports HTTPS decryption, allowing users to view encrypted traffic for more thorough analysis.
  • Customizable Filters
    Users can set up customizable filters to focus on specific types of traffic or protocols, enhancing productivity and efficiency.
  • Extensive Documentation
    Proxyman.io provides detailed documentation and tutorials, helping users to make the most of the software.
  • Active Community and Support
    The tool has an active community and responsive support team, providing assistance and updates regularly.

Possible disadvantages

  • Cost
    While Proxyman.io offers a free trial, the full version is paid, which might be a barrier for some users or smaller organizations.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, new users might still experience a learning curve to fully utilize all features.
  • Resource Intensive
    The application can be resource-intensive, potentially slowing down the system when intercepting high volumes of traffic.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version has limitations in terms of features and volume of traffic it can handle, which may necessitate purchasing the paid version for extensive use.
  • Occasional Bugs
    Like any software, it can have occasional bugs or performance issues, although these are generally addressed quickly by the development team.

Analysis

An editorial look at what each product does well and who it suits.

Testinel.dev
Proxyman.io

No analysis of Testinel.dev yet.

Overall verdict

  • Proxyman.io is generally considered a good tool for developers in need of a robust and intuitive proxy tool. It provides essential features for network traffic analysis with a clean and modern interface.

Why this product is good

  • Proxyman.io is appreciated for its user-friendly interface and powerful features that make it an effective tool for web debugging. It supports a range of protocols including HTTP, HTTPS, and WebSocket, and offers functionalities such as breakpoints, request/response modification, and SSL proxying. Its integration with MacOS makes it a preferred choice for developers in that ecosystem.

Recommended for

  • Web developers
  • Mobile developers
  • Security researchers
  • Quality assurance engineers

Category popularity

How often each product is chosen within a category, 0–100% relative to the other.

Score bands 0–20 21–40 41–50 51–60 61–100
Testinel.dev
Proxyman.io
100% 100%
Error Tracking
0% 0%
0% 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100%
100% 100%
Automated Testing
0% 0%
0% 0%
Proxy
100% 100%

Questions & Answers

As answered by people managing Testinel.dev and Proxyman.io.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Testinel.dev's answer

Choose Testinel if you want to understand and fix automated test failures—not replace your existing testing tools. Its lightweight pytest integration works locally and with virtually any CI system, without proprietary test runners, log scraping, or brittle CI workarounds. Teams get searchable test history, failure grouping, logs, artifacts, trends, and code-level context in one place, with a free plan available for individual users.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Testinel.dev's answer

Testinel is primarily built with Python and Django. Its official integration is a Python plugin for pytest, with first-class support for Selenium and Playwright test suites. Testinel works with local test runs and CI/CD platforms such as GitHub Actions, Bitbucket Pipelines, Azure Pipelines, Jenkins, and Woodpecker CI.

What makes your product unique?

Testinel.dev's answer

Testinel turns raw automated test results into actionable failure intelligence. Instead of making teams dig through CI logs and separate reports, it captures structured data directly from pytest, groups recurring failures, identifies likely root causes, highlights flaky tests, and provides clear context for fixing them. Testinel works with the test stack teams already use, including Python, pytest, Selenium, and Playwright.

How would you describe the primary audience of your product?

Testinel.dev's answer

Testinel is designed for QA automation engineers, SDETs, Python developers, engineering leads, and DevOps teams that run automated tests with pytest, Selenium, or Playwright. It is especially useful for teams that ship continuously and spend too much time investigating flaky tests, recurring failures, and noisy CI logs.

What's the story behind your product?

Testinel.dev's answer

Testinel grew out of more than two decades of hands-on experience in software testing, test automation, and reliable software engineering. Its founder, Volodymyr Obrizan, repeatedly saw teams invest heavily in automated tests only to lose hours investigating failures across CI logs, screenshots, and disconnected reports. Testinel was created in Ukraine to close that gap: turning test failures into understandable causes and practical next steps so engineering teams can fix problems faster and ship more reliable software.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

Testinel.dev's answer

  • 111Techs
  • Design and Test Lab

User comments

Share your experience with using Testinel.dev and Proxyman.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Log in or Post with

Reviews and articles

External articles and on-site reviews we used to compare the two products.

Testinel.dev no reviews yet
Proxyman.io no reviews yet

We have no reviews of Testinel.dev yet. Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Recommendations tracked on public social media and blogs since March 2021.

Testinel.dev 0 mentions
Proxyman.io 27 mentions

Tracking Testinel.dev since Jul 2026.

  • Charles Proxy
    I don't have elaborate needs and have used Charles for many years. A few years ago I switched to https://proxyman.com and found it easier to use. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Essential Mobile Testing Tools: A Developer's Complete Guide
    Network analysis tools like Charles Proxy and Proxyman provide essential debugging capabilities for mobile applications. These tools intercept and analyze all network traffic, enabling detailed inspection of API communications. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Catching useful errors when parsing JSON fails in Swift
    Armed with this you could now investigate the raw JSON using HTTP proxying (I like to use ProxyMan for this), and/or talk to the back-end team, see if they've made some changes and are aware of the breakage in the contract between client... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

View more

Alternatives to Testinel.dev and Proxyman.io

When comparing Testinel.dev and Proxyman.io, you can also consider the following products.

Loading...